It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Egyptian-American El Sayyid Nosair assassinates controversial right-wing Zionist leader Rabbi Meir Kahane. Kahane’s organization, the Jewish Defense League, was linked to dozens of bombings and is ranked by the FBI as the most lethal domestic militant group in the US at the time.
An FBI explosives expert later states that, “If they had found the exact architectural Achilles’ heel or if the bomb had been a little bit bigger, not much more, 500 pounds more, I think it would have brought her down.”
Several of the bombers were trained by the CIA to fight in the Afghan war, and the CIA later concludes, in internal documents, that it was “partly culpable” for this bombing.
One of the attackers even leaves a message which will later be found by investigators, stating, “Next time, it will be very precise.”
Philippine and US investigators learn that Ramzi Yousef, Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, and their fellow plotters were actually planning three different attacks when they were foiled in early January. In addition to the planned assassination of the Pope, and the first phase of Operation Bojinka previously discovered, they also planned to crash about a dozen passenger planes into prominent US buildings. It is often mistakenly believed that there is one Bojinka plan to blow up some planes and crash others into buildings, but in fact these different forms of attack are to take place in two separate phases.
Murad reveals a plan to hijack commercial airliners at some point after the effect of Bojinka dies down. Murad himself had been training in the US for this plot. He names the buildings that would be targeted for attack: CIA headquarters, the Pentagon, an unidentified nuclear power plant, the Transamerica Tower in San Francisco, the Sears Tower, and the World Trade Center.
In the wake of uncovering the Operation Bojinka plot, Philippine authorities find a letter on a computer disc written by the plotters of the failed 1993 WTC bombing. This letter apparently was never sent, but its contents will be revealed in 1998 congressional testimony. [US Congress, 2/24/1998] The Manila police chief also reports discovering a statement from bin Laden around this time that, although they failed to blow up the WTC in 1993, “on the second attempt they would be successful.”
MI6, the British intelligence agency, gives a secret report to liaison staff at the US embassy in London. The reports states that al-Qaeda has plans to use “commercial aircraft” in “unconventional ways,” “possibly as flying bombs.”
US intelligence learns of plans by an al-Qaeda member who is also a US citizen to fly a hang glider into the Egyptian Presidential Palace and then detonate the explosives he is carrying. The individual, who received hang glider training in the US, brings a hang glider back to Afghanistan, but various problems arise during the testing of the glider. This unnamed person is subsequently arrested and is in custody abroad.
In a conversation recorded by US government agents as part of a sting operation, a Pakistani ISI agent named Rajaa Gulum Abbas points to the WTC and says, “Those towers are coming down.” He later makes two other references to an attack on the WTC
In the wake of the arrest of Ahmed Ressam (see December 14, 1999), FBI investigators work frantically to uncover more millennium plots before they are likely to take place at the end of the year. Documents found with Ressam lead to co-conspirators in New York, then Boston and Seattle. Enough people are arrested to prevent any attacks. Counterterrorism “tsar” Richard Clarke later says, “I think a lot of the FBI leadership for the first time realized that ... there probably were al-Qaeda people in the United States. They realized that only after they looked at the results of the investigation of the millennium bombing plot.” [PBS Frontline, 10/3/2002] Yet Clinton’s National Security Adviser Sandy Berger later claims that the FBI will still repeatedly assure the Clinton White House until Clinton leaves office that al-Qaeda lacks the ability to launch a domestic strike
Niaz Khan, a British citizen originally from Pakistan, is recruited into an al-Qaeda plot. In early 2000 he is flown to Lahore, Pakistan, and then trains in a compound there for a week with others on how to hijack passenger airplanes. He trains on a mock cockpit of a 767 aircraft (an airplane type used on 9/11). He is taught hijacking techniques, including how to smuggle guns and other weapons through airport security and how to get into a cockpit. In April 2000 he flies to the US and told to meet with a contact. He says, “They said I would live there for a while and meet some other people and we would hijack a plane from JFK and fly it into a building.” [London Times, 5/9/2004] He has “no doubt” this is the 9/11 plot. However, Khan slips away and gambles away the money given to him by al-Qaeda. Afraid he would be killed for betraying al-Qaeda, he turns himself in to the FBI. For three weeks, FBI counterterrorism agents in Newark, New Jersey interview him. [MSNBC, 6/3/2004; Observer, 6/6/2004] One FBI agent recalls, “We were incredulous. Flying a plane into a building sounded crazy but we polygraphed him and he passed.”
9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey will mention in a public hearing, “In March 2001, another CSG [Counterterrorism Security Group] item on the agenda mentions the possibility of alleged bin Laden interests in ‘targeting US passenger planes at the Chicago airport,’ end of quote.” [9/11 Commission, 3/24/2004] No newspaper has ever mentioned this warning, which presumably remained classified aside from this one accidental mention by Kerrey.
An intelligence source claims that a group of al-Qaeda operatives is planning to conduct an unspecified attack inside the US in April. One of the operatives allegedly resides in the US. There are also reports of planned attacks in California and New York State for the same month, though whether this is reference to the same plot is unclear.
Originally posted by TheTruthIsOutThere2012
hes basically saying that most attacks on the U.S. are setup...such as 9./11...
Tapes Depict Proposal to Thwart Bomb Used in Trade Center Blast; Plan to Foil Bomb Used at Trade Center
By RALPH BLUMENTHAL. New York Times (1857-Current file). New York, N.Y.: Oct 28, 1993. pg. A1, 2 pgs
Law-enforcement officials were told that terrorists were building a bomb that was eventually used to blow up the World Trade Center, and they planned to thwart the plotters by secretly substituting harmless powder for the explosives, an informer said after the blast. - NY Times Archive
[rest...]
