It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TerraX
www.billymeier.com...
Billy:..."On a photo appearing in an article of the Tages-Anzeiger she actually identified some similarity between the "Wedding Cake Ships" and the outer edge of a barrel cover. Evidence shows that barrels with such lids were first produced in 1986, while I—and this can also be substantiated—took the photos of the "Wedding Cake Ships" in 1982, four years earlier. When I asked Ptaah about this matter, he gave the following plausible explanation that seems rather clear to me although it does sound a bit peculiar at first. Anyone familiar with the dark and still unexplained stories about the "German Gyro Disks," respectively "Flying Disks," would probably concede that Ptaah's explanation does provide the truth.
Excerpt of the 254th Contact Report from Tuesday, November 28, 1995:
Ptaah:...As far back as the 1920s we worked with flying devices you have named the 'Wedding Cake Ship,' but they were only available for operations on Earth toward the end of the 1970s. This particular type of flying device was designed specifically for the Earth, and for this reason we endeavored to transmit all of the necessary data regarding the vehicles' shape to terrestrial scientists, in the form of telepathic impulses, to assist them in developing flying disks on Earth. The telepathic impulses were primarily directed to space travel technologists, as I shall call these individuals. This scientific group consisted mainly of German engineers, to whom we transmitted precise plans for the shape of the hull, along with some technical details we considered justifiable. These German scientists actually built experimental units using the plans that eventually led to the construction of somewhat workable flying disks. In accordance with our motives at that time, these disks were to be used to establish an air force that would be instrumental in achieving an early and worldwide peace. Political machinations, however, changed all of this very quickly into a war effort, which prompted us to discontinue the transmission of any further telepathic impulses to the German scientists. Moreover, these developments forced us to drop the project completely shortly after we intentionally transmitted some misinformation, which would render these flying disks ineffectual for war purposes. Some copies of the blueprints somehow survived since we were unable to retrieve every one of them. This presented no problem, however, since the remaining blueprints were extremely incomplete when they vanished. This last remnant consisted essentially only of drawings which merely depicted the outer rim and undercarriage of the flying object. Details of the lower half and the upper structure were no longer included. And it is precisely this outer rim with its undercarriage that survived on drawings over the past several decades—only to reappear around 1965. This reappearance occurred without our knowledge, for we had long lost interest in what had become useless drawings as far as we were concerned. Until now that is. You informed Florena that some of you realized this shape of large container lids exist, which indeed look exactly like the lower rim and underside of our flying objects and had a more than fleeting resemblance to the same structural features. And since you yourself provided one of these covers to clarify the fact, it was very simple for us to compare the receptacle cover with construction details of the flying device. We, too, noticed the stunning similarity and began focusing our attention on this matter. We thoroughly investigated the entire situation and discovered that the old, newly re-emerged drawings were used for the design and production of these receptacle covers. The covers were completely different from anything the designers had previously produced. Normally they designed lids with simple lines and never with shapes that could be called futuristic and complicated. This, then, is how the shape of the container covers came about, which, as I mentioned earlier, strikingly resemble the lower rim section and undercarriage on our flying devices."
Originally posted by Long Lance
let's sum it up: intervention is generally a no-no,
Did the pleadians say that? Or are you lumping all people who claim contact into one big category and since many of them say that then you assume the pleadians do not interfere?
but since terra is such a mess, talking to a 'prophet' or messenger if you will is OK, within limits of course...
then we have a crudely designed ship intended for channeling to mostly German scientists... the mind boggles,
where do they claim that their ships are intended for channeling? What if in some cosmic since they were connected to the Germans? Wouldn't it make since that when they came to earth they would visit their own? Perhaps the Germans who are here now were "left behind" at some point in the past when they were here before and left? Is it then unfair if when they return they don't visit the Chinese?
imagine this was true, favouritism, violation of the directive
What directive? Your summations are based upon assumptions that you have made.
Originally posted by Long Lance
even if you deny the existance of a directive,
I do not deny the existence of a directive. I don't know and I've not heard any evidence that it does exist. If anyone knows where this directive is mentioned besides startrek I'd be interested in hearing. I am not close minded. I simply do not know.
the paragraph you posted, if genuine would still be an admission of meddling with terran affairs.
So what is your point? Did I say that aliens did or did not meddle?
(in a very biased way i might add) if this was true, i'd have to say thx for giving our orwellian friends in strong positions tools we can't possibly counter while giving us (everyone else) some text - ie. the short end of the stick. brilliant.
