It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by df1
People are jumping on you and shots because you are more concerned with Heller than you are with Diebold which has disenfranchised every voter in the stinking country.
Originally posted by LazarusTheLong
I think personally that the person who did this, knew they might get in trouble, but it was neccessary... I feel the same.
Sandi Gibbons, spokeswoman for the Los Angeles County district attorney's office, refused to call Heller a "whistle-blower."
"We call him a defendant," she said. "He's accused of breaking the law…. If we feel that the evidence shows beyond a reasonable doubt in our minds that a crime has been committed, it's our job as a criminal prosecutor to file a case."
Although state law protects whistle-blowers from retaliation by their employers, they can still be criminally prosecuted, said Tom Devine, legal director at the Washington, D.C.-based Government Accountability Project.
Originally posted by shots
Diebold is not the only one that makes voting machines.
Better luck next time.
Originally posted by df1
Diebold does not need to control all voting machines to corrupt the outcome of elections. Your attempt to muddy the waters by bringing more voting machine manufacturers into the discussion does not exonerate Diebold of anything.
People are jumping on you and shots because you are more concerned with Heller than you are with Diebold which has disenfranchised every voter in the stinking country.
Originally posted by shots
Now I ask you, how can they possibly disenfranchise every voter when their machines are not the only ones used
Originally posted by shots
Now I ask you, how can they possibly disenfranchise every voter when their machines are not the only ones used
Originally posted by df1
It is pretty damn clear that if Diebold gear was used to steal the vote in Ohio which resulted in giving the presidential election to Bush that Diebold ripped off the voters of the other 49 states, even if Ohio was the only state to use Diebold voting gear.
Originally posted by shots
Really are you sure those machines you refer to in Ohio were all Diebold's?
Originally posted by denythestatusquo
since when is a lawyer an expert in programming, computer hardware and voting systems?
Sounds like a democratic partisan hack trying to take down the Republicans for obvious reasons.
What I have found interesting about the past two federal elections was that there was never a hint by media, government or critics as to the potential of cheating by Democrats and their supporters. Wide spread cheating by the left around the world in elections is routinely reported and accepted fact but for some reason the party on the left in the US is perfectly clean. I doubt it myself.
Originally posted by intrepid
Originally posted by shots
Really are you sure those machines you refer to in Ohio were all Diebold's?
Not getting the point shots, are you saying they weren't? If so, why?
Originally posted by shots
Really are you sure those machines you refer to in Ohio were all Diebold's?
Originally posted by df1
Diebold gear did not need to be used in all precincts in ohio for Diebold to control the outcome of the election. Your representation that such is required is pure unadulterated poppycock.