It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Analysis of WTC Demo theorys by demolition experts

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 28 2006 @ 07:04 PM
link   
implosionworld.com...

Mod Note (This Appears On Every New Thread/Post Reply Page): MEMBERS: Do not simply post news articles in the forums without comment. If you feel inclined to make the board aware of current events, please post the first paragraph, a link to the entire story, AND your opinion, twist or take on the news item.

[edit on 28/8/2006 by Umbrax]



posted on Aug, 28 2006 @ 07:14 PM
link   
Hmmm...

Who wote this?



posted on Aug, 28 2006 @ 07:24 PM
link   
All the info and creds are in the report. You can also goto implosionworld.com and check out the site.



posted on Aug, 28 2006 @ 07:35 PM
link   
This was posted before, lol.

I created a thread in response to it here:

www.abovetopsecret.com...


Too bad HowardRoark tried to completely derail the topic, as it usually goes. But Blanchard's argument basically boils down to "it didn't look like a conventional demo so therefore it must not have been a demo, and I believe the NIST Report."



posted on Aug, 28 2006 @ 07:38 PM
link   
Please use the thread linked to above by bsbray11 for comments on this subject.

This thread is now closed. Thank you.




 
0

log in

join