It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(www.acl.lu...)
Country..........98 oct..........95 oct........Diese.................$/US gallon
Germany.........1,366€.......1,293€........1,118€................6.35$
Austria............1,116€.......1,069€........1,010€
Belgium...........1,352€........1,338€.......1,087€
Danmark..........1,391€.......1,352€........1,196€
Spain...............1,142€........1,031€.......0,960€
France.............1,273€........1,237€........1,082€
UK....................1,377€........1,291€........1,353€
Italy.................1,258€........1,166€
Luxembourg.....1,160€........1,136€........0,954€
Norvay.............1,450€.........1,374€........1,261€............6,75 $
Netherland.......1,502€.........1,448€.......1,097€.............7,00 $
Switzerland.......1,063€........1,032€.........1,089€............4,95 $
Originally posted by derfyxxx
I can help you ship diesel VW, the are left hand, and here in Belgium where I live we have excellent automobile prices.
Only 1 countrey is allmost completely independent, and that is Brazil, we should felicit them, and it is at their advantage.
Hydrogen, then?
Little chance.
Hydrogen is indeed a cheap, clean energy source. But there's a catch: you can't find it anywhere in nature. You will have to make it first, by splitting up water (H2O) into hydrogen (H2) and oxygen (O2). And that costs you... yes, energy.
Next, you will have to compress your hydrogen into a high-pressure tank, in order to carry it around. Those tanks are heavy, and the compressing costs you even more energy. So in the end, you're better off using common fuel. Hydrogen costs you more energy than it will save you.
So, we'd go back to good old nuclear energy, right?
Score.
Nuclear power plants offer a limitless, steady and very reliable energy source. Ok, the downside is that every now and then, nuclear power plants tend to go kaboom, like they did in Harrisburg and Chernobyl. And then, there's the waste: radioactive mud, not to be touched for several hundreds of years. No one really knows where to put that. But perhaps, we're going to have to take problems like these for granted.
Originally posted by Jaryn
Study: Ethanol Production Consumes Six Units Of Energy To Produce Just One
I found this article with a quick search. It's a short, easy read, cites a reputable source and also points out an opposing viewpoint (look at the very bottom of the article).
I've read quite a bit about ethanol production from reputable sources over the years and decided that I'm not ready to accept it as the 'cure' to fossil fuel woes that some (corn growers are one example) are trying to say it is.
Do some Google searches for yourself and make up your own minds...don't take it for granted just because it sounds so good at first glance.
Originally posted by xmguyx23
i say that gas is going to hit 6.00$ a gallon in about 1 year..
gas now in michigan is about 3.25$ a gallon and with all this war in the middle east
there going to keep raising the prices and we sell out oil for less then them i dont see why we dont use our own..?