It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
John, can you tell us from where your ancestors came from in your family tree lineage? I know you have spoken of your father and his successes maybe I missed you talking about from where your family roots started.
so you flew one of these at mach 1.7!!
the F-104 was one of the first aircraft designed with the swept forward
how did it handle?
was it hard to land?
I would think so, because those little wings don't produce a lot of lift at slow speeds.
p.s. flight school is getting really expensive, I live in P.R. and I am paying $150 an hour! do you think that is too much?
Originally posted by John Lear
It was a jet and rocket powered F-104. There were 3 of them built and Chuck Yeager through is incompetence. arrogance and lack of precision flying ability destroyed one and the program was cancelled.
Touchdown speed in 170 knots.
Did anyone smack him over the head after he pulled that one? I would've!!
oh and heres a picture of a really nice CF-104D, maybe it'll bring back some old memories..
Originally posted by johnlear
It was a jet and rocket powered F-104. There were 3 of them built and Chuck Yeager through is incompetence. arrogance and lack of precision flying ability destroyed one and the program was cancelled.
Originally posted by johnlear
I flew a plain vanilla CF-104D with a J-79.
Originally posted by Access Denied
John your jealously and poor taste is showing. You have no right to insult someone with real flying experience.
Got any proof of that?
When ATS gets their video program up and running I will post the video that Bob Lazar made of my checkout in the F-104.
You know, like we could have gotten some REAL pilots to fly the F-104 and we all just stood around and pretended like it was us!
Originally posted by Clandestino
Hey access, why are you flipping out on the guy? All John said was that he
crashed because he was "incompetent and lacked precision flying ability".
John your jealously and poor taste is showing. You have no right to insult someone with real flying experience. Chuck Yeager was a brave man, you on the other hand…
Originally posted by johnlear
I have no reason to insult Chuck he was my friend. I merely state the truth as I know it. He may have been be brave but he was also foolhardy and lacked good judgement. He lost a perfectly good airplane (NF-104 AST) because he attempted a maneuver for which he was not qualified or briefed. The loss of this airplane unnecessarily caused the cancellation of a program that cost many people their jobs.
Originally posted by johnlear
Further, Yeager was not the first person to break the sound barrier. Slick Goodlin was. And in that exact same airplane before it was turned over to the Air Force by the contractor. The U.S. wanted an Air Force hero not a government contractor hero to break the sound barrier. The only reason Gen. Boyd picked Chuck was because he was the most expendable. .
You're complete lack of any factual historical aviation knowledge is astounding... but not at all surprising.
Originally posted by Access Denied
“FWIW I can tell you that I work at one of the facilities identified in the DP briefing document as being involved in ARVs and although it’s more than likely we would be the ones who would be working on it if in fact an alien spaceship had ever been retrieved,…”
originally posted by Access Denied
“one of the facilities identified in the DP briefing document as being involved in ARVs”
originally posted by Access Denied
“we would be the ones who would be working on it if in fact an alien spaceship had ever been retrieved”
Originally posted by Access Denied
Promoting stuff like this guarantees you won’t be taken seriously.
originally posted by Access Denied
“FWIW I can tell you that I work at one of the facilities identified in the DP briefing document as being involved in ARVs and although it’s more than likely we would be the ones who would be working on it if in fact an alien spaceship had ever been retrieved.”
originally posted by Access Denied
“a story which could actually (most likely IMO) be just someone’s fantasy… not very scientific.”
Originally posted by johnlear
Now, Access Denied, with all due respect, according to your resume which you posted in your current search for a job, you actually work for ERC, Inc. (based in Huntsville, Alabama) which is a small company (450 employees) with a small contract with AFRL (Air Force Research Labs).
Originally posted by johnlear
And also, according to your resume, you have an Associate of Science in Electronic Engineering Technology. (That’s a 2 year degree.) Now, Access Denied, do you want us here at ATS to believe that AFRL (Air Force Research Laboratory) would give ERC,Inc. and their engineer (you) with a 2 year degree in electronic engineering an alien spaceship to work on?
Originally posted by johnlear
Not that I am doubting your word but do you think that Dr. Ernest Wu, the CEO and President of the company you work for will back you up on this alien spaceship thing?
Government
NASA
* Ames Research Center
* George C. Marshall Space Flight Center
* Jet Propulsion Laboratory
* Langley Research Center
* Glenn Research Center
DoD
* Air Force Arnold Engineering Development Center
* Air Force Research Laboratory Propulsion Directorate
* Army Aviation and Missile Command
* Army Redstone Technical Test Center
* DARPA
* Office of Naval Research
DOE
* DOE Headquarters Offices
* DOE Operations Offices
* Argonne National Laboratory
* DOE Energy Technology Centers
Commercial
Boeing
Burns and Roe
Busek Corporation
Calsonic
Calspan
Computer Sciences Corporation
Cortana Corporation
Executive Training Resources
Gilbert Commonwealth, Inc.
Honeywell (Allied Signal)
Hughes
Lockheed Martin
Mactec
McDonnell Douglas
Micro Craft
MSE, Inc.
Orbital Sciences Corp.
Pratt and Whitney
STD Corporation
Sverdrup Technology, Inc.
Teledyne Brown Engineering
Tennessee Technological Foundation
Textron Defense Systems
The University of Tennessee Space Institute
Thiokol Corporation
Originally posted by zorgon
I was linked to Defense Department documents that include this section by LANL and the AFRL
Teleportation Physics Study
DTIC Copy - AFRL-PR-ED-TR-2003-0034
APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED
AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY
AIR FORCE MATERIEL COMMAND
EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE CA 93524-7048
Two Kinds of vm-Teleportation Identified for the Air Force Study
• Traversable Wormhole engineered as a “STARGATE”
(via Einstein’s General Relativity Theory field equations, 1915)
• Faster-Than-Light (FTL) solutions of the Polarizable-Vacuum Representation of General Relativity (Davis,Puthoff, Maccone, 2003; , Puthoff, 1999, 2000) induce a flat-spacetime version of the Stargate via engineering the vacuum EM parameters.
John, I really think you owe my boss an apology.
Originally posted by Access Denied
Originally posted by johnlear
John, I really think you owe my boss an apology.
Sure, coming right up. Happy to oblige.
Dear Dr. Wu, . . .
Hell, according to your boy Zorgon, the AFRL and ERC is working on Teleportation and Stargates so why not something as mundane as a UFO?...