Instead of replying in a way that seems to somehow connect to what I say you simply bring new accusations. It's as though you are trying to put people on the defensive.
sorry if i'm not up-to date on plejaren ethics, but isn't that the entire point of the meier contact reports? to bring to our attention the dleterious effects of religion and all, which was alledgedly spawned by ET intervention a few millenia ago?
Again, you're not saying anything that I can see that even remotely responds to anything I have said and just seems to be another accusation intended to put people on the defensive.
[edit on 10-7-2006 by Long Lance]
Originally posted by Long Lance
i don't think i'm accusing anyone,
Sounded to me like I was being blamed for the orwellian system.
if your premise is that these contacts (not going into the question of veracity here)
This is going to have to be my last post. I'm spending all my time just correcting you. Can you at least give me a quote so that I can see what I've said that makes you think I said that these contacts are a good thing. You read into everything I say and don't understand my points. If you want to continue to discuss this then you must provide some quote of something I said so I can try to figure out what I have said that you are making reference to. That is the only way I can help you understand what I actually meant by my words. I am neutral. I have not made up my mind about anything. I made no statement about good, bad, ethical, etc. Only that what Ptaah is saying happened may very well have happened. The German scientists saw a UFO that made one of them say that they (the Americans) had gotten everything. That is because he believed the Americans had built the ship that he saw from his plans. It seems a plausable explanation to me that the Pleadians were putting thoughts into his head that he thought were his own ideas. He wasn't channeling on purpose here.
are intended to help, then the paragraph about channelled UFO plans goes pretty much diametrically against it, or is an example of a serious miscalculation combined with substantial naivity. I'm sorry, but i doubt someone from space faring civilsation would make such a mistake. note that i'm not convinced in any way, so i'm merely playing out the scenario in my mind and try to imagine the situation.
You are saying that you can't believe Ptaah's explanation because he would have known what would have happened and that the ships would have been used for war and not for peaceful purposes. I can't comment on that because I really just don't know. It could have been a test to see what they would have been used for. Who knows, had they been peaceful they may have attained to the number 1290. It is a German number I think. Admiral Byrd had his experience with the Germans at the North Pole on 1-29. Ptaah said they started building the ships in the 1920's. This may have been the set time for this kind of contact to occur and this kind of sharing of technology to occur. But we weren't ready because we wouldn't use such things for peace .If what I am told is correct it was a Germane that influenced Daniel and his numbers had to do with the Germans at least in part. I certainly do not expect you to take my word on such things.
i faintly remember a passage, in one of their articles, about interference with earth and associated rules, but i was so far unable to retrieve it. it is true that my wording was influenced by star trek, though.
I haven't read all the contact notes. I thought you were a believer in the directive because of star trek. Good to hear you are not that naive.
Originally posted by NoNik
I don't know about anyone else, but every time I see this dudes "UFO's", I get childhood flashbacks. Not of alien abduction, or scarey UFO sightings, but of once a month Communion service at church. I swear this thing he fashioned his model out of are the large silver and gold all decked-out serving trays that hold like 25 shot glasses each, and the wafer trays always smooth and contoured.
Get a few different styles of those, add the orbs from a large aluminum Christmas door decoration, or xmas tree specialty orbs, or maybe even large ball-bearings, and whalaa !!
Hell, I thunker I might just build me wun of dem dar oofu's !! lol
NN
Originally posted by TerraX
"Garbage can lid part of Billy Meier UFO?"
On the following website the connection is made between a garbage can lid and a portion of the Billy Meier UFO, 'the weddingcake ship'.
thebiggestsecret.online.fr...
Scroll down halfway and notice the erie similarity between the lid and the bottom portion of the Billy Meier UFO. Perhaps a moderator can put the respective photographs in this thread for better viewing and discussion.
Originally posted by vestri
But the video, the obvious metallic structure and perfectly welded construction, and other high-resolution imagery of this craft that is freely available on the net puts this nice little garbage lid story to rest.
Originally posted by vestri
ahh bugga it! Why should i bother discussing this matter any further with a bunch of people here who are not only in denial, but also being foolish in their analysis.
Originally posted by vestri
ahh bugga it! Why should i bother discussing this matter any further with a bunch of people here who are not only in denial, but also being foolish in their analysis. They would rather believe that most of all these other (hoax) UFO contact case's are real, but not the Meier UFO case which is the only one that is real, and is the only one with proven hard evidence material in it to back it up.
Sorry but you people here get a big fat 0 for your research and analysis capabilities.