Supposed plot to blow up the Capitol building

www.trunews.com...

Listen to the audio for the date 04-05-06.

A supposed plot where there is a blackout at the capitol building, so that the 'electricians' (black ops) can plant explosives in the building ready to be set around April 16th, 2006. A russian mig body (no engine) to be shipped to the US from the UK to also help in this attack.

Basically if this is true, a russian mig will fly into the capitol building around April 16th, 2006 and have already planted explosives, detonate to make it look like this was all done by the mig. Just hear it and watch. It is either around the corner or not. I myself am convinced -2006- is the start of something undeniable, regardless. August 3rd, 2006 is one date to look for. But something will lead to this before that date.


godlikeproductions.com.../6/06

Granted it's GLP, but I came across this through there and would like to put out any possibilities of premeditated plans THIS YEAR from the illuminati/the family/the order to further their agenda. The more people that might hear of a plot before it plays out, then seeing it later, the more solid foundation for revolution and convincing people there is a group trying to manipulate the world to get what it wants.

The blackout happened as well as a sale of a Russian Mig. I Suggest to take it with a grain of salt, but don't overlook it.

[edit on 4-6-06 by pacman]

As far as the MiG sale, there are probably AT LEAST a couple dozen older MiGs flying around the US in private pilots hands. There's even a private demonstration team that flies Russian Built L-39s. I wouldn't read too much into this sale, as it s probably just that, someone bought one to zip around in.

Not positive I put this in the right forum, but will try.

But a blackout did happened last week.

www.foxnews.com...

What bigger news story also happened in the news with the Capitol recently? Rep. Mckinney. Could it be a distraction? Don't know.

news.google.com...
en.rian.ru...
Another recent news which might be relevant.
This mig was among containers and goods which seems strange to me. Why did Hong Kong Customs find an undeclared Russian Mig-29 with other random goods mixed with it?

The newspaper wrote, referring to its source in the customs body, that the MiG-29 might be put on public display when all the formalities had been settled.

And why no engine?

Easier to transport without questions of use is a possiblity or as it states, they might use it for public display.


I realize I am jumping after hearing these things, but it does seem plausable to an extent. And I'd rather question, than stand still. I love this website and know there are some that can take the baton if needed. Where can we go? In this case... it's not a very long track or wait.

*Some reason it's not letting me post in reply Zaphod so I'm editing.

Interesting. But I'm talking about the elite showing an illusion to the public. The facts are good to discuss as people will look at their BS explanation that a mig flew and did that. (If this happens!) Whew... if this does go down some people are aware at least, if it doesn't I don't care about my image of crying wolf here. Caution is always better than fear. Add what you think about it and thank you ahead of time.

[edit on 4-6-06 by pacman]

Two reasons for no engine:

1. Much lighter and easier to transport.
2. Russian engines SUCK. You can get a much more reliable engine built in the US that will fit in it with some modification. To give you an idea of how bad Russian engines can be, when the AN-225 goes to take off, they sit at the end of the runway for two minutes at full power and the brakes on. If they don't have an engine failure in the 2 minutes, they release the brakes and takeoff.

Now let me turn the tables on this.

WHY would they transport a MiG in with no engine to use in this? Finding a plane with no engine would be a giant red flag.

WHY would they use a MiG? Anyone who knows ANYTHING about aviation will know that it was BS if they use a MiG. There is NO POSSIBLE WAY a MiG will reach Washington on it's own. They don't have the range. Period. They can't fly across the Atlantic, and if they came through Alaska they'd have to make AT LEAST two stops for fuel along the way.

This whole "plot" is already falling apart, and has holes you could fly a 747 sideways through. Sure there was a blackout, but how do we know he didn't come up with this AFTER the blackout and then said "Look! The first part is true! There was a blackout!"

[edit on 4/6/2006 by Zaphod58]

I dont know about that whole Russian plane thing. I was however watching that day there was a black out. They said it was one of the oddest things they had seen. The white house itself was the only thing that had a power outage. Usually if there is a power outage then the stop lights go out too. They said it was just the building and it took a while for the back up generator to kick in. They had no idea what would cause this. The first thing that came to me, was OMG someone is going to blow it up. The police force got into a line with guns drawn and marched into the building. They said they didnt find anyone though, and then the power came back on. Way weird if you ask me.

As for a plane with out an engine, first thing that comes to my mind is someone is going to build a remote controll plane. I know nothing about planes though, so your guess is as good as mine.

Another hole in the theory, the blackout was WAY too short for the to rig the building. It was only about 30 minutes. There's no way they could rig the building in 30 minutes. It would be easier to just ship something into the basement in a big shipping crate (no one looks at those things), and have a big explosive device in that and gut the building that way.

