It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Two Steps Forward
Smith, a Democrat, was long the leading opponent of civil rights laws for Blacks
en.wikipedia.org...
This current crop of Democratic "leadership" is a disgrace to the name of the party, imo. They need to be removed before any meaningful change can happen in the party.
I absolutely agree with this statement, though we may differ on the reasons why
If the Democrats are to remain a progressive party, they must accept the fact that this means opposing the selfish interests of corporate America. Unfortunately, the Democrats are so much on the corporate take, that they have redefined themselves as the other corporatist party differing from the Republicans only on social issues. They have betrayed the working people whom they used to represent.
That's what needs to change.
Originally posted by ceci2006
But, Two Steps Forward, I just wanted to say that I'm a "she" not a "he" focusing on the New Deal of the Democratic Party.
Originally quoted by jsobecky
Wow. Do you see a face, or two vases? I thought he was referring to Howard Smith.
Originally quoted by jsobecky
Just goes to show you how important it is to understand where the other person is coming from, eh?
Originally quoted by jsobecky
You mentioned Kerry's wife, and made some reference to her ties to big business, etc. That struck me as interesting. Do you think JK should try to distance himself from his wife's wealth? Iow, do you see her wealth and business ties as a positive or a negative, or totally irrelevant?
Originally quoted by Seekerof
Sure they should, according to a proper time and place.
You can bet that very soon, some Americans rights to dissent at military funerals will soon be justly and rightly taken away.
Originally posted by seagull
Support a cause, or dissent against it, by whatever legal means available.
This is what keeps our country free. When the voices of dissent are silenced, we are no longer a free nation. So shout loud and long if you must. All I ask is that you practise a little decourum and civility.
Originally posted by Seekerof
Should American's Citizens have the right to dissent?
Sure they should, according to a proper time and place.
You can bet that very soon, some Americans rights to dissent at military funerals will soon be justly and rightly taken away.
Lawmaker proposes bill to ban protests at military funerals
And what is the proper time and place to dissent? The only one I have heard of protesting at military funerals is that so called reverend Fred Phelps...and while I think what he does is obscene, if we take away the right to protest, at events we consider inappropraite, that is just the beginning of taking them away period. Protest zones are such an effort. Bush is such a coward he can't even face those who disagree with him.
seekerof