It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by rougevif
As i said previously in the post, i am living on the other side of the planet so i cannot post 24/7 and i also work...i am glad you are systematically posting after me which means you are closely following what i am saying and you thoroughly make sure i can t post the last one.
I am not insulting the masons, i am severely criticising their objectives.
i think it is funny you would defend the masons systematically...but this is your right. I live in a country where this is forbidden to be a mason so i let you figure out which one...hehehe.
you can also condition yourself on this site www.disney.com
see you next post i suppose...
Originally posted by rougevif
as this author says and i fully agree 90 percent of the masons are not aware of the goals of their leaders.
Originally posted by rougevif
i think you are just great.
no leaders...no roots...then what do you believe in...or what idea are you giving to others about free masonry...
anyway...i think everybody will have notice anytime i post something you are systematically after me.
what is your opnion on the MK ultra? paperclip? projects...
do you thik henry kissinger was a good man?
have you ever heard about pike? crowley? russel? hubbard? just to name these.
Originally posted by Masonic Light
Why won't you just answer the question? Why do you change the subject by talking about MK Ultra? Why do you bring up Crowley, Russell, Kissinger, and Hubbard? None of them were even Masons, much less Masonic leaders.
Originally posted by zman
Hi , is it me or am I going nuts. Its seems to me that if one posts anything about masons then they get slammed by fellow followers. If indeed the information is faulty should not the Moderators take actions to either remove the post for false information or U2 the person posting telling them that there information lacks credibility. Do the moderators believe one side or the other, hence I can not say, but to let them, meaning fellows of the craft jump all over the poster is wrong and I think someone should step in and do something. Maybe both are right. Maybe, as I say we need to cool with the blasting and make sure our comments are wise and valid. Its up to the reader to beware I guess and do there own homework. But, like I said to constantly blast posters gives them more credibility don’t you think. Many Blessings.
Originally posted by rougevif
i think you are just great.
no leaders...no roots...then what do you believe in...or what idea are you giving to others about free masonry...
anyway...i think everybody will have notice anytime i post something you are systematically after me.
what is your opnion on the MK ultra? paperclip? projects...
Headed by Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, MKULTRA was started on the order of CIA director Allen Dulles on April 13, 1953[5], largely in response to alleged Soviet, Chinese, and North Korean use of mind-control techniques on U.S. prisoners of war in Korea.[6] The CIA wanted to use similar methods on their own captives. The CIA was also interested in being able to manipulate foreign leaders with such techniques[7], and would later invent several schemes to drug Fidel Castro.
In 1964, the project was renamed MKSEARCH. The project attempted to produce a perfect truth drug for use in interrogating suspected Soviet spies during the Cold War, and generally to explore any other possibilities of mind control.
Because most of the MKULTRA records were deliberately destroyed in 1972 by order of the Director at that time, Richard Helms, it is impossible to have a complete understanding of the more than 150 individually funded research projects sponsored by MKULTRA and related CIA programs.
Dr. Sidney Gottlieb approved of an MKULTRA subproject on '___' in this June 9, 1953 letter.Experiments were often conducted without the subjects' knowledge or consent
do you thik henry kissinger was a good man?
have you ever heard about pike? crowley? russel? hubbard? just to name these.
Originally posted by rougevif
You fall alot
i have no interest in discussing in particular except in U2U
kissinger was the most devasting man of the US government...apart from another one anyone can easily refer to by themselves.
you apparently are not a mason or not informed about them.
kissinger was one such as the above mentionned. but as you are not one, there is not way you are going to defend them ever and ever right.
you deny ignorance...then explain what they are doing in the montauk park or below it at the moment...
have you read about o'brien, al bielek? you should this is higly instructive
Originally posted by zman
Hi , is it me or am I going nuts. Its seems to me that if one posts anything about masons then they get slammed by fellow followers.
If indeed the information is faulty should not the Moderators take actions to either remove the post for false information
or U2 the person posting telling them that there information lacks credibility.
Do the moderators believe one side or the other,
but to let them, meaning fellows of the craft jump all over the poster is wrong
Originally posted by rougevif
this is wh ywe need moderator...to put order.
legitimatelly the masons can contest me or what i am saying neverthelesss the fact remains.
should i gave a bibliography again?
still wondering why there is a 555 feet obelisk in the center of DC. this is not exactlely Assouan right? neither patis london or Hong kong.