It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Mr_pointy
911myths.com...
You still haven't commented on the fact that the water pressure was low, meaning the sprinklers and hoses couldn't be used effectively to put out the fires.
Originally posted by Griff
The question remains.....at what temperature does aluminum glow in broad daylight and where the hotspots hot enough to keep this aluminum glowing for days and weeks as eyewitnesses have said the molten metal was there for days and weeks?
Originally posted by Mr_pointy
Where do they say the molten metal was at WTC7, and there are more sources of aluminum that just the planes at WTC1&2, such as the panels covering the building. You have to show the metal refered to is from WTC7, and that there are no other sources of metal.
The question remains.....at what temperature does aluminum glow in broad daylight and were the hotspots hot enough to keep this aluminum glowing for days and weeks as eyewitnesses have said the molten metal was there for days and weeks?
Originally posted by Mr_pointy
4. Pulling a building means to attach cables and pull it down, no explosives
Originally posted by Mr_pointy
That's presuming it's pure aluminum, given that other materials could have mixed with it, then the question is hard to answer.
Also Griff, what could CAUSE so much heat and the temperature range projected from the hot spot readings and to provide the molten material? Interesting hmmm..?
Can you provide then how the temperatures got that hot? But not to mention, notice the luminousity, the pictures of molten metal were more yellowish and brighter rather than the orange colors, not to mention, in one of the links I provided and what from Griff said, engineers and clean up workers found molten iron/steel, one of the two, read the Steven Jones link.
www.debunking911.com...
And by the way, mixing metals, what's that going to do? Form a chemical reaction at those temperatures to raise or lower some melting point? haha wtf, give me a break.
You keep claiming that, where's your reference point because from attribution sites to the matter of "Pull it", it's been claimed that when referring to pull it, refers to demolition, not pulling down the building with cables. And if its slang, how often to they bring down huge buildings like that with cables? Isn't sort of unconventional and safe, and no I'm not talking about broken down shanties and 2 story buildings either
Originally posted by Mr_pointy
Jones remains a crackpot, who's papers are never peer reviewed and are reject by the scientific community.
Yes but you still need a strong source to produce the heat don't you, while it's being dumped on by gallons of water. The underground coal fire is completely irrelevant as discussed before on this forum, if you want to discuss that and if it has relevance to this, then we might as well compare the Madrid building to WTC 7 and say it shouldn't of fell because the Madrid building didn't, you're not coming up with a source for the heat Mr_Pointy.
Well the relevance of that opinion shows your direct ignorance to the 9/11 issue in that you can not simply take a critical or objective view to anything contrary to the official story. When I consider works or papers from the otherside, I do so objectively and not with pre-concieved criticsm.
Originally posted by Mr_pointy
I don't have the qualifications to comment on his work, I have to rely on those that do, they say he's full of crap.
Can you actually point me to the quotes of these people who say he's "full of crap"? Thanks. BYU department of engineering will not do for me. Why? Because the engineering department at any college relies on the government to fund it. Being under the government's fiscal control, I don't think anyone would want to stir the pot. Jones can because he is doing it alone (meaning without the backing of the school). I'd like to go to that college and actually sit in a room where Jones and his collegues (specifically structural enginnering professors) talk about Jones' theories. I'm willing to bet that alot agree with him but have to put up the false facade to keep their government grants. Just my opinion.
Originally posted by Mr_pointy
Wow, your saying that the the people at BYU are so morally corrupt, that they'll suppress Jones and cover up the murder of 3000 people, adding more people to the conspiracy.
I noticed you didn't address the fact that his papers aren't peer reviewed.
www.debunking911.com...