It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by RedGolem
Mdv,
I think your a little quick to say that Iran will not lauch an attack on Isreal. All the point you made are good and valid, but something else I think you need to consider is every time a middle eastern laeder wanted to be viewed as a supreem leader of the middle eastern reagon, they always atacked Isreal. In this most recent series of events Iran is heavely invalved as they are useing Hezbollah so your point that Iran would not directly atack Isreal is proveing true, but when the nuke takes out a chunck of Isreal do you think there will be much question as to where in came from no matter how it was delevered? And as Iran is wageing a war by proxy against Isreal now why would they not step things up with more and better weapons?