posted on May, 20 2006 @ 02:47 PM
I am quoting this from a thread in march in which it was started that the next possible 9/11 would be 9/9/2006.
I am a new subscriber to this website. Through www.nineeleven.co.uk, I recently came across this link:
www.weehoursradio.com...
Listen to "Texas City Nuke card.wav" and "Ghost troop mission 666.mp3"
These two audio files are really need to be listened to. Eric May actually thinks that it could well be Houston or Texas city and it could be nuclear
using a bunker-buster bomb.
There was apparently meant to be a terror exercise drill at the beginning of May in Chicago involving homeland security and national guard people with
a dirty bomb and a tower collapse (I think in order to justify the invasion of Iran).
Because it fell through, they suggest an alternative is Houston because of the links with oil and the Bush family.
The British Petroleum fire in Texas (anyone remember?) was not an accident as we know it.
The nominee for the CIA, General Hayden (sp ?), needs to be confirmed as director before Congress goes on their break (6/6/06) and May suggests this
will be a closed vote for Congress will decide whether to be involved in a nuclear attack on US citizens.
Also, this is a 2hour long documentary and is worth watching:
www.911busters.com...
Webster Tarpley now suggests there were 15+ terror exercise drills on 9/11 across most of the US, including a thermonuclear stand-off.
I think we have to move beyond the evidence regarding 9/11 and the US people and media have to start observing future so-called "terror exercise
drills" because it could turn into the real thing. It gives them a cover story.
my 2 cents / pence worth of contribution.