It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
One thing that I was wondering and maybe John has a thought on this is that if we have such advanced technology as to be able to zoom about the universe then why fight wars in an obviously primitive manner? Or spend billions developing aircraft such as the F-22?
Does that help clear up some of the confusion?
Originally posted by Access Denied
Besides, there's nothing special about it.
Originally posted by inspiringyouth
John, You mentioned that the 115 was somewhere in downtown LA? Where would that somewhere be? If 115 can put off Anti-Matter, which im pretty sure I read in one of your posts at the beggining of this thread the one with the lantern and dry ice. So with a little bit of cloning and experimentation here inter-stellar travel is at our fingertips! Think about it man, I won't lie im young, Im 15 years old but Anti-Matter is one thing I know alot about and if it gives of Anti-Matter then it is exactly what is required for an Anti-Matter sorta battery, that could run a ship that could travel vast distances at vast speeds, Anti-Matter is a magnificent energy source but is very hard to create we have one way to create it and its taken 40 years to get micro weights of it... Just think about how much 115 could help mankind we just need to know where it is, and a little help working with it...
Originally posted by bobby3
It's nice to find a current discussion on this, as I was talking with someone on this topic a couple days ago (what I could remember).
I was talking about gravity being instantaneous & travling in a wave, to which the person I was speaking was totally confused on.
I actually couldn't remember if the instantaneous idea of gravity was from Lazar's story or if I had picked it up somewhere else, but I see John stated that it is instentaneous here.
John, is there any written text some place online that talks about both gravity being a wave & being instentaneous together, maybe something from lazar??? Just wondering...
...
I appologize for typo's, I've always been a terrible speller...
Originally posted by johnlear
Try boblazar.com
Originally posted by Ectoterrestrial
Which question do we have to ask you, John?
Originally posted by Matyas
Actually I think Ecto has it really going on. There are a few progressives in here. Maybe we should be asking him the questions!
John, this is all too fascinating. You are a catalyst for change. My thesis is since we cannot absolutely prove with observation and corrobating evidence the existence of other life beyond our biosphere, our life is therefore a singularly unique phenomena of the morphogenetic field. Certain theories can support my thesis both directly and indirectly, the latter such as multiple worlds and the former such as nonexistence of space/time. But as theories they are not absolutely proveable.
Your antithesis, based upon observation and corrobating evidence that is still not absolutely proveable assumes the opposite camp. The bearing it has on my thesis is about as interactive as two deaf and blind men passing in the middle of the night. So adopting the synthesis results in my viewpoint shifting from one of observation to the new perspective of the observer. In the synthesis I become the paradox living in a quasistable macroquantum state accepting both cases as factual.
Now if no one opens the door on me I'll be fine...
ROTFLMAO
If reproducibility may be a problem conduct the test only once.
I'm not following you here. Are you talking about pseudo-science, or the state-of-the-art in LPUs (Least Publishable Units)?
Anyways, I'm really curious if there is some way to test for a gap. Some knee-jerk reflex or something.....
But seriously, if 115 has the properties John and Bob assert to have observed, and people and others are using it in our general vicinity, could we detect its use?
I know GR physicists have been pushing for years to get funding for their orbitting rod and satellite cluster experiments, to no avail. Is there something we could do on the ground?
He's being facetious here. The problem is can we know something to be true but unless we can gets the components to prove it we can't prove it and guess who has control of the components.
I don't want to belabor this but if a problem is already solved why would they want to fund it again? want and thats infinitely more fun than being tied to one little part of one little black project.
No
Originally posted by PapooseS4
Bobby3, try this web site for some info on the speed of gravity.
www.gravitywarpdrive.com...
I know. I was trying to drag Mr. texbook into a bar fight. Never mind.
Originally posted by johnlear
Originally posted by Ectoterrestrial
I know. I was trying to drag Mr. texbook into a bar fight. Never mind.
I hate it when I think I know whats going on and I don't. Sorry.