It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Springer
Thought I'd pass this on...
www.realityuncovered.com...
Springer...
Originally posted by robertfenix
Greatwaller as well, anybody want to guess who this semi famous person is.....
greatwaller
Re: Main Serpo Discussion
« Reply #1978 on May 4, 2006, 7:42pm »
Since my recent retirement from my active work as a prof. photographer
Originally posted by robertfenix
greatwaller is "woodpecker".
William Moore, co-author of the first book on the Roswell case, titled THE ROSWELL INCIDENT, which he wrote with Charles Berlitz. It was Moore's associate, Jaime H. Shandera
Check out what his job was….
greatwaller
Re: Main Serpo Discussion
« Reply #1978 on May 4, 2006, 7:42pm »
Since my recent retirement from my active work as a prof. photographer
OK, so to make 100% CERTAIN that it's the "old" ANONYMOUS, let me ask
you two (2) "trivia" questions whch you should be able to answer
easily:
1) When was your LAST posting sent to me which comprised the journal
entries for POSTING #11?
2) Pull out a trivia question from your OLD lycos.com account and then
answer your own question and send it to me at your NEW yahoo.com
account,... how's that for MY being careful?
Originally posted by jumpspace
Sandman658:
I read some more (just to comply with your suggestion) and I came across this:
>In this email, Victor describes to how it all went down with respect the change between Doty # 1 and Doty # 2
Victor is explaining how Serpo was taken over and he IS NOT saying that he had anything to do with it...
Though it is IMPLIED by RU that he did.
This type of "spin" was on most info I read.
As far as I'm concerned, until the people involved with RU explain my two initial questions, it's just another dis-info site - another layer of dis-info to lay on the other few layers of dis-info.
The info I have read on RU has so much spin on it that you could put it up for the $250 000 reward someone is offering to create a "perpetual motion" machine.
Cheers
JS
Re: Serpo.info
« Reply #19 on May 10, 2006, 4:24am »
Well TM updated Serpo.info with anon's original email. Who is Sylvester McCoglin? Anyone know anything?
Originally posted by jumpspace
rdude02:
I don't know if BR and serpo.info are one and the same, however I do believe BR was "employed" as a dis-info agent to be also "shot down in flames"...later on.
Cheers
JS
[edit on 24-6-2006 by jumpspace]
Now - can you tell us why you believe BR was "employed" as a dis-info agent to be also "shot down in flames"...later on? Do you have any evidence of this?
Originally posted by jumpspace
Hi Shawnna,
From what I recall, Victor was "sacked" by the original anonymous and the reins were handed to BR.
I do not believe Victor was sacked by the "original anonymous" though.
I believe that the original anonymous was "taken out of the picture", the "infiltrator anonymous" put in place (in cahoots with BR and whoever) and then Victor was sacked by the "infilatrator anonymous".
I believe BR was put in place to continue to "distribute info" but, over time, it would become "murky" (holes would develop, uncredible info would be provided etc) and BR would eventually be discredited.
The evidence I have? Well, it was very obvious that when BR took over, the info that was coming from him was from a completely different source altogether...and the reason being is that either the "original anonymous" was dead, in hiding or locked up in a mental asylum in "custody".
If serpo was really true, do you think the PTB would let it out?
Definitely not. It was cause MAJOR distrust in most (if not all) governments and who knows what would result.
On another note, do you know where that list AND information about that crew MIA went to? That was something else that definitely gave the original serpo story good credo (before BR got involved).
Sorry if I called it "spin" on the RU website but when I read the emails I saw two very clear meanings and both meanings weren't laid out - only one...thus the reason for mentioning "spin" - as that is how it's normally done.