posted on Jul, 16 2006 @ 01:20 AM
I see where you're coming from laiguana but it is difficult to understand how anyone would say that Bush didn't have the intelligence to know that
opting for fewer troops and relying on the Northern Alliance would result in less professional performance. Hindsight being 20/20 of course, we now
know that the "less professional performance" of the Northern Alliance lead to Osama's escape.
So just to clarify, and I think I'll make this my last question and stop pumping you for answers, you don't believe anybody told Bush that relying
on terrorist warlords to fight a war on terror might have some serious drawbacks?