It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"5:21:03 p.m. Approximately 30 seconds later, Figure 5-21 shows the east mechanical penthouse disappearing into the building. It takes a few seconds for the east penthouse to "disappear" completely." - FEMA (05/02)
~5:21:08 p.m. Approximately 5 seconds later, the west mechanical penthouse disappears (Figure 5-22) or sinks into WTC 7.
~5:21:09 p.m. Approximately 1 or 2 seconds after the west penthouse sinks into WTC 7, the whole building starts to collapse. A north-south "kink" or fault line develops along the eastern side as the building begins to come down at what appears to be the location of the collapse initiation (see Figures 5-23 and 5-24).
~5:21:10 p.m. WTC 7 collapses completely after burning for approximately 7 hours (Figure 5-25). The collapse appeared to initiate at the lower floors, allowing the upper portion of the structure to fall." - FEMA (05/02)
"The debris generated by the collapse of WTC 7 spread mainly westward toward the Verizon building, and to the south... The average debris field radius was approximately 70 feet.
The collapse of WTC 7 had a small debris field as the facade was pulled downward, suggesting an internal failure and implosion." - FEMA (05/02)
"...when you need to bring down a massive structure, say a...skyscraper, you have to haul out the big guns. Explosive demolition is the preferred method for safely and efficiently demolishing larger structures. When a building is surrounded by other buildings, it may be necessary to "implode" the building, that is, make it collapse down into its footprint." - HowStuffWorks.com
America Rebuilds: A Year at Ground Zero -PBS (09/10/02)
Narrator: "World Trade Center 7 had always been considered the starting point for rebuilding.
Larry Silverstein, WTC Leaseholder: "I remember getting a call from the, uh, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'You know we've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is, is pull it.' Uh, and they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse." - Audio
-----------------
(Unidentified construction worker): "Hello? Oh, we're getting ready to pull building six."
Luis Mendes, NYC Dept of Design and Construction: "We had to be very careful how we demolished building six. We were worried about the building six coming down and then damaging the slurry walls, so we wanted that particular building to fall within a certain area." - Audio
Originally posted by HowardRoark
In fact, for all of those who claim that there was no “resistance” to the collapse, How come you never include the start of the collapse in your calculations?
Surely there is “resistance” of the frame to the failure from the point when the penthouse roof starts to sag and the point at which the rest of the building fails?
Originally posted by HowardRoark
The collapse of the penthouse is part of the collapse of the entire building. In fact, it is the START OF THE COLLAPSE!
Originally posted by esdad71
1) Nice Killtown, you jsut killed your own theory. It imploded after internal strucutral failure. During demo work, the primary charges are on the lower floors, with subsequent charges if needed farther up the buildings structure. Where are the explsoions when the Penthouse collapses?
2) Also, Don't put quotes from WTC 6, which they did destroy, in the same thread. WTC 6 was heavily damaged and was bought down. Let's not confuse them.
Originally posted by denythestatusquo
"Then it was about 5:00, because I was getting hungry. We were eating oatmeal cookies and watered-down Gatorade from the Salvation Army and the Red Cross. ... We walked back. We didn't do any further because building number seven was coming down. That was another problem, to wait for building seven to come down, because that was unsecure. It was about 5:30 that building came down." [WTC Task Force Interview]'
from Paul Thompson "The Terror Timeline" (pp. 466)
4:30 pm: WTC Building 7 Area is Evacuated
The area around WTC Building 7 is evacuated at this time. New York fire department chief officers, who have surveyed the building, have determined it is in danger of collapsing. Several senior firefighters have described this decision-making process. According to fire chief Daniel Nigro, "The biggest decision we had to make was to clear the area and create a collapse zone around the severely damaged building [WTC Building 7]. A number of fire offices and companies assessed the damage to the building. The appraisals indicated that the building's integrity was in serious doubt."
Originally posted by quango
Controlled demo or structural failure?
