It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by thermopolis
But, did we go to court and try every Nazi killed in WWII? Or how about every Japanses soldier in a banzi attack?
The NYT is aiding the enemies of the state by providing intell...........
Yes... the game is on and we're being played.
However, the players forgot a few things...
Boston Globe
But a search of public records -- government documents posted on the Internet, congressional testimony, guidelines for bank examiners, and even an executive order President Bush signed in September 2001 -- describe how US authorities have openly sought new tools to track terrorist financing since 2001. That includes getting access to information about terrorist-linked wire transfers and other transactions, including those that travel through SWIFT.
"There have been public references to SWIFT before," said Roger Cressey, a senior White House counterterrorism official until 2003. "The White House is overreaching when they say [The New York Times committed] a crime against the war on terror. It has been in the public domain before."
Counterterrorism Blog
Suggestions that SWIFT and other similar transactions should be monitored by investigative agencies dealing with terrorism, money laundering and other criminal activity have been out there for some time. An MIT paper discussed the pros and cons of such practices back in 1995. Canada's Financial Intelligence Unit, FINTRAC,, for one, has acknowledged receiving information on Canadian origin SWIFT transactions since 2002. Of course, this info is provided by the banks themselves.
While monitoring SWIFT-handled transfers is a useful tool in identifying and tracking certain suspicious transactions, its importance should not be overstated. The information in SWIFT's hands is no better than the information which it is provided by the banks handling the transactions at both ends. And there is already an obligation on banks in the US and Europe to report all "suspicious transactions".
Originally posted by marg6043
How spying on the financial activities of private citizens all around the world with the excused of tracking terrorist is legal.
Have you ever thought about that one? no?
How many terrorist are out there that are rich enough to be tracked internationally?
Perhaps some but no many.
No, . . . tracking all financial information from private citizens is the issue here . . . but for what reason.
If the government wants to know how terrorist get finance they should track Saudi Arabia and their business partner including the many here in the US link with government positions and big oil interest.
Originally posted by zenlover28
Very true, but again I think it is ultimately going to end up being a non-issue for you as well.
They won't be selling very many newspapers if they continue to show nothing but hypocrisy, IMO.
But, anyhow I just heard where the Belgium government has now washed their hands of anymore of this....which has me confused.
The point is about tracking a private citizen's financial activities only if that private citizen has been TAGGED or NOTED for his/her role in some questionable or suspicious activities with certain people or organizations by the federal authorities IN THE PAST.
NYT went to the website and read the magazine produced by SWIFT, thats all. NO SECRET!
EDIT: ACTUAL WEBSITE!!!
www.swift.com...
AND THE MAGAZINE!!!!!!
www.swift.com...
[edit on 28-6-2006 by Johnny Ohm]
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Originally posted by thermopolis
But, did we go to court and try every Nazi killed in WWII? Or how about every Japanses soldier in a banzi attack?
That's very different, and I think most people realize why. In those cases, we're looking at declared war between nations where state-sponsored armies engaged state-sponsored armies.
The NYT is aiding the enemies of the state by providing intell...........
What "intel"? This information was already in the public domain. I'll repeat something I posted earlier this morning:
Originally posted by thermopolis
So it the current 'attacker" is smart enough not to have a central "authority" or state, that means the US must treat them as individual crimminals........thats just silliness to be kind.
The problem NTY's defenders
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
War is a declaration between nation-states, not states-and-individuals.
"snip"
The problem NTY's defenders
If you read the piece that began this thread you'll understand I'm not defending them at all... in fact, you'll realize I think the Times is part of a much larger problem.
Is it possible at all to discuss the speculation brought up in the original post, or shall we always degrade into partisan bickering that can do little else but blame "the other side"?
Originally posted by thermopolis
On your original subject.......YES it is mind control for the "sheep"............
Originally posted by zenlover28
4. Why would this bother the rest of the world so much when they have knowledge of this program (probably use it for the same reasons) and it is in no way a threat to them unless they are connected to a terrorist org?
Tons of potential here for it to be something other than just a further attempt at brainwashing American citizens in the typical partisan way.
54(b) FINTRAC may only collect information from public sources that it considers relevant to money laundering or terrorist financing.
54(b) and 66(2) To access law enforcement databases, FINTRAC must enter into agreements that state the nature of and limits with respect to the information that FINTRAC may collect from those databases.
54(d) and (e) Reports and information received or collected must be destroyed within a specified period.
Remember a place called tripoli? Barbary pirates, Teddy sent in the marines.......
This isn't a left/right issue or even a mythical "people right to know" issue. It is national security..........
Originally posted by Duzey
[The difference is it is no longer SWIFT monitoring the activities and notifying the proper authorities. It is the US demanding all of SWIFT's data handed over so they can sift thorugh it themselves. This infringes on my privacy as I am not an American citizen and the Patriot Act should not apply to me. And no, I'm not a terrorist.