It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Contentious
"I feel sorry for you, since you're so dead set on the violence as the only option left to us. That's the way that 'they' want you to think, because 'they' know you'll give up, and then 'they'll' have won. I'm not gonna lay down and die for ANYONE!! I don't give up for no reason. True, it may come to violent blows one day, but for now, we need to exhaust ALL other options before we resort to the throwing of fists. It should be the last option available to us. "
I want you to read this please.
And you tell me something, if there were no starving children, if there were no MOUNTAIN of MUSLIMS murdered by the U.S. military, if there were no uncureable diseases, and if the Mexicans even came over here and volunteered to be your Slaves.
With the situation described in that thread alone,
HOw in the hell are you going to tell me that YOU are NOT going to lay down for ANYONE!
It's like.... "they" right in front of your FACE on t.v,
Pretend it's a bunch doing this to YOU !! Whoever you like to label as the Bad Bad MEN.
Your not gonna lay down and die? Let's see if You can move.
Go CAMP OUT on the Front LAWN !!
You won't even demand ONE answer, and your gonna 'negotiate' an appropriate solution to this WAR. With who ?
GO SEE if 'they' will even TALK to any of YOU.
lissen,
Stop,Drop and ROLL
don't ask questions, if you are going to do something then JUST DO IT !
Quit jack'n around trying to prepare for how you think it might will turn out while WE are still burning. You won't fight back because you are scared to address the MAN or deal with the consequences so just "stay tuned" .
Now that you can possibly see what and who 'they' are actually DOing .
And I apologize for this if 'the people' does not apply to you.
Edit for inflammatory language
[edit on 16-4-2006 by masqua]
Originally posted by Contentious
It's just a matter of, when you don't care what is happening to 'them' for a long enough time, then you don't care what happens to YOU.
And obviously you don't .
If it doesn't set a FIRE in you MIND that there are TWO chemicals in your FOOD that have either stolen your minds or your instinctual desire to protect your own bodies, compliments of the WHITE HOUSE,
then they have you all SCREWED!
I just hope somebody comes along that isn't still too scared to ASK questions about the contents of his family's FOOD, who isn't intimidated by the consequences of LOCKING somebody down for this.
Originally posted by Contentious, while Quoting TheBorg
"No doubts, this is an evil world. However, I find it troubling that every post you've made has been so emotionally charged and loaded with rhetoric that it's almost funny. I think that maybe you've been into this subject a bit too long, and need a long holiday. If you cannot manage your behaviour during a debate, then I suggest you sit it out. "
Yeah, don't get upset about not having a clue of how to save YOUR ass now. I am not here to debate or negotiate with an approach to obtaining your own human rights with you. Nobody else has even considered the potential or benefit that could come out of doing this.... it's too hard to TRY.
Originally posted by TheBorg, but quoted by Contentious
"If you do ANY looking at all, it's US soldiers getting killed every day. We lose anywhere from 3 to 53 people per day on avg due to the war effort. Now tell me that that's an acceptable solution. You see what kind of response violence gets for you? "
They wouldn't still be getting killed if Americans didn't accept a war to continue against an 'enemy' for attacking this nation on 9/11. I don't remember seeing anybody launching sea to land missles on a city of sleeping soldiers, and eventho' everybody knows the war is b.s., you still don't have a problem with the death of the people that the US soldiers went over there to "take down", for attacking you, right? Shame on those people for not bowing down or liking the American/Israel alliance that is doing it dog fashioned to your food.
Originally posted by TheBorg, but quoted by Contentious
"but until you can give me some solid facts as to the nature of this "infection", then I suggest you do some more research and stop touting things as facts when you have no evidence to support them "
FACT
If I gave you the security code to the vault inside a bank located in the middle of the desert , you wouldn't get off your ass and go over there to kick the front door down.
How many people need to write an Aspartame is KILLING People book?
www.dorway.com...
Google "aspartame formaldehyde" if you need more info on this.
And the most important information on this page is in the dates of the last time anybody even tried to get this drug out of the milk. This one has a "freak amino acid" in it and apparently science is interested in finding out the long term effects of THAT on whoever they want because nobody can label the chemical as 'toxic' eventho' it's been banned all the way around the world. "They" said it does your body good now, and maybe another freak amino acid American will be joining the rest of the gang in the White House very soon also.
Originally posted by TheBorg, but quoted by Contentious
"If people would all just stand up and say they've had enough, those in power will listen, because without us, they're nothing"
If if were a skiff we could all go for a of boatride. The people who lost loved one in 9/11 that cannot accept what they have been told by this government, has not organized a protest on the front lawn to demand JUSTICE by someone in the administration. Nobody has even ACKNOWLEDGED OUR EXISTENCE concerning the video evidence and the first hand claims from the fire-fighters that heard "synchronized explosions" as the towers came down.
Hopefully something more 'unsettling' doesn't have to happen to your own people before 'the people' feel a strong enough URGE for some truth.