FEMA: "The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time."
The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse [“official theory”] remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel fuel on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis [fire/damage-caused collapse] has only a low probability of occurrence. Further research, investigation, and analyses are needed to resolve this issue. (FEMA, 2002, chapter 5; emphasis added.)
A New York Times article entitled “Engineers are baffled over the collapse of 7 WTC; Steel members have been partly evaporated,” provides relevant data.
Experts said no building like it [WTC7], a modern, steel-reinforced high-rise, had ever collapsed because of an uncontrolled fire. (Glanz, 2001; emphasis added.)
That’s correct – no such steel-beam building had ever before (or since) completely collapsed due to fires! However, such complete, symmetrical collapses have indeed occurred many times before -- all of them due to pre-positioned explosives in a procedure called “implosion” or controlled demolition. What a surprise, then, for such an occurrence in downtown Manhattan— three skyscrapers completely collapsed on the same day, September 11, 2001.
Engineers have been trying to figure out exactly what happened and whether they should be worried about other buildings like it around the country… Most of the other buildings in the [area] stood despite suffering damage of all kinds, including fire... ‘Fire and the structural damage …would not explain steel members in the debris pile that appear to have been partly evaporated’, Dr. [Jonathan] Barnett said. (Glanz, 2001; emphasis added.)
The blasters set the explosives so that each "tower" falls toward the center of the building, in roughly the same way that they would set the explosives to topple a single structure to the side. When the explosives are detonated in the right order, the toppling towers crash against each other, and all of the rubble collects at the center of the building. Another option is to detonate the columns at the center of the building before the other columns so that the building's sides fall inward.
In fact, for all of those who claim that there was no “resistance” to the collapse, How come you never include the start of the collapse in your calculations?
Originally posted by aelphaeis_mangaraeIf you don't count the second a bit the pent house takes to collapse, the building fell at the rate of free fall in a total vaccuum.
Howard is right, that IF the building fell because of fire, that when the pent house started collapsing other sections within the building probably would of been collapsing too.
Can anyone get any info on how WTC 7 was constructed? We have a bit on the Towers but not building 7.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Someone needs to make an animation illustrating how NIST is trying to say WTC7 fell.
It's so ridiculous, that such an animation would speak for itself. A vertical column fails straight down upon itself through the whole building because of localized fires, and then as a result, other columns later fall simultaneously, and straight down upon themselves, somehow bringing the whole building straight down upon itself in a symmetrical fashion. It all lands in a neat pile at the base. Falls at free-fall speed.
I understand that no amount of talk or discussion will get through to you guys about how ridiculous this would be without explosives. But maybe any illustration would. If not, then you don't really care for the truth. This is getting to become basic common sense. Once you begin to twist that to protect your beliefs, you're hopeless.
Report: CIA Lost Office In WTC
A secret office operated by the CIA was destroyed in the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center, seriously disrupting intelligence operations.
The undercover station was in 7 World Trade Center, a smaller office tower that fell several hours after the collapse of the twin towers on Sept. 11, a U.S. government official said.
The New York station was believed to have been the largest and most important CIA domestic station outside the Washington area.
www.cbsnews.com...
Cheney, CIA Long at Odds
The vice president’s history of tension with the agency may help explain why his office is an area of interest in the blown-cover probe.
By Tom Hamburger and Peter Wallsten, LA Times, October 20, 2005
WASHINGTON — For more than a decade, Dick Cheney has tussled with the CIA, first as secretary of Defense and later as vice president. Now that long and tortured history forms the backdrop of a federal probe into who named an undercover agency officer — an inquiry that is centering in part on Cheney’s office.
Originally posted by bsbray11
It's so ridiculous, that such an animation would speak for itself. A vertical column fails straight down upon itself through the whole building because of localized fires,
Originally posted by bsbray11
Once you begin to twist that to protect your beliefs, you're hopeless.