It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
Not even close. That video shows the wrong approach angle and the wrong scale for the jet against the Pentagon. In other words, its a complete waste of time.
Originally posted by whokilledthekennedys
newsbusters.org...
The Mysterious release of the original 5 frames back in 2001 was inconclusive and the recent judicial watch videos which showed only a small nose cone (same as AGM cruise missile?) just added even more fuel to the fire of inside job.
[edit on 29-7-2006 by whokilledthekennedys]
Originally posted by jprophet420
this looks pretty convincing...
www.youtube.com...
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Oh let me guess. The fragile wings and tail should have ripped a cartoon hole right?
Originally posted by ANOK
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Oh let me guess. The fragile wings and tail should have ripped a cartoon hole right?
Yet that is exactly what happened at the WTC towers. Fragile wings cutting through construction steel like butter. Obviously steel is a lot stronger than aluminum.
Magically disappearing wings and engines at the pentagoon. Obviously kevlar reinforced concrete is stronger than aluminum. The plane managed to punch through the concrete sucking the wings and engine through the hole with it, then magically pulverize into nothing. Kinda like the WTC concrete...But by what? If the plane was strong enough to punch through the concrete, what made it self destruct? The furniture inside?
Something very odd about these planes imo...