It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Over FIFTY earthquakes in the last several hours in Alaska and still counting

page: 3
0
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 14 2006 @ 02:47 AM
link   
I find it interesting that there is activity north and south of the pacific north west, but there is very little activity around the Juan De Fuca subduction zone.

If a big one is going to hit, I have to predict the area off of Vancouver Island or as far south as Oregon could have a megathrust event in the next few days.

But maybe I should take this over to the BTS Dreams & Personal Predictions Forum because I'm no expert....



posted on Jun, 14 2006 @ 02:48 AM
link   
and then to emagine that they only register from 2.5 magnitude. This place is shaking not normal.



posted on Jun, 14 2006 @ 02:51 AM
link   
yea there is no way this is even close to being normal, its about 4am here ganna be tired tomorrow only another hour before the news comes on thoe, hopefully they will have some more info.



posted on Jun, 14 2006 @ 02:54 AM
link   
Isn't there someone on ATS who can say anything about this? Do we have some experts here or is it just normal?



posted on Jun, 14 2006 @ 02:55 AM
link   
I don't think anything out of the norm is gonna happen



posted on Jun, 14 2006 @ 02:55 AM
link   
I would say if this states itself to be true earthquakes ranging from 2.0 to 6.0 on the richter scale and in the number of twenty or more in a localised area could potentially cause a ripple effect around the complete whole of that landmass
almost like water lapping against a sand cliff.
i have felt and pre-empted an earthquake knowing that it happened but not registering an effect more than what a heavy truck would going down the street



posted on Jun, 14 2006 @ 02:56 AM
link   
alass, the rest of the world is asleep and were the only ones awake to see the world end



posted on Jun, 14 2006 @ 02:58 AM
link   
could the 700 tonne 'conventional bomb test' be creating a reaction elsewhere?
that is now certainly entering in to the head of mine considering "every action has an opposite and equal reaction"


d1k

posted on Jun, 14 2006 @ 02:58 AM
link   
We're now at 25 with the last two being a 4.4 and a 4.5.

Can you imagine how scared the people on those islands must be getting shaken all by 25 quakes over 6 hours knowing about last Decembers Tsunami.

[edit on 14-6-2006 by d1k]



posted on Jun, 14 2006 @ 02:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by the_sentinal
alass, the rest of the world is asleep and were the only ones awake to see the world end


Well, I just started (The Netherlands) to work here lol, but I really can't now!



posted on Jun, 14 2006 @ 02:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by the_sentinal
alass, the rest of the world is asleep and were the only ones awake to see the world end


Well, I just started (The Netherlands) to work here lol, but I really can't now!



posted on Jun, 14 2006 @ 03:02 AM
link   
Magnitude 5.2 - OFF THE WEST COAST OF NORTHERN SUMATRA

I guess all the shaking up there is causeing some shaking down there too.



posted on Jun, 14 2006 @ 03:04 AM
link   
yea where is Sumatra? btw Im just kinda waiting to see a 9.0 reading now, I know its very unlikly but still starting to get nervous, no earthquakes in New England in a while lol not on a fault line but still



posted on Jun, 14 2006 @ 03:07 AM
link   
sumatra is way down to the south west of alaska, speaking globaly.
I am pretty sure that the huge ass plate is connected to the other huge
ass plate. As you can see i know alot about techtonics...lol



posted on Jun, 14 2006 @ 03:07 AM
link   
www.geophys.washington.edu...
Washington have had several earthquakes in the last 2 days
california in the last 2 weeks has had 8 or more



posted on Jun, 14 2006 @ 03:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by rai76
Isn't there someone on ATS who can say anything about this? Do we have some experts here or is it just normal?


As I have said on page two;

Originally posted by ADVISOR
The closest to experts you are going to get here on ATS, (if that is what you call them
), can be found with the Caldera thread.



posted on Jun, 14 2006 @ 03:11 AM
link   
Maybe a stupid question but could it be something to do with a Volcano in that area? Does someone know if there is one there?



posted on Jun, 14 2006 @ 03:11 AM
link   
The kind of activity you are seeing out in the Aleutian islands is not all that unusual. I was staitioned out there back in the 60's and it seems like we had small quakes aperiodically, but frequently--All those islands are volcanic. It's kind of like the earth is readjusting itself after that huge quake last year.



posted on Jun, 14 2006 @ 03:13 AM
link   


no earthquakes in New England in a while lol not on a fault line but still



Actually there are several fault lines that run thru new england. One particular large one that runs from Maine to New York. It is very stable and I dont recall any instability from it since 1990 when we had a small tremor.



posted on Jun, 14 2006 @ 03:14 AM
link   
yes 60 km (35 miles) SW of Kiska Volcano, Alaska that is the closest one to the action



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join