Spoilers Follow
The ultimate clash between Marvel and DC, which is often touted as canon but which was not intended as such, is the
Amalgam series of comics. The essential gist of Amalgam was that the DC and Marvel universes
began to bleed into one another, as a result of two all-powerful brothers (who were, in fact, incarnations of their respective universes) becoming
aware of one another after untold eons.
Amalgam featured much-hyped fights between characters which were viewed as similar. So, you had Superman versus the Hulk, Thor versus Captain Marvel,
Wonder Woman versus Storm, Batman versus Captain America, etc. As Rasobasi420 stated, the winners of the various bouts were decided by popular vote.
This tactic has been the cause of much contention and fiercely heated debate over the years, as it was generally believed that characters which should
not have won their battles prevailed solely due to their popularity with fans. The example which is always raised is that of
Wolverine defeating
Lobo.
From what I could tell, Marvel actually won the battle, although there were a number of fights which were implied but never shown. However, accepted
winners include:
Superman beat the Hulk
Thor beat Captain Marvel
Storm beat Wonder Woman
Silver Surfer beat Green Lantern
Spiderman beat Superboy
Batman beat Captain America (but just barely)
Elektra beat Catwoman
Wolverine beat Lobo
In the end, the two brothers began to duke it out themselves, despite the efforts of the two primary cosmic entities of DC
(
The Spectre) and Marvel (
The Living
Tribunal) to prevent such a battle. In a sickly sweet moment, the two brothers decide to shake hands and congratulate each other on having done
so well with their respective universes after witnessing what they considered to be the finest examples of each other's work in Batman and Captain
America respectively.
When it comes to an actual duel between Marvel and DC characters, without the bias of fanboy voting stakes, the situation becomes complicated. Which
characters do we include when we talk about a given universe's stable? Do we, for example, include characters such as
The Endless or
Lucifer from DCs
Vertigo line? Because if we do, these characters represent just about the most powerful
characters in comicdom and would be more than a match for any Marvel character, including Thanos with the Infinity Gauntlet.
The problem with DCs treatment of their characters is that, although they are generally more powerful in terms of raw power than their Marvel
counterparts), they rarely work effectively as a team. The fact that the JLA has a line-up including Superman (
Superman for crying out
loud!!!), Martian Manhunter and Wonder Woman and still manages to lose engagement after engagement says something about the effectiveness of working
together as a team, rather than as a collection of powerful individuals. Marvel always emphasised teamwork (The X-Men, Avengers, Fantastic Four) over
individualism and, as a result, Marvel characters work far better together than their DC counterparts. One-on-one, many Marvel characters don't stand
a chance against their DC equivalents. Superman is stronger than the Hulk and Flash is faster than Quicksilver, for example. Yet, in a team-based
arrangement, such as the JLA versus the Avengers, I'd give the nod to Marvel due to their ability to function together as a cohesive whole much more
effectively.
Another interesting point to note is that DC's characters are often more powerful due to the fact that DC has always been more willing to apply
outright supernatural aspects to their characters, whereas Marvel tend to give their charcters some sense of scientific rationalism. A good example of
this is the DC and Marvel versions of Death. In Marvel, Death is a cosmic entity who doesn't really cause deaths and who seems to be more of a
powerful cosmic entity who controls an aspect of death, rather than the personification of the concept itself. As a result, there are Marvel
characters more powerful than Death - Eternity and the Living Tribunal, for example. In DC, Death (one of the Endless) isn't the god of death or the
spirit of death, but the thing itself, personified. Whereas Marvel's Death can be harmed or limited, DC's Death comes across as a primal aspect of
Creation itself, rather than simply a powerful cosmic entity who happens to have death as their "sphere of influence". Having read widely from the
stables of both publishers for over 20 years, I cannot really think of any character who can match DC's Death or Lucifer in terms of sheer power. And
again, this is due to DC's willingness to portray their characters as outright supernatural or abstract concepts, rather than powerful cosmic beings
with funky powers.
In the end, though, no manner of reason or rationalism will prevail in the face of rabid fanboy adulation for their favourites. Can Batman be beaten
by Captain America? Of course, given the right circumstances. But try getting a Batman fan (of which I am one of the biggest) to admit this. In the
end, we are all fortunate enough not to have to choose sides. Both publishers produce some awesome (as well as some dreadful) comics. I love these
Marvel-versus-DC debates (as long as they are debates and not simply "Hulk would beat Superman coz he rox!!!"), but too much debating and they might
try and pull another Amalgam on us. And if you think that's a good thing, you must never have been subjected to the horrors of
Dark Claw, who was nowhere near as cool as the seperate characters which created him.