It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ceci2006
Peaceful people have their place because they think of all the moral implications in the world. They are the ones who care for the sick and wounded; they think of the laws and the ethics behind them; and they are champions for those who cannot fend for themselves. They think about the hungry. They resist any type of battle. They sacrifice themselves for the cause of not confronting another human being for the sake of serenity. Yet, they are most brutalized, looked down upon and scourged humans on earth because of their unwillingness to take the easy path to war. And as a result, they show their bravery in the face of aggression because they are willing to take a stand opposed to the most bloodiest conflict.
....................
Originally posted by ceci2006
If this is so, semperfortis, how do you explain the My Lai Massacre or the 15 Iraqi civilians killed by the Marines? How do you explain the soldiers who had looted the treasures out of the Iraqi museums? What about the treatment in Abu Ghraib and Gitmo? Do you think that these were the acts of "brave men and women"? Should we support these soldiers as patriots too? Or should we view them as malcontents as well?
Or should we turn a blind eye to acts of aggression especially committed in times of battle? Should we look for the higher cause in a war when we know that civilians on foreign soil are being harmed for no good reason?
All I can say is that these comments reflect the two types of people in the world. And depending where you fall, how will you view the actions committed above?
Peaceful people have their place because they think of all the moral implications in the world. They are the ones who care for the sick and wounded; they think of the laws and the ethics behind them; and they are champions for those who cannot fend for themselves. They think about the hungry. They resist any type of battle. They sacrifice themselves for the cause of not confronting another human being for the sake of serenity. Yet, they are most brutalized, looked down upon and scourged humans on earth because of their unwillingness to take the easy path to war. And as a result, they show their bravery in the face of aggression because they are willing to take a stand opposed to the most bloodiest conflict.
War-like people are the ones that act on their aggression as a result of a cause; they are the ones who singularly think that their killing serves a higher purpose without any thought. They employ their special talents of battle on those who are singled out to be the enemy. And of course, they believe that they are sacrificing themselves for the highest significance.
The strange thing is both think that they are patriots. But when the soul of each type of person is weighed, which one will tip to the side in the wrong direction?
[edit on 24-5-2006 by ceci2006]
Originally posted by Muaddib
Anyways, I apologize for going off topic, but i hate it when people exagerate and lie.
Originally posted by Rasobasi420
If you're refering to me, I'm not aware of any point when I exagerated or lied. If you could point it out, I'd much appreciate it.
these are just people who have lost all of their freedoms and are now fighting back.
Originally posted by Muaddib
Insurgents and terrorists are not just "people who have lost all their freedoms.... Many of the insurgents have killed Iraqis, they put roadside bombs which kills citizens, and Iraqi citizens have fought against them...so yeah, you exagerated or knowingly lied.
Originally posted by ceci2006
Thinking about your comments again, semperfortis, I must say that I too honor and respect the troops.
But I respectfully disagree with your interpretation of what I said. When I said that world was divided by "war-like" and "peaceful" people, I meant in general.
But however, I have more questions for you.
The questions about the soldiers who have committed wrongs at wartime was a separate question. However, you seem to say that their acts are a part of battle. Should we ignore their acts for the higher cause of war? I mean, both the My Lai Massacre and the 15 civilians killed in Iraq are heinous acts. Are you saying that we have to still honor the endeavors of these soldiers as patriots despite what they do? Their acts of atrocity are the ones that I meant in terms of describing "war-like" people. They fall in the same camp as those who torture others at Abu Ghraib. Don't these acts deserve to be punished?
It is acts like these that make me question the behavior that is conducted by our military in wartime generally. You say that things happen at wartime. But how do these young men and women deal with it? There must be some training involved. Because no one is innately desensitized to graphic bloodshed and killing like that without feeling some sort of emotion.
Because for the soldiers who witness the atrocities of war, they have to come home. And of course, we have to make sure we care for them after engaging in a lengthy, stressful situation as battle. Because if we don't, we have more homeless vets on the street. These are the true patriots. They endured the worst of the war while fighting for our country, yet when they come home they cannot get care because the government cut funding for VA services.
How can we not question our country when it does not employ proper care for the soldiers who are wounded mentally and physically in the war?
I have more thoughts about how to answer what I meant for "peace-like" people, but I am going to do it in a future post.
[edit on 26-5-2006 by ceci2006]
Originally posted by semperfortis
hey Muaddib, maybe he would prefer they lost their freedoms to Saddam when he was gassing them by the hundred of thousands.
What was the VERY conservative estimate again? Over 1 million of his own people exterminated?
Ah but we are the bad guys.
Do these posters have any logic at all?
Common sense appears to have fled this post.
Civilians reported killed by military intervention in Iraq
Min = 37918 Max = 42288