John Lear's Moon Pictures on ATS

Originally posted by undo
Now be a good dragon and go lay down over yonder where I slew ya.

\ You win!


admin edit: Removed vulgur, immature and NOT "ATS QUALITY" remark from post. FIRST & LAST "freebie" AD the next one will have you banned (again).



[edit on 6-15-2007 by Springer]

Originally posted by Access Denied

Must be that time of the month again... in which case I know better... so guess what? You win!

Hrm, insulting my gender eh? I'm well past that time of life (too old, sorry charlie). And yes, I did win. Cause it's the truth and the truth'll set ya free. So go now, be free little dragon!

Originally posted by undo
Can't have the hamburgers going out to the public

If this is a reference to Tomi De Paola my hat's off to you

The rest of us are not so simplistic to accept short order cooked answers either.

Originally posted by Matyas

Originally posted by undo
Can't have the hamburgers going out to the public

If this is a reference to Tomi De Paola my hat's off to you

The rest of us are not so simplistic to accept short order cooked answers either.

Aww but that Tomi is cute.

He looks very happy.

Originally posted by undo
Hrm, insulting my gender eh? I'm well past that time of life (too old, sorry charlie).

[shudder]

Originally posted by undo
And yes, I did win. Cause it's the truth and the truth'll set ya free. So go now, be free little dragon!

I could explain why that picture looks the way it does if I thought you really wanted to know the answer but I see your mind has already been closed so thank you and good night...

Originally posted by Access Denied

I could explain why that picture looks the way it does if I thought you really wanted to know the answer but I see your mind has already been closed so thank you and good night...

Just like you can explain how when it gets texturized, there's actually less detail.

posting it again, just in case you missed it before


Hrm, lookie there, it's less defined when the texture is applied, yet, if you look on the bigger picture of it, the rest of the area is all in this pretense of texturization. What's all that clear , crisp hairy stuff if the texturization is the real image? Do you mean to say that the clear junk is data loss? Oh please, say that you do so I can laugh for the rest of the afternoon!

[edit on 15-6-2007 by undo]

Did you ask Nasa about that 'hair' texture and why the other half is blurry Undo? I doubt they will use hair and when other pictures are to be made they allways have to use hair Why would they do it anyway, it sounds like a awfull job to do just for every picture of Europa.

Originally posted by Cygnific
Why would they do it anyway, it sounds like a awfull job to do just for every picture of Europa.

Ooo, do we have other pictures this close of Europa besides this particular mission? Comparative analysis would be great!

Originally posted by undo
Hrm, lookie there, it's less defined when the texture is applied, yet, if you look on the bigger picture of it, the rest of the area is all in this pretense of texturization. What's all that clear , crisp hairy stuff if the texturization is the real image? Do you mean to say that the clear junk is data loss?

If you’re serious about this, provide me with a source for this image and I'll see what I can find out and get back to you OK?

In the meantime, please explain to me what you think "they" are trying to hide from you in this particular image and why.

Originally posted by Access Denied

If you’re serious about this, provide me with a source for this image and I'll see what I can find out and get back to you OK?

In the meantime, please explain to me what you think "they" are trying to hide from you in this particular image and why.

It's on PDS Map A Planet by the USGS.
pdsmaps.wr.usgs.gov...

I have to go now. I'm old and tired and kicked your dragon butt about 2 hours ago, anyway. I need rest

Hey Access Denied,

Just curious do you work for NASA or the government?

If not why are you here on these forums if you think that NASA is not hiding anything and everything is hunky dory and that we should just go back to believing every single word that they say. Im sorry but some of your recent posts are just starting to sound like a corrupt politician.

On the other hand I would like to throw out this thought. Would it be possible for activity to be happening on the moon weather it is Black Ops or Alien and NASA not know about it?

Originally posted by undo

Originally posted by Cygnific
Why would they do it anyway, it sounds like a awfull job to do just for every picture of Europa.

Ooo, do we have other pictures this close of Europa besides this particular mission? Comparative analysis would be great!

I dont have closeups other then whats shown on the web. But why would NASA say it has a thick frozen layer and 'maybe' even life but make up a weird texture with hair. It just doesn't make sense. I'm just curious to why you think it is hair and not cracks in the ice or another explanation.

Originally posted by Cygnific


I dont have closeups other then whats shown on the web. But why would NASA say it has a thick frozen layer and 'maybe' even life but make up a weird texture with hair. It just doesn't make sense. I'm just curious to why you think it is hair and not cracks in the ice or another explanation.

Have you looked at it closely?
That might be strands of ice of differing colors and sizes, but the crazy thing is what happens where the texturization isn't applied.

Originally posted by housegroove23
Just curious do you work for NASA or the government?

Yes but not today. I took the day off to finish doing this stupid online traffic school thing that’s due today and is taking me a lot longer than I expected.

Originally posted by housegroove23
Im sorry but some of your recent posts are just starting to sound like a corrupt politician.

Duly noted. Fortunately I’m not.

Originally posted by housegroove23
Would it be possible for activity to be happening on the moon weather it is Black Ops or Alien and NASA not know about it?

Black Ops no, Alien yes, although I find that extremely unlikely and I’ve yet to see any credible evidence to the contrary that would lead me to believe otherwise.

Originally posted by Cygnific
I dont have closeups other then whats shown on the web.

You've probably seen this already but this one by Voyager just blows me away...

solarsystem.jpl.nasa.gov...



Here's the highest res photo taken by Galileo...



photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov...

Looks a lot different up close.

Originally posted by Access Denied...My email address [email protected] or my MIB joke (“How do you know I’m not?”) you didn’t get?

I would have liked to work at USASMDC, but I did USAADASCH. So does that make me a "rocket scientist" too?

And if you have a TS clearance I feel for ya, because you will never be able to talk, no matter how much you want to. I find the ones who have one rarely if ever advertise.

People say I've "worked for" the gov., but I do that every day paying taxes. And I don't go around saying I've "worked for" them, even if it could be proven its not the way to win friends and influence people. Compartmentalization works against the "insider" too.

maybe the aliens are modifying the images. maybe the government has no choice. maybe its changed electromagnetically before it ever reaches the planet. i dunno. all i know is what i see.

i gotta bow out of this horse and pony show. i'm in severe pain already from being confrontational and stressed out. so do me a favor, AD and just try to be a bit more gracious. otherwise, i won't be able to read the thread. i'll be too tempted to slay another dragon. i don't like pain.

Matyas, would you please quit obsessing over me and digging for information that’s none of your business with your cryptic BS posts and poorly conceived stinky bait? Otherwise I'm afraid I’m going to have file an unsolicited contact report and I *hate* doing paperwork.

Thank you.

AD

P.S. When was the last time you contributed anything of substance to this thread?

AD, I appreciate Matyas posts. He is a catalyst for thought. Maybe he knows something, maybe he doesn't. But the rhetorical questions posed by him make me think in different contexts.

That is pretty substantial. I have no problem with a catalyst.

Originally posted by Access Denied

Originally posted by housegroove23
Just curious do you work for NASA or the government?

Yes but not today. I took the day off to finish doing this stupid online traffic school thing that’s due today and is taking me a lot longer than I expected.

Well if you really do, even though I don't agree or trust everything that you say.......you have my respect.

[edit on 6/15/07 by housegroove23]