John Lear's Moon Pictures on ATS

As I was pointing out earlier these features are huge, what are the scales on some of these "human" operations?

This one is also from C#4.

At first, I thought there was a squiggle on the scanner, but upon a closer look, I'm not so sure.

I guess even peekaboos need to recharge/refuel at some point.



Found here...


Fill-er up!!!

EDIT: added location pic

[edit on 21-1-2007 by Zarniwoop]

Again what are the scales on these?

Originally posted by FreiMaurer
Again what are the scales on these?

Scales for these photos are discussed in the early portions of this thread. Read through the first 10 pages or so and you should find them, I "think"

Originally posted by FreiMaurer
Again what are the scales on these?

All the info on scale and other image data is on the menu page on my website

landoflegends.us...

Skeptic Overlord posted this image in the other thread that was there on this topic... can't seem to find it now though...

Here is a quote that is relevant to the question of scale...

Posted by SkepticOverlord, on September 18, 2006 at 22:00 GMT

Granted, the violence and kinetic energy of a massive meteor impact can certainly melt rock and cause all manner of formations.

On the other hand, there are some compelling features that have unique parallels.


image on left en.wikipedia.org...

If this is a surface mining site, I think it's ancient.

Posted by SkepticOverlord, on September 19, 2006 at 14:28 GMT

To illustrate the point, I've added what should be a reasonable representation of a yellow steam shovel (they're not so little) to the photo at what should be scale.

Here: www.waid-observatory.com... The copernicus walls are 11,400 feet at their tallest point... if we assume worst case, I cropped the image to cover the cliff only, and scaled it to 456 pixels, or one pixel for every 25 feet. (The scale is likely off due to the perspective of the photo, but it's close enough for what we're doing here.)

Now if we assign a very generous height of 75 feet to our shovel, it will look something like this:

Originally posted by Zarniwoop
At first, I thought there was a squiggle on the scanner, but upon a closer look, I'm not so sure.

Nice squiggle to be sure....

Originally posted by Lexion
Are there any better images out there, that show detail ?

Oh yes for sure!!! NASA has them

Smoke from a cluster of buildings....

I call this one Smoke and UFOs

Here's the original piece


Here it is with colored highlighting to point out some of the anomalies


And here's the Source photo from Apollo 12 archives i do believe:
thestargates.com...

Oops i missed one of the contestants in the Space Colony contest NASA has going on. This was the Grand Winners of the first contest (apparently they have a new contest going on, presumably to help design the south pole base. Entertaining the native population, i guess):

LEDA
www.belmont.k12.ca.us...

Anomalies are often oddly contradictory. You might see a perfectly square or rectangular building with windows/doors and other artificial constructs, and still not be able to pin it down to detail worthy of the level of proof necessary for the chronically skeptical. Part of this enigma is hidden in lunar regolith.

Lunar regolith is the native soil/rocks of the moon, which are used to create a barrier between the people inside the installation and the bombardment of
radiation particles. It also acts as an insulator, to regulate and moderate the extreme heat and cold of the lunar day and night.

So if you were wondering why some of the anomalies look like the landscape has eaten them - it really isn't a case of eaten, it's a case of protection from the elements using lunar regolith.

Here's an article from NASA on the subject:
Digging in and taking cover
Lunar and Martian dirt could provide radiation shielding for crews on future mission
science.nasa.gov...

[edit on 22-1-2007 by undo]

Mr. Lear, thank you for the photos.
I also want to say that I do believe the situation is very interesting and plausible.
That being said, I hope you appreciate what I have found in the
upper-right of the Copernicus 1 image:



This is the magnified version. Magnify as needed.


i138.photobucket.com...



[edit on 22-1-2007 by IeatALIENS]

[edit on 22-1-2007 by IeatALIENS]

I hope I didn't offend anybody. I was just trying to lighten the mood.
Thanks.

Originally posted by IeatALIENS
Mr. Lear, thank you for the photos.
I also want to say that I do believe the situation is very interesting and plausible.
That being said, I hope you appreciate what I have found in the
upper-right of the Copernicus 1 image:
This is the magnified version. Magnify as needed.
i138.photobucket.com...

Thanks for the post IeatALIENS. We enjoy input from anyone who may wish to contribute. Some contributions are better than others but all are appreciated. We hope that in the future you have a post thats even more valuable than the last. If that were possible. Thanks again.

