It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kipman725
The shale in colorado is no secret. Unless some fantastic new methord of extraction has been developed though more energy has to be used to extract the oil than can be obtained from the oil via combustion.
more info on oil shale:
en.wikipedia.org...
there's no coverup here, lots of attempts at getting energy from oil shale mentioned.
Originally posted by TheGoodDoctorFunk
Stellar, do you have any info bucking up your $20/Barrel claim?
The heavy syrup is either drawn out with heat or mined with machinery and then heated to transform it into usable oil. The production cost per barrel, $10 to $20, makes it competitive with conventional oil in the United States.
The oil sands didn't yield their treasure overnight. Suncor Energy of Calgary, the first company to begin such operations, in 1967, embarked on a major expansion in 1998, when the worldwide price of oil had plummeted to around $10 per barrel and the cost of producing from oil sands was still well over $20 per barrel. "It did take a lot of nerve," Chief Executive Officer Rick George recalls. The company continues to absorb risks. Early last year, a major fire cut Suncor's daily output for 2005 by 22 percent. Even so--in a measure of just how profitable this business is--Suncor saw a 14 percent increase in net income.
www.usnews.com...
If the technology has been available since the 60's, yet hidden by the government, somebody would have figured it out anyway.
That much oil, at that low of a cost, there is no reason why the Government would hide the fact so they could build up their military.
If the oil could be extracted that cheaply, we would see many of the familiar faces at the top of the .military-industrial complex instead leading these trillion-dollar oil companies. S'all
Perhaps theres some plan is to use up all the oil in the Middle East then when thats all gone and those countries have little more then sand, then make use of the North American oil shale.
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
Perhaps theres some plan is to use up all the oil in the Middle East then when thats all gone and those countries have little more then sand, then make use of the North American oil shale.
Between the US and Canada there is a insane amount of oil reserves in North America.
Originally posted by Skibum
My thoughts exactly, burn up outside resources first then when they are gone, you have rising superpowers like China over a barrel.
Originally posted by niteboy82
Wouldn't that be a turn of the tide. I wonder what the faces would be like if other countries ran out of oil eventually, and they all started bombing the US because we have a "tyrant" running the country? The plus would be that they're doing it for a spiritual cause, and they could put us under a "food for oil" sanction. Of course, this is all very unlikely, maybe even extremely unlikely, but it is an interesting thought.
So does this mean that every ATSer should start buying up land in colorado mountains so that we can pull oil rights?
Originally posted by timbradwell
like a coal strip mine?
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
Perhaps theres some plan is to use up all the oil in the Middle East then when thats all gone and those countries have little more then sand, then make use of the North American oil shale.
Between the US and Canada there is a insane amount of oil reserves in North America.
Originally posted by RedGolem
That link was a little deceptive. There is nothing new about the oil shell in the rocky mtns. The artical did go on to talk about a new servay, and test drilling being done. There has been test studies going on and off for about 40 years, so unless some one has found an efishent way to extract the oil all of this is going to mean a bunch of nothing.