It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ceci2006
And "man up" you say? All I can say to you is that you sorely need to be in a situation in which you are the only White person in a place filled with another race before you can say such things. And when the other race talks about you in a derogatory fashion, you'd be screaming wildly about how your rights are being violated. And how you're not being heard. And of course, they would probably peg you as a "nut with issues".
But no matter. You'd never be brave enough to put yourself in such a situation.
Originally quoted by Escromutus
I feel sorry for you because its obvious that you carry around alot of resentment towards white folks for some reason. My rights were violated several times when i couldnt get hired because i was a white male so im quite aware of how it feels. I bucked up, swallowed the pill and moved on and got a better job somewhere else. I do not hold women and minorities responsible for the fact that i didnt get hired because that would be lunacy.
Originally quoted by jsobecky
This is both puzzling and ironic. It implies that it is OK for someone from inside the group to use that term. As if it should be less offensive. And it also implies that all inside members are completely educated as to the origins of the term and the nuance associated with it.
He probably assumed that he was conversing with educated people who understood the origins of the term, and that it was not necessary to explain away the term.
He quickly realized that he needs to learn to walk on eggshells because there are those who disregard the message in their pursuit of verbal injury.
My guess is that she [Dr. Rice] didn't take offense. She is an educated, literate, articulate woman. After the chuckle, she probably said something like "Welcome to the White House".
It Didn't Take Tony Snow Long To Run Afoul of Some in the Media
In declining to discuss the NSA's alleged collection of domestic phone records, Snow had said he wouldn't "hug the tar baby" of commenting on a program the White House won't confirm or deny. Brazile wanted it known that several people called her to complain about that reference to an American folk story about a trap that's impossible to get out of — which has also been used as a racial slur. Ryan has obligingly filed a story about it.
Tony Snow gets personal in first on-camera session
The expression, which refers to a character in the most famous of the fictional Uncle Remus stories, is sometimes used to portray an inextricable situation. But, as the word also has been used as a derogatory term for blacks, it raised eyebrows when spoken from the White House podium.
Later in the briefing, Snow was asked what he meant. "Well, I believe 'hug the tarbaby,' we could trace that back to American lore," he said.
TONY SNOW ‘HUGS TAR BABY’ IN FIRST WHITE HOUSE BRIEFING
Also during the briefing, Snow summarily dismissed questions about racial overtones in the nation’s immigration debate.
"I think I will not try to improve on the president's words from today," was the only answer given to CNN's Suzanne Malveaux’s question. When Ryan inquired about racial tensions caused by the proposed guest-worker program, Snow wondered "how on earth" that could be the case.
Tony Snow takes his lumps and hugs the baby
In what has to be the height of irony, after the briefing President Bush greeted the 2006 WNBA championship team the Sacramento Monarchs to the Rose Garden. All of the women are tall, strong and quite tough.
I didn't see Tony Snow in any shots of Bush with the team. I will leave up it to you, wise reader, to connect the dots on this one.
Washington Post
Silver Spring, Md.: Why has the Post not written an editorial, lambasting Tony Snow for offending people of color by using the word "tar baby" in answering a question during his first press conference. Why did The Post not report this in the story that it did on the event? Tar Baby is a derogatory term and Snow should be fired for using it and then trying to defend it with a lame explanation. Toni Morrison defines tar baby this way: "Tar Baby is also a name, like "n---," that white people call black children, black girls ." How can a person like this be a spokesman for the White House, when he obviously has no sensitivity to people of color--a necessary trait at any given time, but especially so considering race relations in this country, and the current negotiations regarding immigration issues. Why has The Post expressed outrage over this insult?
Howard Kurtz: Dana Milbank reported Snow's use of the "tar baby" phrase. I have no idea why the Post editorial page decides to write or not write on a particular issue, but perhaps the folks there were giving Snow the benefit of the doubt in not using the phrase as a racial insult.
The Two Faces of Tony Snow
He got away almost scot-free using a term -- "tar baby" -- that many consider racist.
Erasing Race: The Ward Connerly Approach
...I continue to doubt the power of language to correct deeply held misconceptions and the harmful behavior that often results from them.
For instance, if Rodney King had informed his pursuers that he was not black but simply American, would they have spared him his notorious beating? If Amadou Diallo's assailants had believed him to be not a black man but simply a New Yorker, would his wallet have remained just a wallet? And if changing or removing racial labels truly influences behavior, why do White Citizens' Councils by any other name smell just as foul?
Originally posted by ceci2006
Gabe Caggiano hints at how Mr. Snow might have been "snubbed" by
the White House when the WNBA Champions Sacramento Monarchs
came by for a visit
Originally posted by ceci2006
Tony Snow has gotten his hands slapped. He was ostrasized
for a few days by the Bush administration. But he'll be forgiven
and back in the swing of things.
Precisely. This is a NON-ISSUE
Originally posted by FlyersFan
When REAL racism rears it's ugly head, it needs to be exposed and
taken care of. When nothing is wrong and it's pointed at as racism,
then that takes away from the real problem of racism when it does
show up. Crying wolf constantly doesn't help the 'cause'.
Originally posted by ceci2006
His comment even produced gasps in the crowd. Believe me, Southern apologists can say all they like about Joel Chandler Harris. But, in my consciousness, I have never heard of the term being used in a positive way. Especially when kids at my elementary school shouted it at me, among other things.
Originally posted by Escrotumus
There was probably a single muffled gasp from a lone liberal
reporter who wanted to stir up trouble.
Until his firing on July 28, former "Fox-7" reporter Caggiano was very
likely the most hated man in Austin television journalism. A few phone calls here
and there can certainly make one believe so -- very quickly, one finds colleagues
who complain that he is rude, unprofessional, sexist, belligerent, hot-tempered,
and more than a little scary. Channel 7 reporters, former co-workers, journalists
from rival stations, even Austin correspondents from non-competing stations in
other cities -- all nearly fell over themselves in rushing to complain about
Caggiano. And all, except one, asked to remain confidential, often citing a fear of
physical violence from Caggiano
Originally posted by ceci2006
I just feel that people have to have common sense.
To go after America's liability we had to locate real transformative power outside ourselves. Worse, we had to see our fate as contingent on America's paying off that liability. We have been a contingent people ever since, arguing our weakness and white racism in order to ignite the engine of white liability. And this has mired us in a protest-group identity that mistrusts individualism because free individuals might jeopardize the group's effort to activate this liability.