George Bush Jr. and Sr. are about as significant as J.R. Ewing to your future the rest of the way from here on out. If you think anything that man will speak about in public will help to make things "clearer" in this country,,,
Cheech & Chong are on the way to rescue you now.
Originally posted by TheBorg, but quoted by Contentious
" You made this about a war. I'm merely trying to provide a simple, peaceful solution to try and PREVENT a war. To me, it sounds like you're the one trying to foment discontent within the American ranks to incite war. "
I sent a direct threatening letter to the D.O.D. titled "AMERICANS ARE UNDER ATTACK!!" and everything else the threat included.
You want to prevent a WAR because you won't acknowledge who has your ass SCREWED to the wall right NOW. For some reason none of this information bothers you people, maybe it's because the influence from the source of the poisoning is so tremendous so I'm trying to remain polite about it.
Would it help if I reached through this monitor wrapped my hand around your throat pulled you face right up against this monitor and Growled
"ARE YOU AT WAR NOW?"
Originally posted by Contentious
Now, back on topic:
You are NOT fighting back because it's still not within your ability to consider EVERY ONE , IF by some miracle you were able to make a change to how the USDA is refusing a meatpacker his rights to test for MAD-COW !!!
IF this administration was Questioned your fantasy of experiencing a 'peaceful solution' would haunt you all the way into the ground. IF they told the truth about ANY aspect of the USG that has FAILED to protect our food, bodies, minds, environment, MORALS, or future it might sound better if for some reason you expect the TRUTH to come out of the horses mouth.
It is going to hurt like hell and just get worse while you procrastinate.
THAT is what making a 'sacrifice' is all about.
The plans that you are thinking and sharing here do not apply to Saving Your Own LIVES ! THIS is how you LOST them.
If you insist on doing something "peacefully", I would get others involved in the "Sec of Defense launched a FORMALDEHYDE attack on YOUR minds" issue. It was effective, you can't move on this.
Originally posted by Contentious
Unless you need more facts to keep you sedated in that PEACE filled state of mind.
I understand there is a line that can't be crossed where you could actually discuss who what when or where to FIGHT for your LIFE online. So there really is nothing else to discuss in this thread. Because if you don't see a reason to fight or an enemy to escape from, you are NOT fighting because you are GLUEd to a computer looking for peacefull discussions to share those great ideas with others who are also GLUEd to a system that likes SCREWING with your FOOD.
Originally posted by Contentious
"America will still be America even if we must change the government because a nation is made up of it's people, not it's politicians. "
If nobody finds a group of PEOPLE to demand some ANSWERS, it will be called "UP#CreekWithoutAPaddle" by everybody in the world very very soon.
DEMAND Answers . Not a fight.
Originally posted by godservant
US, Canada, Brittain, Austrailia and other countries - rights and freedoms are being taken away at a steady pace.
""Dr Suzanne Wuerthele, US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) toxicologist, "This technology is being promoted, in the face of concerns by respectable scientists and in the face of data to the contrary, by the very agencies which are supposed to be protecting human health and the environment. The bottom line in my view is that we are confronted with the most powerful technology the world has ever known, and it is being rapidly deployed with almost no thought whatsoever to its consequences."- ""
"EPA carries out a significant portion of its mission through the Operating Program, which includes its core responsibilities for regulatory development, enforcement, research, and program grants to states."
"The program guarantees results, by eliminating costly regulation, litigation, inspection, and enforcement actions. As a result, industry compliance has been nearly 100 percent."
Children who live in polluted communities are five times more likely to have clinically low lung function -less than 80 percent of the lung function expected for their age.
"Among U.S. residents, 1 in 2 men and 1 in 3 women will develop cancer at some point in their lifetimes. Research shows that environmental factors trigger diseases like cancer, especially when someone has a family history,"
The FDA has failed to investigate the effects of long-term feeding of IGF- 1 and rBGH-milk on growth, or on more sensitive sub-cellular effects, in infant rats or infants of any other species.
**"We are conducting a vast toxicological experiment, and we are using our children as the experimental animals." -- Dr. Philip Landrigan, Chairman, Preventive Medicine, Mt. Sinai School of Medicine
**"With chemicals, it's shoot first and ask questions later." -- Al Meyerhoff, former attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council
In 1967", Monsanto enters into a joint venture with IG_Farben", the key supplier of poison gas to the Nazi racial extermination program.-
“A Monsanto official told the New York Times that the corporation should not have to take responsibility for the safety of its food products. "Monsanto should not have to vouchsafe the safety of biotech food," said Phil Angell, Monsanto's director of corporate communications.
"Our interest is in selling as much of it as possible. Assuring its safety is the FDA's job."
The Codex Alimentarius Commission, the U.N. Food Safety Agency representing 101 nations worldwide, has ruled unanimously in favor of the 1993 European moratorium on Monsanto's genetically engineered hormonal milk (rBGH).
