posted on Nov, 2 2003 @ 02:03 AM
Hello,
I'll cut to the chase: When I got out of college I worked as a substitute teacher for a few months... This was before I started working in the
library system. While working as a sub I met another teacher who was accused, by a student, of being a pedophile... This student made thier
accusation on a post they sent to a small website owned by another student. In it, they never mentioned this guy by his name... only by his nickname.
Well, within about two days of this posting, parents were calling the school board and demanding his resignation.
My point is this: It's not cool or 'ok' if someone makes an accusation about someone else -- an accusation that can harm their employment -- if it
is on a website and involves nicknames. It is simply NOT OK. This is especially so if those nicknames can be tracked back to a specific person. So,
when I see a website claiming that they have no control over whether or not members decide to use its domain as a venue to kill someone else's
career... I start to worry.
Recently a former member who is employed in an academic field was accused of plagiarism by a current member. A plagiarism accusation, in the academic
world, often equals the end of a career. The current member, in this case, was 'warned' (did he lose u2u access for a day or two?) because of his
actions. Now, I want all of you to think about your job and the people who rely on you... and ask yourself if your job is being protected by the
current policies of ATS.