Flight77.info - Pentagon video release imminent?

The current Boeing 757 doors are 6'0 tall and 2'9" wide.

Here are all the door dimensions on the 757.

Passenger doors (two, fwd, port):
Height 1.83 m (6 ft 0 in)
Width 0.84 m (2 ft 9 in)
Passenger door (rear, port): Height 1.83 m (6 ft 0 in)
Width 0.76 m (2 ft 6 in)
Service door (fwd, stbd): Height 1.65 m (5 ft 5 in)
Width 0.76 m (2 ft 6 in)
Service door (stbd, opposite second passenger door):
Height 1.83 m (6 ft 0 in)
Width 0.84 m (2 ft 9 in)
Service door (rear, stbd): Height 1.83 m (6 ft 0 in)
Width 0.76 m (2 ft 6 in)
Emergency exits (four, overwing):
Height 0.97 m (3 ft 2 in)
Width 0.51 m (1 ft 8 in)
Emergency exits, optional (two, aft of wings):
Height 1.32 m (4 ft 4 in)
Width 0.61 m (2 ft 0 in)

www.janes.com...

Thanks for the info Zaphod. My question is: Is the door that AgentSmith was using a service door or a passenger door. The service door is only 5' 5" I think it said. Which would make AgentSmith's assumptions fairly accurate (within a small error...not enough to really do any damage).

well here is your plane



also see where are drawn the line for the ground level where the wall meets the
ground, you can see objects around there smal objects, and you need to rescale u'r plane, poor police oficer he barly fits in the plane

It's the forward port passenger door that he was using in his picture. So it should be 6'0 and 2'9.The service doors are USUALLY on the right side of the plane.

Thanks for the updated dimensions. It's pretty clear that AgentSmith's drawings are completely unrealistic and unscientific.

Thanks Zaphod. I can always count on you for my aircraft questions.

I don't think AgentSmith is trying to decieve anyone though. I think it was just a simple mistake.

p.s. Smith and others....what software do you use to draw lines and cut and paste things into pictures?

Originally posted by Leto
Thanks for the updated dimensions. It's pretty clear that AgentSmith's drawings are completely unrealistic and unscientific.

yes , the 757 would take almost 2 floors of the pentagon in hight, the object that is in the frames does not even mejure 1 floor, it's clear to me now it's not a 757.


[edit on 19-5-2006 by pepsi78]

Not really, it was only a marginal error, going on the assumption of the policeman being 6' the same as the door apparantly is:



Don't forget the windows were apparantly 5' x 7' ? Can anyone verify this but it is stated here:

The first-story at AE Drive is brick infilled in the concrete frame, with no windows. The concrete walls have 5 by 7 ft openings for windows and include columns built in as pilasters, corresponding to column locations below, and girders reinforced within the wall.
www.pubs.asce.org...

And in the NIST report.

They appear to start at head height. Going by a height of 6' for the men that would make from ground to the top of the window about 13'. The 757 is a 12' 4" tube, it would not be two floors by a long shot! My estimations were out my inches, not feet..

[edit on 19-5-2006 by AgentSmith]

Pentagon hit by flying grilled cheese sandwich



The story


How Flight 77 Hitting The Pentagon Would Really Look?

Oh look, so now we've gone back to a 757 from The Land of the Giants, well that was predictable. And the truth seekers say that the disinformation comes from the Government?

God why does everyone insist that is right? Since when does a 1fps camera get an object moving at 500+ mph in so many frames?


Edit to change fpm to fps. D'oh!

[edit on 5/19/2006 by Zaphod58]

Even this image from 911research.com seems to agree with my estimations:



911research.wtc7.net...

So I guess I'm not the only retard

why fly a plane so low to the ground and affect only a small part of it, why didn't they come down from a steeper angle, covering a wider area, than just one side, skimming the ground to get there, don't make sense.

Originally posted by AgentSmith
Even this image from 911research.com seems to agree with my estimations:



911research.wtc7.net...

So I guess I'm not the only retard

How exactly does that image agree with your estimations?

Because when you dive a plane straight down it's actually much harder to hit a target than you realize. With the big open area in the center of the Pentagon they couldn't be sure of hitting something or if they'd miss and hit the center area. Take a flight sim, I recommend MS flight sim, and try diving straight down on something. You really get affected by wind, and a lot of other factors.

Err, maybe because the top of the fuselage is about level with the top of the bottom row of windows? And that's in flight here I imagine, I was just showing the relative small size of the 757 in comparison to the Pentagon, I wasn't even simulating the impact attitude.
What are your credentials exactly may I ask?

EDIT

Sorry, where are my manners, you did ask me first.
My credentials are the small cluster of neurons located within my cranial cavity, I have proof right here:


Actual size

[edit on 19-5-2006 by AgentSmith]

Originally posted by AgentSmith
What are your credentials exactly may I ask?

Me??

Also, on a side note, so what are peoples summary after this footage, plane or something else?

Who knows, it does exactly what it's meant to do - tell us nothing.

Originally posted by Denied
Me??

No that was to Leto, sorry.

Originally posted by AgentSmith

Originally posted by Denied
Me??

No that was to Leto, sorry.

A simple and almost worthless associate's degree. What are your credentials?