It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DigitalGrl
"A baby girl was airlifted to hospital after being found covered in human bites, it has been reported.
Police are investigating how the 17-week-old child came to have the teeth marks on her legs and other parts of her body"
the 21 year old mother said that her daughter just had a rash but the doctor decided differently, and had the baby airlifted to a hospital to be looked at by a specialist.
If the mother had any doing in this...she she get the crap beat out of her.
police however havent ruled out the possiblity that this was done by another child.
if another child did do this to a baby, how do you think the child should be dealt with?
heres the link:
17 week old baby covered in human bites
Digitalgrl
[edit on 10/01/2004 by DigitalGrl]
Originally posted by DigitalGrl
exactly, that is what pisses me off. and it isnt just one or two we are talking about here. the doctor says that the baby's body is COVERED with them.
this is ridiculous. and why as a mother you wouldnt take your kid into the doctor right away if they were only 17 weeks old and developed a wierd rash...i have no clue. seems like there are alot of incompitent people here.
kind regards,
digitalgrl
Originally posted by stumason
But, lookign around at other people and how they begave with their kids, it's shocking you don't need a license to be a parent. Many are incompetant and shouldn't have kids in a month of Sundays.
I am a parent myself and would say for certain that if any rash showed on my little girl she would be in the doctors quicker than you could say "oooh, thats an odd rash".