It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Seekerof
Well Colonel, I'll give you that, you are calling things AS YOU SEE them.....
Correction though........politicians, regardless of party affiliation 'care' about the poor.
'Poor' is not regulated to this current administration......duh!?
Middle class is dwindling....this is also not regulated to this administration.......
Anything else?
You deny looking a reality when all that matters to your own relaity is BUSH......
BTW.....Budweiser still producing BUSH beer? If so, have one.
regards
seekerof
[Edited on 3-11-2003 by Seekerof]
Originally posted by Colonel
Repugnatsn would never vote for her. A black Democrat female? Yeah right!
Originally posted by Kai-Raega
Originally posted by Colonel
Repugnatsn would never vote for her. A black Democrat female? Yeah right!
Thats a huge problem in this country right now. Don't you find it funny that there was such a BIG DEAL made about JFK when he won? They thought it was revolutionary to have a CATHOLIC president!! My gosh! He might push the pope's rules on us!
I always thought that was funny. A Catholic president was seen as "Revolutionary". Imagine what a woman president would do. Or, maybe (Gasp) an African American one!
Sooner or later, it will change. The Latino and African American populations are soon going to outnumber the White/Anglo saxon males and then what? You'll still have a country run by the "white" minority? Don't bet on it.
Maybe we can convince Chuck D to enter politics.
Originally posted by Kai-Raega
Sooner or later, it will change. The Latino and African American populations are soon going to outnumber the White/Anglo saxon males and then what? You'll still have a country run by the "white" minority? Don't bet on it.
Originally posted by SeekerofCorrection though........politicians, regardless of party affiliation, 'care' about the poor.
'Poor' is not regulated to this current administration.[Edited on 3-11-2003 by Seekerof]
Originally posted by nyeff
You won't vote vote for Bush because 240 soldiers have been killed??? Kennendy and LBJ killed 58,000 in Vietnam. It was Nixon that pulled em out.
Originally posted by Colonel
Originally posted by nyeff
You won't vote vote for Bush because 240 soldiers have been killed??? Kennendy and LBJ killed 58,000 in Vietnam. It was Nixon that pulled em out.
And you conveniently forget John McNamara. It was his WAR and you also forget Kissinger and the Killing Fields. That was HIS doing.
Anyway, none of that matters b/c I wasn't even old enough to vote then.
(Always pointing fingers to something that happened 2-3 decades ago) WHAT ABOUT NOW??????
Originally posted by nyeff
I am not making light of soldiers that have been killed. But to put a little perspective on it. More people are killed in car wrecks in the US everyday. Than have been killed in Iraq on a daily basis.
If you want to lose a war...put a democrat in office.
Originally posted by Fury
I think, if you look at bush as a man, and not the anti christ, or the republican evil doer, he seems to be trying to get the most done in the least amount of time. his forcefullness in office is what i appreciate.
now i don't agree with everything he has put forward.
like the patriot act, and then no war reperations for the money we gave Iraq,
but all in all, i have respect for the man. not the image.