It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by stumason
Originally posted by spacedoubt
Did they?
Did they warn Israel?
Maybe I'm wrong.
I'll have to check it out.
Hezbollah have been pretty forthright in their statements, clearly saying what will happen if Israel did this or that.
Not that I am condoning random barrages of cities.
Todays attack on the reservists was legitimate and to be honest, I think Hez should concentrate their Katushya barrages on the IDF positions massing on the border.
Would be alot more productive in a strategic sense and could end the war
Originally posted by ZMax
Nice logic...
Israel should tell Lebanon that every attack will be followed by the levelling of an village...It will be absolutly clear...
As for the today's attack - soldiers are legitimate target...how pitty they were in the cemetry when the missile struck them...
Originally posted by stumason
Heres one link I found by using HEZBOLLAH WARNING ROCKET ATTACK as the keywords.
It's also from Haaretz
Hezbollah said Friday that Israel should expect an attack on Haifa at any time.
Haaretz
That was the first link I clicked.
Originally posted by ZMax
This is to say thet the Qana bombing was the same... if I understand you right...
After all Israel told them that they will attack them???
Or the targeting of the civilan area without any military presence is alright with you?Because if it is you should know what I think about you (I was warned last time I said it here...but it felt good)...
Originally posted by stumason
Originally posted by ZMax
Nice logic...
Israel should tell Lebanon that every attack will be followed by the levelling of an village...It will be absolutly clear...
As for the today's attack - soldiers are legitimate target...how pitty they were in the cemetry when the missile struck them...
Well, they have been levelling villages anyway, haven't they?
Anyway, what exactly was wrong with my logic?
All I said was Hezbollah could get more bang for the buck if they stopped attacking Haifa and other towns, instead concentrating the barrages on the IDF formations that we see on the news all day.
Whats wrong with that? Seems perfectly logical to me.
Originally posted by Strangerous
This was just on BBC Radio 4.
An Israeli Arab was just describing how his town of 4,000 Israeli Arabs is not provided with a siren but the nearby (smaller) Israeli Jewish settlement is.
If the Arabs are lucky and the wind is blowing in the right direction they get some warning of rocket strikes, if not they get no warning.
Also the instructions of the 'home front defence organisation' are only issued in Hebrew and as most arabs don't read Hebrew they're, effectively, not provided with any safety instructions.
Anyone have any first-hand experience of this situation? - it seems inexcusable to ignore the safety of a significant proportion of your own population.
Originally posted by ZMax
With this kind of logic...nothing wrong...
But if they do it they will stop been terrorists...And surely the results will be less horrific...you know that the military knows how to protect themselves...And if they stop hiding in the lebanease populated areas and start wearing uniforms maybe I'll call them soldiers...
It's too much to ask...
Originally posted by stumason
Originally posted by ZMax
With this kind of logic...nothing wrong...
But if they do it they will stop been terrorists...And surely the results will be less horrific...you know that the military knows how to protect themselves...And if they stop hiding in the lebanease populated areas and start wearing uniforms maybe I'll call them soldiers...
It's too much to ask...
From what I've seen of Hezbollah, they do have uniforms. They do also fire from within populated areas, but this isn't forbidden, just morally dodgy.
As I said, I support niether side and look at this objectively. I am quite happy to criticise Hezbollah as much as the IDF
Originally posted by ZMax
But when people die even when there is a footage of the military activity only Israel is blamed...
Originally posted by Beachcoma
Originally posted by ZMax
But when people die even when there is a footage of the military activity only Israel is blamed...
Could it be because for all it's military might, superior technology, superior training, precision guided missiles linked to GPS, laser guided bombs and what-have-you, they still "miss"?
Originally posted by ZMax
there is a link with Hizballah fighters in populated area in this same site...feel free to tell witch one is their uniform...
As for the firing from civilian area...acording to the Geneva Convention it makes the area a legitimate target...But when people die even when there is a footage of the military activity only Israel is blamed
yes, and in that same thread there are alot of questions over wether they are Hezbollah at all.
Pics I have seen of Hezbollah on the BBC show men in uniform, body armour etc..
Originally posted by money order
there have been a lot of military installations based near to Arab settlements. So Israelis also use human shields.
Originally posted by Jewish_hammer
I want to tell you a faw intresting facts:
The housing fair that took place in the north last Sunday was aimed at attracting new residents to towns in the Galilee. But it turns out that not all Israeli citizens are welcome in these "community villages." Haaretz reporter David Ratner, who was present at the fair, received the impression that the welcoming approach of agents from the Misgav Regional Council suddenly disappears when the applicant is an Arab citizen - even if he is a doctor and department chair at Poriya Hospital, a factory owner or a journalist.
The result is that the 29 community villages of the Misgav Regional Council do not contain even a single Arab resident. Council head Erez Kreisler says that Arabs do not apply, because they know that there is no "cultural infrastructure" for their absorption. It is possible that he is right and that Arabs are reluctant to apply for places in a community village whose other residents are all Jews. But it is more likely that this reluctance stems from a recognition of reality.
Iman and Adel Ka'adan, who petitioned the High Court of Justice in 1995 because the community village of Katzir refused to accept them , are still not living there, even though the court ruled back in 2000 that they must be allowed to do so. Kreisler says that the court approved these communities' admission criteria and he stands by his right to pick and choose new residents, relying on regulations that allow such communities to examine whether residents would be socially suitable. Even if one accepts his argument, it is hard to believe that other Arabs, "socially suited" to life in Misgav's community villages, have not been found by this time.
Full story
Originally posted by Jewish_hammer
I am just telling the truth , Just beacus I makes me sick that a faw people want to belive in lies ...
Originally posted by Jewish_hammer
I am just telling the truth , Just beacus I makes me sick that a faw people want to belive in lies ...