It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by lonestar
This true way of life is not a matter of opinion. There are absolute truths and relative truths. The rules of dietetics have changed many times in my lifetime. Many scientific findings have changed from year to year. The scientists taught for decades that the world was once a nebulous, molten mass cast off from the sun, and later many scientists said it once was a whirl of dust which solidified. There are many ideas advanced to the world that have been changed to meet the needs of the truth as it has been discovered. There are relative truths, and there are also absolute truths which are the same yesterday, today, and forever�never changing. These absolute truths are not altered by the opinions of men. As science has expanded our understanding of the physical world, certain accepted ideas of science have had to be abandoned in the interest of truth. Some of these seeming truths were stoutly maintained for centuries. The sincere searching of science often rests only on the threshold of truth, whereas revealed facts give us certain absolute truths as a beginning point so we may come to understand the nature of man and the purpose of his life.
The earth is spherical. If all the four billion people in the world think it flat, they are in error. That is an absolute truth, and all the arguing in the world will not change it. Weights will not suspend themselves in the air, but when released will fall earthward. The law of gravity is an absolute truth. It never varies. Greater laws can overcome lesser ones, but that does not change their undeniable truth.
Spencer W. Kimball, �Absolute Truth,� Ensign, Sept. 1978, 3
Originally posted by uIVIa
And this is what I would call limiting your thinking. How would the human race evolve technologically if we thought that each law was absolute? We don't even know what gravity is. We can measure it, that is it.
Originally posted by deafence#
yes uIVIa, all truth is personal, i was merely pointing out that it didn't make sense, logically, but then again personal truth overrides logic so i guess i was looking to start some simple talk....
Originally posted by uIVIa
Originally posted by banjoechef
i think the truth is the only thing that'll save our asses, no more of this mass deception
Save from what? Physical death? That will happen anyway. What do you require saving from? [/quote
\\\\\\\\++++++++////////
LUNATICS & meglo-maniacs, et al
ranters & ravers, who are convinced, theirs is the ONLY TRUE & SURE SALVATION
And Everyone Else Had Better Fall In Line !!!
browse away at: deoxy.org...
www.paradise-engineering.com...
Originally posted by lonestar
Originally posted by uIVIa
And this is what I would call limiting your thinking. How would the human race evolve technologically if we thought that each law was absolute? We don't even know what gravity is. We can measure it, that is it.
I think the point is that each law is not absolute, because things are always changing. Right when we think we know what we are talking about, we find out that we dont really have a clue. There are some things that are absolute truths. There are many, however, that are not.
If you think that all truths are absolute, you are the one who is limiting your thinking.
Originally posted by riffraffalunas
Originally posted by uIVIa
Originally posted by banjoechef
i think the truth is the only thing that'll save our asses, no more of this mass deception
Save from what? Physical death? That will happen anyway. What do you require saving from? [/quote
\\\\\\\\++++++++////////
LUNATICS & meglo-maniacs, et al
ranters & ravers, who are convinced, theirs is the ONLY TRUE & SURE SALVATION
And Everyone Else Had Better Fall In Line !!!
browse away at: deoxy.org...
www.paradise-engineering.com...
What?! You question my Non-Truths? My non-truths are the TRUE SALVATION!
Seriously though, I think what I most like to convey in my interactions with others is that this level of thought chess is fun but only if weight is not attached to the thought. If all thoughts are given the same weight instead of some considered dirty, mean, stupid, intelligent, etc all sorts of interactions and integrations can be made without restrictions. And since we can't measure the weight of thoughts I suppose they all weigh the same anyway.