The informer was to have helped the plotters build the bomb and supply the fake powder, but the plan was called off by an F.B.I. supervisor who had other ideas about how the informer, Emad Salem, should be used, the informer said.
newsmine.org...
You have voted ThatsJustWeird for the Way Above Top Secret award. You have one more vote left for this month.
[by Wayne Madsen Report - November 18, 2005]
Shortly before his untimely death, former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook told the House of Commons that "Al Qaeda" is not really a terrorist group but a database of international mujaheddin and arms smugglers used by the CIA and Saudis to funnel guerrillas, arms, and money into Soviet-occupied Afghanistan. Courtesy of World Affairs, a journal based in New Delhi, WMR can bring you an important excerpt from an Apr.-Jun. 2004 article by Pierre-Henry Bunel, a former agent for French military intelligence.
[...]
"The truth is, there is no Islamic army or terrorist group called Al Qaida. And any informed intelligence officer knows this. But there is a propaganda campaign to make the public believe in the presence of an identified entity representing the 'devil' only in order to drive the 'TV watcher' to accept a unified international leadership for a war against terrorism. The country behind this propaganda is the US and the lobbyists for the US war on terrorism are only interested in making money."
Originally posted by Griff
Just because the government knew these attacks would happen by al-Qaeda doesn't leave out their possible involvement. Funny how we knew this was comming but we still couldn't stop it? We've known since 1995...that's 6 years that we didn't put new transponders on planes....that's 6 years that we couldn't come up with a plan for Norad to foil this plot.....that's 6 years etc., etc.
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
*sigh*
Quick question.
What's the purpose of allowing some terrorist attacks and thwarting others? Bojinka would have killed more people than 9/11 and affected more countries. So why would the government allow 9/11 and not Bojinka?
"Bill lives in a large building, so his apartment must be large."
And BS, all that has been talked about in several of these threads. Please review.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Governmental factions weren't behind Bojinka, which, I suppose, you take as proof that they were therefore not behind 9/11? That's called a non-sequitur, a logical fallacy.
This whole thread is an example of such logic.
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
So tell us BS. Which terrorists attacks/plots were really government attacks/plots and which weren't. And please tell us how you came to that conclusion.
If terrorists were planning to carry out Bojinka, why do you believe they wouldn't want to carry out 9/11 which was part of Bojinka?
Yes they do and I really don't feel like going through them now so....
Gov site so....
(it's no worse than those sites you get your stuff from)
usinfo.state.gov...
[...]
The United States wanted to be able to deny that the CIA was funding the Afghan war, so its support was funneled through Pakistan's Inter Services Intelligence agency (ISI).
Originally posted by TheTruthIsOutThere2012
hes basically saying that most attacks on the U.S. are setup...such as 9./11...
Originally posted by bsbray11
First, explain to me why non-sequitur is considered fallacious logic.
And then explain to me how the logic you're using is any different.
Please offer something conclusive to show that 9/11 was just a "part of Bojinka".
Yes they do and I really don't feel like going through them now so....
You pretty much just posted all of the same stuff I did, but emphasized different points and came to a different conclusion.
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
What are you talking about? What logic am I using?
All I did was post a timeline of terrorist activities and showed what they were planning before and up to 9/11. All I'm asking you to do is show that these terrorists weren't doing all that and it was really the government, as you all have claimed.
It may not have been called Bojinka but the same players were involved.
How is all of what you posted and all of what I posted proof of the govs. involvement in 9/11?
Originally posted by bsbray11
When have I claimed that all terrorism is actually the government's work? Can you stop putting words in my mouth?
What you're getting at is that 9/11 was an Islamic terrorist attack because Islamic terrorist attacks occur. Right?
Prove it. Bring out the source documentation and show all of the supporting evidence for all of this. Show us what institutions are telling us what did or did not happen.
Read the links and the links in the links.
It wasn't intended to be proof of government involvement. It was proof of government involvement with the ISI, which is known to work with Islamic terrorists. And when I say work, I mean close ties and lots of $$$.
But this thread is about the 9/11 attacks.
The CIA works with alot of people who work with people who work with people who aren't very "good." The ISI is the CIA of Pakistan, why would you think that the CIA doesn't work with the ISI?
And again, are you suggesting that the CIA controls the ISI? If not, what's your point?
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
What I did is show you how the terrorists were working on and planning 9/11 since the early 90s.
I'm simply asking you since you believe the government was behind the 9/11 attacks to prove the terrorists were not planning 9/11.
Please show me that it was the government and not terrorists that carried out the 9/11 attacks as I have shown. Everything that I wrote. Prove it wrong.
Why did you cut off my quote, I'll quote it again so you can't miss it.
Read the links and the links in the links.
Originally posted by TheTruthIsOutThere2012
hes basically saying that most attacks on the U.S. are setup...such as 9./11...
Originally posted by bsbray11
I fail to see where you've conclusively shown this.
If you've already proven that the terrorists were planning 9/11, then why would you ask me to disprove the notion? Not that asking a negative is generally accepted argument anyway.
Let's see if you can prove there was a connection. If you can't, I won't have to disprove you. That's usually how it works anyway man.
What exactly am I proving wrong? That there have been terrorist plots in the past to hijack planes? I've known this. You still haven't connected any of this to 9/11. It's your thread. Back it up.
Dude, why don't you just post it if you know what you're talking about? It's not that hard. I'm asking for your evidence. I'm not going to go do your freaking research for you.
If you already have something some meat on it, that you can support, then what are you waiting for?