It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by btho5888
Wow Argos....an anti George Bush film. That happens to only show one side of the story. Now that is something to make one think.
Originally posted by DigitalGrl
Argos- you make a good counter assessment. i see what you are saying. i personally am not sure what is going on. im more likely leaning on the fact that our government may simply not be keeping up with security as well as they claimed to be. but a conspiracy is always possible.
but if you dont mind, id like to pose another question
lets say what you are suggesting is dead on, is there anything that we could really do as citizens? a persons eyes might be opened, but that doesn't necessarily keep them safe, or change the course of action of those in power.
Digitalgrl
Originally posted by DigitalGrl
i definatly agree and have thought that those are courses of action that we can take. but they dont cause immediate action all the time. it usually takes time for things to change...which in the mean time, lets those in power possibly round up those in protest and paint them as lunatics, to at least get one more if not two more events that they had planned to take place. all im saying is that whatever is ABOUT to happen in the short term, probably cant be stopped by us. so we need to stay vigilant and uncover as much as we can, if something IS a conspiracy in order to at least cause change so that what is planned down the line, gets thrown off a bit.
Cherrio!
digitalgrl
[edit on 10/01/2004 by DigitalGrl]
Originally posted by DigitalGrl
if the government really wanted to stage attacks so they could say "hey look how many we stopped you cant stop them all" Digitalgrl
Originally posted by Katolu
I'm torn on this. It's very easy and convenient to state that the U.S. government would stage an attack against itself and use that as an excuse to attack Iran. I've read the links and the supporting information, but to me it comes across as a red herring meant to occupy our time and energy.
What at first seems more simplistic, there are groups that want to do the U.S. great harm, to me actually is a much more involved then it appears.
Are we given just enough "information" to speculate that the U.S. will attack itself so that it can wage war? Or are we given the "information" to draw us away from seeing that the U.S. government is simply unable to fully protect its citizens and boarders from attack?
Wouldn't it be better (in the mind of the administration) to have the population wrangling over plots and schemes than to let them see that they aren't really safe?
I won't draw a conclusion just yet; the players are still taking the stage.