It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AhabstarThis is why I doubt CD on WTC7.
Originally posted by ANOK
You don't need physics 101 to understand this. For a building to fall this way ALL the supports would have to fail at the same time, how does that happen from localised damage? It doesn't and never has.
Preparation operations for the implosion were more sophisticated than those required for a "normal implosion operation." When a structure is imploded, the contractor relies on the structural integrity of the building being demolished to assist in the control of the fall of the structure. In the case of the Murrah Building, the structural integrity of the building had been compromised by the terrorist blast, therefore, reconstructive operations had to be conducted to augment the structural integrity of the building in order to control its fall away from the adjacent parking garage.
NOVA: Why do the explosive charges go off at intervals rather than all at once?
SL: Well, if I kick both your legs out from under you, you're going to fall right on your butt. If I kick one leg out from under you, you'll fall left or right. So the way we control the failure of the building is by using the delays. And, again, that varies structure to structure and depending on where we want the building to go. A lot of people, when they see a building implosion, expect it to go into its own basement, which is not always what the contractor wants. Sometimes the contractor wants to lay the building out like a tree. And, sometime, we need to bring down buildings that are actually touching other buildings.
NOVA: I understand that Controlled Demolition was hired to bring down the remains of the Oklahoma City Federal Building. Were you out there for that?
SL: That was a little too much for me, emotionally. I asked not to go on that job. My father and my uncle went out.
NOVA: How did they describe it?
SL: Well, any time you have a damaged structure it's a totally different animal. I mean it is much harder for us to bring down a structure that's already damaged, because you no longer know how the forces are working. In that building, there was literally one column left in that whole building.
Originally posted by Smack
So, now we are supposed to ignore the Video evidence.
Originally posted by Smack
Who ya gonna believe, me or your lyin eyes?
Originally posted by ANOK
Find me a building that has done this, I guarantee you you can't.
Originally posted by LeftBehind
Just because something has never happened before does not mean it is impossible.
You have voted wecomeinpeace for the Way Above Top Secret award. You have two more votes this month.
Originally posted by LeftBehind
I wasn't aware that you had proved the collapses impossible.
Please share this truth with us. I'm sure you have some sort of equation and calculations to show us right?
Some things are impossible because we have certain physical laws that prevent it. The laws of physics don't change.
Originally posted by LeftBehind
I never claimed that the laws of physics prove my case.
Originally posted by Griff
That says it all right there. So, you and the government don't need to take the laws of physics into account?