Mr Lear,

Listened to you on the C2C show the other day and it was riveting stuff!! FANTASTIC!! I am most interested in your assertion that the moon is being mined in Copernicus crater. A few weeks back I was studying the Hubble telescope photo of Earths moon. There you can clearly see a 4/5 sided pyramid at the 2 o'clock position inside the rim of Copernicus. The rim appears to have been mined as theres a great chunk missing ! Just north of the pyramid appears to me tiny rectangular shapes which could be machinery.

Also at the 10/11 o'clock position inside the rim there can clearly be seen a SMOKING stack which casts a shadow against the wall of the crater.

I have also seen you mention Aristarchus crater and inside there appears to be something resembling a spaceship.

The photos can be found at hubblesite.org

ARISTARCHUS PLATEAU THE MOON (jpeg 500.3kB)

CLOSE-UP OF CRATER COPERNICUS ON EARTHS MOON doc 16 photo ST Scl-PRC1999-14b (jpeg 565kB).

Hope you see it and hope to see you at the International UFO congress at Laughlin if you are going??

Regards and keep up the great work John.

John, you may have already covered this toppic, but are bad souls weeded out from the good when arriving at the soul catcher on our Moon. Or is it the biological DNA of an individual that plays into a person being good or bad? I do relize all humans can be bad or good at times but I am talking overall. Rik Riley

Here is the ORIGINAL size of the photos taken by Lunar Orbiter....

This is the NASA photo crew working on Lunar Orbiter IV images...


Soooo WHERE ARE THESE BIG PICTURES NOW????




This one is interesting... the impact site of Ranger III taken by Lunar Orbiter II, a lesson in photo object identification...




LOL that's right boys and girls... this one is done by NASA Scientists...

[edit on 22-1-2007 by zorgon]

Originally posted by zorgon
Soooo WHERE ARE THESE BIG PICTURES NOW????

buried in the basement of a backroom of an unknown location

This one is interesting... the impact site of Ranger III taken by Lunar Orbiter II, a lesson in photo object identification...

Maybe they're watching our object identification exercise as well

Here's another "peekaboo" (we need a new name for these) station in C#3



Looks like the attendant hasn't hooked up the tether on this one yet. Copernicus has cheap fuel, but the service is lacking

Location map...



[edit on 23-1-2007 by Zarniwoop]

So who exactly is involved with the moon bases? I'm having trouble figuring this out. I can see by the photos that there are unexplained anomolies, that is obvious.

I'm trying to get my mind around the big picture. Some say that at some point in Earth's history we were visited by Alliens, they either built the pyramids or taught us how. Obviously their technology was far superior than ours even to this day. So wouldn't their technology be even more advanced today? Would they have need for the "Earth-human" looking structures on the moon if their technology advanced like ours has? Though at their rate it may be unimaginable to us.

I wonder how Ed Leedskalnin figured out how to build his coral castle, www.coralcastle.com...

He claims to have figured out how the pyramids were built, alas, his secret seems to have died with him. Apparently he did not receive any alien help or information at least none that he cared to mention.

I'm not trying to yank anyone's chain, just trying to apply some critical thinking to this overall topic.

I recently watched a show on the Science channel called "If We Had No Moon" and they just said something that made me remember a discussion on this thread about the bright reflections on the moon's surface.
They said that one of the Apollo missions (Apollo 12 I think) placed big reflector panels on the moon for measuring the distance of the moon from the Earth for one of the Universities. Supposedly a laser is bounced off of these panels and the researchers take measurements that allows them to tell things such as if the moon is moving further and further away from us.
One could question how they managed to get such large panels to the surface if they only had the crude technology they told us we had at that time.
I recall though, astronaut's conversations about there being a sort of fluorescence on the surface of the moon.
Even if they did place some panels they couldn't explain everything. It just seemed like a plausible cause for some of the reflections.
Finally, has anyone found any of these same anomalies on here moon.google.com or have these photos been doctored also?

Scratch that, the Google turns out to be someone's idea of a joke, after you zoom in so far it becomes a picture of cheese...sheesh...


Thanks for reading,
Namaste


[edit on 23-1-2007 by Xtr3m3]