It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
What do you think folks? Do we have a case?
So you say that people who work hard for their money should have worked for nothing because...ohh...when you die it's all worthless.
...And it would take a heck of a lot of shares to live entirely off of dividends, anyway.
Originally posted by dawnstar
then 500 of those people sell their shares of stock to other people for let's say $10 more than what they paid, they've made a ten dollar profit, along with the money that they invested in the company. the person who just bought the stock, well, they now have an investment in the company, but the company already gained their capital from the original buyer, so well, the second buyer really didn't contribute to the capital of the company, did they?
and does the company recognize the new "value" or the stock if the new owner of it decided to cash it in to them? did the company's assetts magically increase by ten dollars when he bought the stock?
Originally posted by dawnstar
so, the companies can borrow against PERCIEVED value...just like many homeowners have borrowed agianst the inflated PERCIEVED value of their home...
when the perception changes, which sooner or later, I got a feeling it will, well, we end up with alot of businesses and people with alot of debt along with a more realistic vision of their assetts. and this is good?
in plain simple words the speculators, who aren't interested in any long term investment but rather a quick profit by flipping that peice or real estate or stock at a higher price, are the winners, the actual investors are the loser.....the speculators are driving up the buying price by their demand, while in actuality, the actual value isn't near that, and the long term prospect for the assett is even dimmer....