It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Crakeur
let's assume he was talking about 9/11 and the wtc specifically.
why would they plant explosives high enough to trap people? they should be lower to the ground so that every floor between the plane crash and the explosion would be trapped.
even without planes, you would want to go with an explosion lower to the ground floor so as to trap eveyone above.
none of the comment makes sense. Bush has an articulation problem along with his speaking as if he took english as a second language.
perhaps this is akin to nucular in that he just speaks like a moron.
Originally posted by Valhall
LeftBehind,
I don't know what you think you're pointing out, but it's not sticking too well. Those paragraphs you just quoted, they have nothing to do with information he references from KSM - who was the planner of 9/11.
www.guardian.co.uk...
So we're working with Congress. The Supreme Court said, You must work with Congress. We are working with Congress to get a good piece of legislation out.
The bill I have proposed will ensure that suspected terrorists will receive full and fair trials without revealing to them our nation's sensitive intelligence secrets.
As soon as Congress acts on this bill, the men our intelligence believed helped orchestrate the 9/11 attacks can face justice.
The bill would also provide clear rules for our personnel involved in detaining and questioning captured terrorists.
The information that the Central Intelligence Agency has obtained by questioning men like Khalid Sheikh Mohammed has provided valuable information and has helped disrupt terrorist plots, including strikes within the United States.
For example, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed described the design of plane attacks on building inside the U.S. and how operatives were directed to carry them out. That is valuable information for those of us who have the responsibility to protect the American people.
He told us the operatives had been instructed to ensure that the explosives went off at a point that was high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping.
He gave us information that helped uncover al-Qaida cells' efforts to obtain biological weapons.
We've also learned information from the CIA program that has helped stop other plots, including attacks on the U.S. Marine base in East Africa, our American consulate in Pakistan, or Britain's Heathrow Airport.
This program has been one of the most vital tools in our efforts to protect this country. It's been invaluable to our country, and it's invaluable to our allies.
Were it not for this program, our intelligence community believes that al-Qaida and its allies would have succeeded in launching another attack against the American homeland.
By giving us information about terrorist plans we couldn't get anywhere else, this program has saved innocent lives. In other words, it's vital.
That's why I asked Congress to pass legislation so that our professionals can go forward doing the duty we expect them to do.
The information that the Central Intelligence Agency has obtained by questioning men like Khalid Sheikh Mohammed has provided valuable information and has helped disrupt terrorist plots, including strikes within the United States.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Considering that there were reports of explosions up and down the building, I'd say that the transformers were allowed in at least SOME of the areas that had them reported. And let's not forget the natural gas lines that ran up to the restaurant on the roof.
Natural gas is supplied to the complex but is in limited use, mainly
in the Vista Hotel’s kitchens but also in restaurants located on the
concourse of 5 WTC and the coffee tasting room at the New York
Commodities Exchange in 4 WTC. No natural gas is used in the two
towers.
Originally posted by Valhall
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Considering that there were reports of explosions up and down the building, I'd say that the transformers were allowed in at least SOME of the areas that had them reported. And let's not forget the natural gas lines that ran up to the restaurant on the roof.
Excuse me? There were no natural gas lines running to the restaurant on the roof. That would be in violation of building codes.
The limited natural gas usage was restricted WTC 5 and WTC 4. There was NO natural gas in WTC 1 or 2.
Natural gas is supplied to the complex but is in limited use, mainly
in the Vista Hotel’s kitchens but also in restaurants located on the
concourse of 5 WTC and the coffee tasting room at the New York
Commodities Exchange in 4 WTC. No natural gas is used in the two
towers.
Originally posted by DickBinBush
I'm assuming your side of this debate is that he didn't mean what he said? Basically, it's being taken out of context?
Originally posted by Dr Love
Because in reality the explosives weren't meant to trap people, they were demolitions meant to bring the buildings down.
Originally posted by twitchy
I thought perhaps some of you would benefit from this link...
