It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Source
[16] And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
[17] And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
[18] Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.
On October 22, 2002, Applied Digital Solutions received word from the FDA that they would not regulate the chip under FDA regulations as it was to be used for identification and security purposes. ADS President, Scott Silverman stated shortly afterward, "We'll now go into high gear with our sales, marketing and distribution plans in the U.S.," No time was wasted and they went into high gear putting already well laid plans and resources into action.
On October 24, an ADS press release boasted, "The first 100,000 registrants and all qualified ADSX shareholders will be eligible for a special introductory savings of $50 at the time of "chipping." Details on the "Get Chipped" promotion will be posted soon "
Continued at source.
Originally posted by nyeff
Although I do not like the idea of being "chipped",where does it say get chipped or go to jail.It seems pretty voluntary to me.
Originally posted by quiet one
as a realist, i'm worried that government may force it upon people, and abuse it.
- qo.
Originally posted by quiet one as a realist, i'm worried that government may force it upon people, and abuse it.
Originally posted by quiet oneI think it should be done only a voluteer base, with some news laws who will protect those who don't want to have the chip.
It's essentially a glorified dog-tag; medical record and so forth.
Originally posted by nyeff
I think we can agree that mandatory chipping woul be a bad idea.But what about chipping convicts that are going to be paroled?Violent criminals that have murdered,raped,molested children,should they be chipped so the police,FBI can keep an eye on them?