posted on Nov, 2 2007 @ 01:35 AM
moving from the "project image from camera on to shirt" concept, which will work as true invisibility camouflage only from one direction (behind the
camera) and with no depth perception (ie it will look 3d with one eye closed ony and the focal point will be different to that of the background) to a
proper invisibility suit based on this technique requires two things:
1) small very low visibility cameras facing in many directions (this seems very feasable Ive seen publicliy available cameras that are TINY, who knows
what the black ops have access to). These capture the background image in all directions around the object. Actually theoretically you really want to
capture the background image in all outward directions from all points on the surface of the object, but I think this is probably not necessary to get
a convincing invisibility effect. What you gain form these and some (probably very computationally intensive) computer processing is the colour and
brightness of light that needs to be "projected" in all outward directions from all points on the surface of the object. IE:
pick a point on a spherical object. if you look at that point straight on, it should project the light intensity and colour that a camera on the
opposite side of the globe sees looking straight out. however if you look at that same point from another angle, it should appear a different
colour/brightness based on whatever is directly behind it on that angle. this brings us to required technology two
2) a surface "screen" technology that has "pixels" that can be a different colour depending on the angle you look at them from. This is also a
requirement for flat panel true 3d screens, and there exists just such a screen
www.holografika.com...
so given enough small multidirectional (ie wide angle) cameras, the right software, and a surface coating of something like the holografika display, a
digitised but otherwise correct invisibility can be attained (within the contrast and colour gamut range limitations of the cameras, and, more likely,
the holografika display) that even has a correct "focal point" for the background. If the cameras and screen have enough
contrast/resolution/directional resolution and the camera lenses are tiny enough not to be seen it will be invisible*
so what do we have: all enabling technologies available in the public domain, and HUGE military advantage to invisibility therefore huge dollars would
have been spent trying to develop it... I give it a very high probability of having been achieved.
* actually thinking about that, lensed camera lenses themselves would be like little glass beads floating in mid air, so some way to hide them is
probably necessary. I think many tiny "pinhole" style cameras with the image sensor in a small half sphere shape behind the opening (therefore
capturing all entering angles of light) would work better and be far less visible