Explosives
Originally posted by Fifth Horseman
It is freakin hilllllllarious watching Zaphod, Left Behind, and others like them continuously get pummelled on a daily basis. The pathetic and flimsy arguements, the willingness to ignore all the evidence, the constant backing of each others weak points, taking things out of context.... Please, Valhall, twitchy, take it easy on them, its not a fair fight.
Originally posted by DickBinBush
Originally posted by twitchy
I thought perhaps some of you would benefit from this link...
Explosives
ok..? we know what explosion means. provide some evidence to back up your boys that "transformers" or other objects exploded and violently enough to bring down both towers. Oh and, you're saying that this gas and jet fuel went down the elevator shaft to exactly find some transformers and be a big enough bang to bring down the tower? And if that wasn't good enough..it then proceeded to do it in BOTH towers? That's all forgetting Building 7 of course. Give me a break..
Originally posted by Valhall
KSM planned the 9/11 attacks. That plan included flying planes into buildings. Bush says KSM stated during interrogations that the operatives were instructed to ensure the explosives went off at a sufficient height to block exit by the occupants of the building.
www.guardian.co.uk...
The information that the Central Intelligence Agency has obtained by questioning men like Khalid Sheikh Mohammed has provided valuable information and has helped disrupt terrorist plots, including strikes within the United States.
For example, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed described the design of plane attacks on building inside the U.S. and how operatives were directed to carry them out. That is valuable information for those of us who have the responsibility to protect the American people.
Emphasis and comma added by me.
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed has provided valuable information and has helped disrupt terrorist plots, including strikes within the United States, for example, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed described the design of plane attacks on building inside the U.S. and how operatives were directed to carry them out.
Originally posted by Crakeur
Originally posted by DickBinBush
I'm assuming your side of this debate is that he didn't mean what he said? Basically, it's being taken out of context?
No, I'm merely pointing out the lunacy in placing explosions higher up in the building to trap the floors when there is a plane crashed and burning on the higher floors.
He might have read the words right off the teleprompter and said explosives instead of explosions, referring to flying the plane high up in the building. (just thinking here, not saying this is the case) It is commonplace for someone to subconsiously swap out one word for another. Maybe that is all this is. Remember, he reads nuclear and says nucular.
Originally posted by Dr Love
Because in reality the explosives weren't meant to trap people, they were demolitions meant to bring the buildings down.
than what the hell is he saying when he says that the explosions were meant to trap the floors? did he want to ensure that the furniture didn't go anywhere?
if he was referencing a demolition, he'd have said something about the bombs/explosions being placed throughout the building, not just high up.
As I said to dick, it just makes no sense in the context of the WTC. It's a strange comment for sure but he's been known to say them. In an interview with Katie Couric he recently said something akin to "the purpose of my presidency has been to tie Iraq to the events of 9/11." The man shouldn't be allowed to use too many words in a day. He just doesn't display the ability to do this with any great skill.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Originally posted by DickBinBush
Originally posted by twitchy
I thought perhaps some of you would benefit from this link...
Explosives
ok..? we know what explosion means. provide some evidence to back up your boys that "transformers" or other objects exploded and violently enough to bring down both towers. Oh and, you're saying that this gas and jet fuel went down the elevator shaft to exactly find some transformers and be a big enough bang to bring down the tower? And if that wasn't good enough..it then proceeded to do it in BOTH towers? That's all forgetting Building 7 of course. Give me a break..
Where have I or anyone else said that the transformers or other exploding things brought the towers down? All I am saying is that they can be responsible for the REPORTS of explosions in the towers.
He told us the operatives had been instructed to ensure that the explosives went off at a point that was high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping.
He gave us information that helped uncover al-Qaida cells' efforts to obtain biological weapons.
We've also learned information from the CIA program that has helped stop other plots, including attacks on the U.S. Marine base in East Africa, our American consulate in Pakistan, or Britain's Heathrow Airport.