It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
The best facial recognition software is the human brain.
I'm not sure what you mean by the coveruppies comment BTW.
And have you looked at Osama, then at the man in the video?
What I'm saying is, if there can't be a consensus of eyewitness accounts, then we can't rely on those acounts. We have to look at the evidence, and so far I've seen none..
Yes there is, I've seen it and collected it after burning it myself. I said it was found with molten steel. Steel can't melt at the temperatures that supposedly brought dwn the building, so the thermite is the only reasonable explaination. give me a better one and maybe I'll change my mind.
So, you're saying that after they crashed into the towers, there was no swaying? well there was, and it was a lot less than the swaying that high winds can do.
they were security cameras. I doubt anyone reviewed them before they were confiscated, what with all the explosions and sirens and all.
But this NOT the first time a black box does NOT survive.
Black boxes have survived much greater impacts. Tat's wht they were designed to do.
Yep. Would war be waged over 10 deaths? Would Haliburton have such a contract if it were only a few casualties?
Originally posted by kipman725
www.gieis.uni.cc...
I don't think you have reserched the thermite claim enough. The sample also had magnesium and sulpher which along with aluminium and iron oxide is used to produce a type if thermite used for ctting structural steel. The sample also had evedince in the changes in its structure to show that it had been heated far more intensley than any office fire.
Originally posted by aecreate
I think its thermate, not thermite.
And I believe this is the source
Thermate is supposedly military grade, not sure though,
I believe its all explained in that paper.
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
And building 7?
THe problem is that if one aspect is shown to be pre planned, (building 7) then the whole thing ends up on 'conspiracy' list.
Originally posted by HowardRoark
Reallynobody, you seem to have a good sense of reality. Welcome to the dark side.
Certainly all the theories are nonsense, many of them are actually pretty funny.
Enjoy your self here.
Originally posted by aecreate
I think its thermate, not thermite.
And I believe this is the source
Thermate is supposedly military grade, not sure though,
I believe its all explained in that paper.
Originally posted by reallynobody
Claim 4) There was thermite found in the remains of the WTC rubble! This means that it was all a set-up.
Counterclaim) Thermite is a big word. Thermite is a mixture of powdered aluminium and iron oxide (rust). So what did people find that got all the tin-hatties excited? Microscopic bits of aluminium and rusty iron.
Considering that two mostly aluminium planes just crashed into two steel and iron filled towers: is it TRULY surprising?
I guess researchers published findings on analysis of the rubble, and some conspiracy theorists took the wrong conclusions.
Originally posted by reallynobody
Claim 5) No building ever collapsed because of a fire!
Counterclaim) Did those buildings had planes fly into them?
(On a side not I doubt that no building ever collapsed after a fire, some buildings rely heavily on wood reinforcements, so at most no STONE building ever collapsed because of fire. Although I doubt that as well.)
Claim 6) The two towers where engineered to withstand impacts of planes. This proves that planes could not have brought it down!
Counterclaim) Was it tested? Where there planes flown against the towers which then bounced back or something?
Originally posted by reallynobody
A part of a French airport terminal collapsed once because of lousy architecture.
If it is so difficult designing something based on a known concept, I can imagine
how difficult it must be to design something that you can't even test.
Originally posted by reallynobody
Claim 1) Osama was not behind it because he wears a ring in one of the videos. Islamics aren't SUPPOSED to wear jewellery so it couldnt have been Bin Laden so it must have been American agents in disguise.
Counterclaim) Islamics aren't allowed to wear jewellery, but they aren't allowed to have their picture taken or put on film either. Osama doesn't have a problem with that does he?! There have been terrorist attacks on friday too, even though friday is an islamic restday. Guess Islamic terrorists don't care about religious rules afterall when it suits them.
3) How could anyone mistake a missile for a plane? If they thought it was a plane then it ain't a missile. There is a HUGE difference between them, the sound alone is deafening if it was a missile. Go watch some footage of both.
Originally posted by Semiazas
3) How could anyone mistake a missile for a plane? If they thought it was a plane then it ain't a missile. There is a HUGE difference between them, the sound alone is deafening if it was a missile. Go watch some footage of both.
Missiles seem to sound almost exactly the same at as a 747 when it is cruising at top speed. Ever heard a plane take off? Imagine that times about three.
Originally posted by reallynobody
Originally posted by Semiazas
3) How could anyone mistake a missile for a plane? If they thought it was a plane then it ain't a missile. There is a HUGE difference between them, the sound alone is deafening if it was a missile. Go watch some footage of both.
Missiles seem to sound almost exactly the same at as a 747 when it is cruising at top speed. Ever heard a plane take off? Imagine that times about three.
OK I suppose there are many types of missiles. But the eye witnesses clearly describe a plane. Whas it a missile disguised as a plane? What a dangeous thing to do anyway, someone might have had a camera pointing at the right time and then the gov would be screwed! Sure lucky thing that didnt happen hehe.
Let's say it really was a missile. What happened to the plane? Not easy to get rid of with all the airtraffic radar and people around. Did they use cloaking fields?
Teleporters?