It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by timeless test
...the two containers involved carried water and some form of cosmetic - no comment, however, on why the swab test suggested explosives...
Originally posted by R3KR
Why do they care what people carry on ? dosnt make any sense when any moron can put a huge ass bomb in the cargo area of a plane just by sending some luggage and never getting on the plane.
Originally posted by timeless test
... and whilst I'm not saying it can't be done it is quite tricky to get your luggage into the hold of a plane without you being sat above it as there are extensive procedures to match people with bags.
Originally posted by darkelf
Originally posted by timeless test
... and whilst I'm not saying it can't be done it is quite tricky to get your luggage into the hold of a plane without you being sat above it as there are extensive procedures to match people with bags.
If that is true, how come my baggage ends up someplace that I don't?
Hold luggage is scanned by much more sophisticated kit that hand luggage
Originally posted by Strangerous
Pre 9/11 I was twice waived around the body scanner at LAX as there was a queue
Why go to all the trouble and risk of trying to build and smuggle a bomb on board a flight, when you can just put a Dell laptop in with your hold-luggage
Originally posted by niklaus
the next logical step would be to fashion clothing
Originally posted by niklaus
My concern is that if liquids are banned, the next logical step would be to fashion clothing from woven Nitrocellulose fibers, and detonators that could be assembled from harmless-looking jewelry.
Of course if that happens, then everyone will be required to board the plane in the nude. The I would get stuck on the filght with all the really ugly people.