It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The only likely source of the heat great enough to actually "melt" significant quantities of iron in the piles (or even just raise so much of it to red-hot or to 2000F) would be chemical energy (i.e., "combustion" of some sort). Professor Jones assumes that all the carbonaceous "combustible" matter in the "piles" would have burned away long before the time that the red-hot and molten iron was discovered (weeks after the collapse of the WTC towers). Perhaps it did, by weeks after the collapse. But Professor Jones obviously does not comprehend that the hot, red-hot and molten IRON IS COMBUSTIBLE matter.
Professor Jones assumes that all the carbonaceous "combustible" matter in the "piles" would have burned away long before the time that the red-hot and molten iron was discovered (weeks after the collapse of the WTC towers).
www.physics.byu.edu...
[The] previously molten metal has very little (if any) Chromium yet abundant Manganese => we rule out molten structural steel (as a major component)
Originally posted by Xenesthad
From what i've heard Thermate which is Thermite with added sulphur and maganese in was used to melt the iron to fell the buildings
Originally posted by DeadEagle
To you, and others who believe thermite brought down the towers, have any of you even seen thermite in action?
Originally posted by wecomeinpeace
For #3, I'll let HowardRoark tell you about how anyone who is religious is a raving, lying lunatic out to fool the world with bogus science for some bizarre, unfathomable plot.
Originally posted by wecomeinpeace
However the oxidizing iron phenomenon may indeed explain how the pile maintained its elevated temperatures for weeks after the hypothetical thermite was exhausted, which has always been a bone of contention.
Originally posted by HowardRoark
So, if you will admit that there was ample fuel for the fires to burn,
Originally posted by whokilledthekennedys
the towers only burned for 50 minutes or so. How is it even remotely possible that was enough time for the 47 key columns to reach the tempatures needed for a total failure and collapse?
Originally posted by HowardRoark
The look up the Euler equation for column buckling.
Then we will talk.
Originally posted by wecomeinpeace
To date, there has not been a satisfactory theory provided for how the steel was brought to temperatures sufficient to melt it, or to trigger this oxidizing effect, other than thermite.
[edit on 2006-7-27 by wecomeinpeace]
Burning radiation is absorbed in steel so quickly that steel heats up immediately over its melting point 1585 °C (approx. 2890 °F) and above its boiling point around 3000 C (approx. 5430 °F).
Originally posted by Duhh
Nukes?? Show one shred of evidence for that please. Your Llnk or, opinion, or whatever? That is so rich,( loud laughter here ) wanna see it. Ooops, or was that just one of those" well this could cause that" CT moments ?