The FDA says it is now in a listening mode. If its ears are truly opened, then its conscience should have been touched. What is at stake is the safety of the nation's and ultimately the world's food supply.
What is troubling is that the government tries to deny that any genetically engineered food has caused harm. It is just running away from reality.
Labeling and long-term safety testing are only two steps in that process and we should not go another day without them. It is unfair, unsafe and unwise. As the evidence continues to come out, it is no longer rhetorical to ask what the industry is trying to hide by not labeling these foods, and why the insurance companies will not touch bioengineered food.
As mentioned on the earlier panel, rBGH has been rejected in every major industrialized nation. In fact, a recent report by Health Canada indicates that the FDA misreported the findings of Monsanto's ninety-day rat feeding study. Even the heavily corporate-influenced Kodak's alimentary commission has refused to certify the safety of rBGH despite heavy pressure from the United States. Yet, we are forced to eat and drink products from cows injected with rBGH in secret because of prohibitive labeling requirements written for the FDA by a Monsanto employee.
There are several actions that need to be taken that are out of the FDA's hands, including ratification of the conventional and biological diversity for which it is shameful that the United States has not signed.
The greatest controversy in FDA history was the approval process for Monsanto's genetically engineered bovine growth hormone. We shouldn't be here today. We should not be in this room, and I shouldn't be here because in 1994 Congress had a Bill that was going to require mandatory labeling of all foods that were influenced by genetic engineering.
When Monsanto made their genetically engineered bovine growth hormone, they noticed that laboratory animals were getting cancer, and they noticed that cows were getting mastitis, ulcers on their udders; they were putting more pus and bacteria into the milk. In 1958 Robert Delaney, a Congressman from New York, put in a Delaney Amendment. It was named after him. The Delaney Amendment stated that if a food additive caused cancer it was not to be approved -- pretty good law, right?
Well, Monsanto got their attorney, Michael Taylor from the firm of King and Spaulding -- by the way, when they started in 1979 they groomed their attorney now in the Supreme Court, Clarence Thomas, the same law firm -- Monsanto's attorney, Michael Taylor wrote and minimized the Delaney Amendment, an interpretation of the Delaney Amendment which became the new protocol, the new standard operating procedure at FDA. They minimized cancer. Michael Taylor was hired by the Food and Drug Administration and became the second most powerful man there, Monsanto's attorney. He wrote the standard operating procedures. In other words, we see cancer; ignore it.
Margaret Miller, Susan Sechen, Monsanto's scientists, were hired by the FDA to review Monsanto's own research. Margaret Miller knew cows were getting mastitis. The first week at the FDA, December 3, 1989, she was given broad power -- and here is an effect of genetic engineering nobody has considered -- she knew cows were getting sick from the genetically engineered hormone; she changed the amount of antibiotics that farmers could have in their milk. She increased it by 100 times.
Jerome Moore's paper said “if there is a middle of the chain protein change there could be Alzheimer's, or sickle cell anemia, or diabetes. Monsanto, four months after the hormone was approved, one of their scientists, Bernard Violand, published, in the July 3, 1994 issue of the journal Protein Science evidence that Monsanto made a mistake. Oops! Monsanto created a freak amino acid!
It seems to me that we are embarking on a dangerous path from which we cannot return and this government is making a grave error in judgment by not exercising more prudence.
Given the history of repeated assurances by the government and corporations and a long list of technologies such as pesticides, antibiotics or RbGH that were all declared safe based on research and then to find out, a few years later, that crucial evidence was not evaluated properly or even suppressed and now are shown to be unsafe.
I have come to have little or no confidence in the government's ability to exercise sound judgment in these matters on its own. The bottom line is that we don't need genetic engineering. This path primarily benefits those who are reaping the profits.
I do not appreciate being treated as a guinea pig. I believe genetic engineering violates nature and I am deeply concerned that we have no way of cleaning up any unintended environmental catastrophes.
Zenda Avesta, c. 3000 BC
There are three things which build and maintain civilization throughout time: pure air, pure water, and pure food. And as an eternal truth I say unto you, that there are three things which bring the end of civilization, even the mightiest that have ever been and shall ever be, from the beginningless beginning to the endless end of all time: impure air, impure water, and impure food.
Originally posted by Long Lance
If these elitists are as powerful and influential as they've displayed to be, then it's only logical to at least contemplate if Earth's current problems are the deliberate result of long term planning, with all that entails.
Originally posted by tracer
Seems to me like the governments use of divide and conquer is working well with the two on this thread who cant seem to come to some kind of semblance of understanding instead of fighting and challengeing each other. Come on people thats just what the government wants to see, we the people infighting and blinded to the things they want to lay down on us. And they have been having their way with that divide and conquer for so long, with whatever means they found that work.. Forgive me if Im wrong and keep right on fighting with each other, thats two less people the powers that be have to worry about becoming united as one.
[edit on 17-4-2006 by tracer]