Originally posted by Zaphod58
Another hole in the theory, the blackout was WAY too short for the to rig the building. It was only about 30 minutes.

From the FOX story:

Electricity was restored about half an hour later but officials decided to keep the building evacuated until the cause of the outage was determined, said Bob Stevenson, a spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn.

How long was the building evacuated to determine the cause?

I listened to the show for the 6th. This is a VERY interesting story... I have already had the opinion that we're being set up, but this is just one more indicator.

Good find, pacman!

thanks BH! I actually heard about the blackout, can't remember where though? Funny he did have three shows posted earlier this morning. He seems to have taken the 4-6-06 and 4-4-06 mp3 off for now. He must be getting some traffic.

For those that don't listen to the mp3...

Generally speaking, he is slow in getting out the information that he is sharing, but if you do listen to him he has alot of info that should be verified.

Someone he knew called him to tell him that someone his friend knew told him, don't be suprised if the power goes off in the next ten days at the capitol. And look what did happen. (I realize he could be lying, but I listened to the whole half hour and he does gather some interest) He says the info is from his friend is reliable to him and seems flabbergasted. He does bring up some good points about Russia and China devising war covertly at the same time the NWO is taking control of America. One ideaology against another is basically what is happening. The common people aren't told that whoevers' idealogy wins collects the pot of chips. Pillaging throughout history. Not distributing throughout the ages to the normal every day man. (Think!-1984 on a grander scale of time) But this is the one time in history that one side can 'believe' to extinguish or join the opposition leaving the common man as spare fodder in this war or union between themselves.


While this man on the mp3 seems to have a hard time getting out what he has to say I'll give him a break, he seems to bring alot forth that should be considered and looked into. Recent bill passed about congress being replaced in attack, the Mig confiscated in Hong Kong, the scud missle launcher found in california by F.B.I. (1 yr ago), the missing nukes, professor professing how to kill 90% of population with ebola, the friends recent phone call about capitol blackout, etc. I'm not believing what he says because I can't verify all this, but I will be aware of what happened to me on this day and I only have to remember this for probably just a little while. I sure hope nothing happens.


[edit on 4-6-06 by pacman]

Baird's Bill passed- news.bbc.co.uk...

Recent news on scuds, but I don't know if related, can't find FBI found California scuds a year ago news abclocal.go.com...
www.adn.com...

???what's going on lately with relations to China and Russia???
en.rian.ru...


might be carried away, but India???
www.indolink.com...

Reminds me what Shakespeare said, "All the worlds a stage And all the men and women merely players." Is it really all staged?

Sadly over time I've come to the conclusion... YES. But I/we do need to see it clearer though.



[edit on 4-6-06 by pacman]

xinhuanet

Capitol Police said in a statement that a power spike that affected much of the DC metropolitan area knocked out power to the Capitol building and caused lights and cable TV reception to flicker throughout the Capitol complex.

Chicago Tribune

Mary-Beth Hutchinson, a spokeswoman for Potomac Electric Power Co., said the electricity shut off automatically after there was "a momentary drop in voltage due to customer operations up the lines" away from the Capitol.

Noon to about 1:15pm the people were not let in per what the news says comparing them. Also why would Mary-Beth Hutchinson make that statement when I thought that the Capitol has it's own supply?

CBS News

"The protective equipment sensed the significant change in voltage and tripped," she said.

A Department of Homeland Security official said it was a "simple power outage" that affected only the Capitol and not any nearby office buildings, CBS News reports.

Conflicting statements?


Mod Edit to shorten links.

[edit on 6-4-2006 by Benevolent Heretic]

Thanks!!!


[edit on 4-6-06 by pacman]

The first statment totaly conflicts with what was on the news at that time. They said that the reason it was so odd was because the white house was the only place that didnt have power. They had no idea why people were evacuated, but since they only evacuated the white house and no nearby areas, they thought it was so that no one would get hurt in the dark, like falling down the stairs. They also said that the back up generator was acting odd. It took longer to come on, and when it did, everything just flickered instead of just comming on like it usually does. After the power came back on, there was talk of letting people back in, but they had not allowed that before they switched to something else, so I have no clue when they let people back in.

Doggum it. I'm the only one who cant hear this???



I did hear of the blackout and this stinks to high heaven. Like everything else.

Thank you for the post.

Can anyone burn a CD of this? I don't know how.

And why has the site changed since this morning? I listened to the show for today.

Edit: Nothing mysterious. Sounds like the same file.

[edit on 6-4-2006 by Benevolent Heretic]

Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic

Originally posted by Zaphod58
Another hole in the theory, the blackout was WAY too short for the to rig the building. It was only about 30 minutes.

