It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Cadbury
reply to post by DeusEx
How about enlisting the services of judges who can actually read a manuscript and judge it competently, this time? A moderator I respect once described them to me as "literary lightweights," and, quite frankly, if they are; they have no place being allowed anywhere near a panel of judges responsible for reviewing literature. How also about the "contest" being run by a moderator who can actually adhere to his own rules, and not break them just to spite an "enemy?"
Would be a good place to start before "mucking about" with frilly theme ideas, niet?
Pirates.
Originally posted by DeusEx
So, are we throwing a hissy fit here?
Because so far, all the judges are volunteers, spending their free time going through the stories, reading them. If they don't qualify as beret-wearing 'literary heavyweights' in your mind, you are more than welcome to participate in a contest more suited to your artistic needs.
When I judged, I went on two things- personal opinion and grammar. Simple. I have no clue how the other judges ranked stories. There were no specific scales for symbolism, metaphor, how 'literary' your work was, etc.
You are more than welcome to take your work elsewhere, as I said.
This isn't a hardcore writing competition, this is mostly amateur hour run by everyday folks willing to donate their time.
Originally posted by Cadbury
Think about what you write before you write it. Grammar and literacy are interconnected, are they not? If you're judging it on grammar and storyline then how are you not judging how "literary" the work was?
"Mostly amateur hour?" What exactly is meant by that?
Originally posted by DeusEx
Context. The use of the word 'literary' by yourself seems to equate to 'obscure, artsy and whimsical'. My choice words is perhaps poor, but then again, I'm just another guy.
I like what I like, and when my spell-check dings something, I check it out. We don't vet stories for things such as, oh, fanfiction content until the judging has already begun.
The stories are generally not written by persons with formal training of any sort. There are few English majors and fewer professional writers competing, if any at all of either. Maybe there are a few, but by and large people entering the contest are just having fun.
The judges and mods again are amateurs, volunteering their time. We are amateurs, sinking hours into something we find enjoyable. Perhaps you are a professional- but then, why are you kicking up problems for a small-potatoes writing contest that hasn't even begun on an obscure conspiracy forum?
Are you done seeking offense in my words?
Because one does assume you have other contests to enter, and better things to do than look down on the mods and judges who are trying to run a contest in the easiest way possible for everyone.
DE
I'm guessing your idea of talent is bland, generic, ill-conceived and incorrectly formatted piss with dialogues that clunk out off the page like the work of a child?
Originally posted by AccessDenied
Oh please excuse the rest of us for not meeting your standards. What exactly is your problem?
If you deem us not worthy of you..by all means..be gone.
And for the record, in my opinion, when one must resort to insults and name calling over such a trivial issue..YOU, SIR..are the one with not a leg to stand on.
Don't act as if you speak for all of us that enjoy the writing contests as they are.