It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
How do they know that?
Originaly posted by Regenmacher
40 years lifespan for the average DVD and for phthalocyanine and azo DVD's your looking at 100+ years, so burn it.
Magnetic or electron based storage can and will fail before a DVD's light-sensitive dyes will.
Originally posted by ArMaP
How do they know that?
But the most used backup media is the magnetic tape...
Originally posted by Regenmacher
Magnetic data is a crappy long term storage medium and then to suggest that a person also become dependent on a specific hardware device is nuts.
If you are lucky, if you are unlucky the scratch makes the disk unusable.
Scratches can be polished and data transfered to a new disk cost pennies.
I had more CD failures than hard disk failures, that is one of the reasons why I prefer hard disks.
I have 100's of CD's from the 80's and I lost maybe 2 due to misuse and bad handling. Nowadays, I just use them as masters and burn compilations to new CD's. On the other hand, I have seen numerous hard drives fail or their data become corrupted.
The price difference is not that big, and if you really need the data than price should not be the stronger argument.
A dollar DVD versus a new hard drive...do the math.
Originally posted by ArMaP
One thing that should be clear is that if the data is really important than we should make more than one backup, preferably in different formats, redundancy is the best way of being safe.