From the FOX story:

Electricity was restored about half an hour later but officials decided to keep the building evacuated until the cause of the outage was determined, said Bob Stevenson, a spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn.

How long was the building evacuated to determine the cause?

I listened to the show for the 6th. This is a VERY interesting story... I have already had the opinion that we're being set up, but this is just one more indicator.

Good find, pacman!

Even if they were kept out for 2 hours, part of one day isn't going to be enough to wire the building for demo. It's kind of like the theory that they rigged both WTC towers in somethng like 30 hours. It generally takes days, or even weeks to rig a building for demo. It's a very precise science.

Zaphod,

Remember Bruce Willis in Armageddon? They simply get the best of the best to do a job and beleive me, nothing is impossible.

Originally posted by Zaphod58
Even if they were kept out for 2 hours, part of one day isn't going to be enough to wire the building for demo. It's kind of like the theory that they rigged both WTC towers in somethng like 30 hours. It generally takes days, or even weeks to rig a building for demo. It's a very precise science.

1. They wouldn't have to wire it for the entire thing to come down. Just blow the floozie out of the room where congress meets.

2. Any amount of preparation could have been made days, weeks, months ahead of time, by 'janitors', such that a final team could go in and within 2 hours, set things up lickitty-split.

It may very will be this is as likely that the twin towers being rigged. But, I believe they were, too. Time will tell, I suppose.

I just want it to be known that last year, I predicted the 2006 elections would not happen.

Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
I just want it to be known that last year, I predicted the 2006 elections would not happen.

I am your witness and furthermore, there will not be a new president either. (My prediction) I still stand by it. By then,....:shk:

Mod Edit to add quote tags.

Mod Note: How to Quote – Please Review This Link.


[edit on 6-4-2006 by Benevolent Heretic]

Capitol's Power Plant

courtesy: Wiki


More on a different power company- PEPCO

courtesy:sprol.com


Am I missing something here? PEPCO spoke up on another companies problems. PEPCO has enough problems on it's own.

[edit on 4-6-06 by pacman]

My first thought in regards to the mig was could it be possible to rig it to become remote controlled device? The mig story was generated in the same news stories for that day, perhaps not pertaining to the blackout conspiracy.

So just who does supply power to the Capital building? Is it Pepco or the Capital Power Plant? Wiki states steam, and cool air says nothing of power supply. From www.aoc.gov...

The Capitol Power Plant began providing electricity in 1910; today, it provides steam for heating and chilled water for cooling buildings within the Capitol Complex.

Let us not forget that this story is being told by a "credible friend" of his over a telephone of whom he will not name. We have no proof of the call only this gentlemen's word. Although listening to him sounds convincing, is that enough? Perhaps for some. But it reeks of a story line plot from Tom Clancy's, "Executive Orders"

Putting on the conspiracy hat, what would concern me most is that if something was to happen, congress and senators would be in session for debates over the immigration laws. That's a hell of a lot of people to go up in smoke. Then there lies the Doomsday Plan www.boston.com...

My first thought in regards to the mig was could it be possible to rig it to become remote controlled device? The mig story was generated in the same news stories for that day, perhaps not pertaining to the blackout conspiracy.

So just who does supply power to the Capital building? Is it Pepco or the Capital Power Plant? Wiki states steam, and cool air says nothing of power supply. From www.aoc.gov...

The Capitol Power Plant began providing electricity in 1910; today, it provides steam for heating and chilled water for cooling buildings within the Capitol Complex.

Let us not forget that this story is being told by a "credible friend" of his over a telephone of whom he will not name. We have no proof of the call only this gentlemen's word. Although listening to him sounds convincing, is that enough? Perhaps for some. But it reeks of a story line plot from Tom Clancy's, "Executive Orders"

Putting on the conspiracy hat, what would concern me most is that if something was to happen, congress and senators would be in session for debates over the immigration laws. That's a hell of a lot of people to go up in smoke. Then there lies the Doomsday Plan www.boston.com...

Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic

Originally posted by Zaphod58
Even if they were kept out for 2 hours, part of one day isn't going to be enough to wire the building for demo. It's kind of like the theory that they rigged both WTC towers in somethng like 30 hours. It generally takes days, or even weeks to rig a building for demo. It's a very precise science.

1. They wouldn't have to wire it for the entire thing to come down. Just blow the floozie out of the room where congress meets.

That's kinda what I said earlier *points up thread* WHY rig the building when it would so much easier to ship a crate into the basement, loaded with an explosive, and gut the building that way. So much easier, so many fewer people involved, so much less effort....