It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by svenglezz
First I personaly feel we should talk about WTC 1 and 2 NOT No. 7......
Originally posted by svenglezz
First I personaly feel we should talk about WTC 1 and 2 NOT No. 7......
Originally posted by svenglezz
....but if we don't discuss we never find the truth....
Originally posted by Vushta
You're appearently incorrect.
www.nae.edu...
Originally posted by esdad71
This is why I never mentioned the courses I studied in school.
Originally posted by esdad71
How do you friends in the service feel about you serving a country you do not trust or beleive in?
Originally posted by esdad71
Can you tell us what unit you are/were in or is it top secret?
Originally posted by esdad71
Tell me, what can you derive from that?
Originally posted by esdad71
I graduated from college in Florida, and did graduate studies there and in NY. That is all you need to know. I mean, have you never met someone who changed a major, or had dual majors? This happens, and it happens quite often.
Originally posted by esdad71
You didn't say weeks, the official story did. The fires burned for months. Of course it was smoldering and it was hot. It was like a metal compost pile if you think about it. It is rare for a natural thermite reaction, but it could have occured. This however does not prove use of thermite to bring the towers down.
Originally posted by esdad71
When the WTC was built, it did not need to adhere to code in this day and age would have never been approved to be built.
Originally posted by esdad71
ALso, The designer never made that statement.
Leslie E. Robertson, the engineer of the Word Trade Center complex and the director of design for Leslie E. Robertson Associates in New York City, says that the wind loads on the buildings dictated their structural design, and that fact worked in the buildings’ favor on September 11. “The towers were designed to withstand a 707—a low-flying and slow-flying jet airliner,” Robertson says. “So now people ask, ‘Well, if they were designed for a 707, why did they stand up under the impact of a 767, which was traveling much faster and carrying far more fuel?’ The reason is that the towers were built using one basic overriding criterion: the wind.” Robertson’s design was the first for a high-rise structure ever to undergo wind tunnel tests, and the results produced a stiff, redundant structural design.
Originally posted by esdad71
Let me ask you a question LAES YVAN, where do you get the background to assert the claims that you do
Originally posted by esdad71
and to tell me that i am not correct in my beliefs?
Originally posted by esdad71
Did you read the report? Stop looking at pictures and read something for a change.
Building Conditions
Data for building conditions has been expanded and enhanced
through photographs, video, and interview records:
- Debris Impact from WTC 1 and WTC 2
- Observed and Reported Fire Locations and Times
- External Signs of Collapse
Originally posted by esdad71
congratulations, you did a little research. He is quoting someone else. Besides, I thought you were talking about the person who designed the building, Minoru Yamasaki.
Originally posted by esdad71
Also, the only evidence you offer is that everyone who knows thte real story is dead. How convienant for you. If you feel that you do not want to believe any part of the official and private investigations from NIST, FEMA and the ASCE, fine. I have said this before. I could give two turds less.
Originally posted by esdad71
The sooner you accept that there are people out there trying to kill us, you might sleep better.
Originally posted by esdad71
University of Florida and NYU. Nothing to hide, just personal stuff you truly do not need ot know for this conversation. I studied this subject. I can design a building, to code, from foundation to showing the CAT 5 cable for the hi speed internet. That is all I stated. I never claimed to be a SE, only someone who studied it.
Originally posted by esdad71
Oh, I also think you are bull#ting about bieng a SEAL. If you were, you would know that this could not have been a demo with the training you should have received.
Originally posted by esdad71
Also, you know who actually did this because I am sure you have to know at least one guy killed by people tied to AQ or an offshoot faction.
Originally posted by esdad71
Are you MI-6 on another board?
Originally posted by esdad71
Not worth it...
The World Trade Center was destroyed just days after a heightened security alert was lifted at the landmark 110-story towers, security personnel said yesterday.
Daria Coard, 37, a guard at Tower One, said the security detail had been working 12-hour shifts for the past two weeks because of numerous phone threats. But on Thursday, bomb-sniffing dogs were abruptly removed.
"Today was the first day there was not the extra security," Coard said. "We were protecting below. We had the ground covered. We didn't figure they would do it with planes. There is no way anyone could have stopped that."
Originally posted by esdad71
You keep posting things I have read, and are coincidental and fit into a conspiracy theroy. Good for you. Sorry to hear you don't trust your government. Have a nice day. Like I said, I know my side of research, you feel yours.
Opinions are like a**h***, everyones got one. HAve a nice day.
"NIST has seen no evidence that the collapse of WTC 7 was caused by bombs, missiles, or controlled demolition."
- Two 6,000 gallon fuel tanks supplying a pressurized line possibly contributed to fires; tanks
were found to be damaged by debris and empty several months after collapse.
Originally posted by Spawwwn
My question, is why wait? why wait 8 years between the first attack to bring down the towers? IF this was part of a gov conspirocy, why wait so long to do this deed?
Originally posted by Spawwwn
Ok...and also, what did/does the government gain by attacking themselves and bringing down the buildings. Lets not forget a lot of law enforcement, EMT, and other state employed people died on 9/11. Why sacrifice people of your own government?
And what has the government gained as a whole? How did 9/11 benifent the american people? We have insane gas prices, started an 8 year war that has crippled our ecomony to the brink of collapse, and totally washed away any trust or respect that forgein nations have for us. I honestly don't see how the USA gov benefited from 9/11.
Originally posted by esdad71
congratulations, you did a little research. He is quoting someone else. Besides, I thought you were talking about the person who designed the building, Minoru Yamasaki.
Originally posted by Griff
I'm under the impression that Yamasaki is an architect? Since when do architects design the structural integrity of buildings? That would be Robertson....i.e. a professional structural engineer. Please, if you don't want structural engineers on your arse, quit saying architects design buildings (yes they design what they want the building to look like, but in the end, only the structural engineer can sign off on the design structurally).
Minoru Yamasaki was the architect, not a structural engineer. If you had ANY experience with creating a real building, you would know the extreme difference between an architect and structural engineer. I can sum it up for you since you don't know the difference. An architect draws, and visually designs the building. The structural engineer actually designs the buildings structure, and makes sure it stands, and can hold its weight.
The structural engineer of the WTC's is Leslie Robertson. Also, Minorus Yamasaki died in 1986, thats about 15 years before 911.