Lake Champlain NY Loch Ness - new video!!!

Here is a couple of pics from the video I found at Bigfoot Forums.com.

I am sure the fishermen could see in the water better than the camera could.

Here is the other pic. Very strange indeed.

If I was in the water and that thing came up to me I'd die on the spot. My heart would burst apart from fear. I mean look at the size the that neck! It's head is about 2 feet wide! And just like most people say the head kinda looks like a horse head.

If there is such an animal in the lake since 19 century, so it must live in the lake much more than one individual. If there is a population with a considerable size, with enought animals to ensure the survival of the specie, it would be easy to catch one.
More...Does the lake have enought food to sustain such a population?A population of 30/40/50 individuals, each one weighing tons, would require tons of fish per week.

And another point... people are saying it might be a large sturgin or cat fish? Well I doubt that's what it was because cat fish are bottom dwelers, they don't swim up to a boat almost to the surface, and considering it looks like this boat wasn't near the shore, the sturgin explination is a negative no-go in my book. I think it's an unknown species we're dealing with. Look at the head on that thing and the length of the neck. Anacondas don't dwel in lakes in upstate NY.

Real shame the fishermen didn't get better angles of this. I guess I can understand they were frightened to get any closer. I'd be as well lol.

And unfortunately, that doesn't look like much. Could indeed be a sturgeon or a huge catfish. Yes, they are bottom dwellers, but that doesn't mean they don't ever rarely come up. This would explain why these sightings are so rare. When these large fish to surface, who's around to witness it? And when somebody does finally witness it, it's gonna looking really weird and strange.

I really don't know, myself.

Even if the were right up on the thing videotaping (which they were), the camera wouldn't have cought it on tape. They were close enough to see it themselves and thought their camera would catch the same image. THey were wrong.

I see a larger body in the front of that tenticle. Reminds me of tremors.

I know this is probably a stupid question, but I was wondering whats this?




[edit on 24-2-2006 by Murdoku][email protected]

[/U RL]][email protected]

[edit on 24-2-2006 by Murdoku]

Get out the depth charges!!!

Murdoku, I think it could be part of the body. Maybe the top hump of it's back. You can't see where the neck ends, but maybe it's long neck goes down to connect to the body but the back goes up higher than where the neck base connects? Make any sense?


What ever it is (part of the body or not) it looks like the same color as the head and neck.

Awesome vid clip. Definetley the closest video shot of a "monster" ever, besides that lake monster in Turkey that was probably a hoax.

I understand that the alleged Lake Champlain creature and the one on Loch Ness are both mysterious marine life, but I fail to find a connection between the two.

Please explain more clearly the meaning of your title; I am sitting here scratching my head and doing online searches trying to figure out what the connection is between the two places. Your title just mentions location names, but then all the info I can find never ties the two locations together with the exception of the fact that each has an alleged beast.

I guess you could say I am wondering if you are implying a connection between the two creatures as a species common to two continents and/or the North Atlantic area, which is what I am thinking. A loose idea, but one potentially worth more consideration.

This animation of the clip shows head movement different than a fish would be able to do. Found this at Bigfoot Forums.com done by one of their members.




and also another member put these clips together with enhancement. You can click on each to enlarge.
Found Here

Anyone have a link which isnt in Flash?

Please explain this. There is no way for a fish to do move back and forth in this fashion. I would love to see the original film the clarity would be much better.




[edit on 26-2-2006 by Harry55]

I think the GIF's looping is making the creature go back and forth, but now that I see more of the motion like this, it really does look fishy (haha, sorry for the pun ). Interested to see how a large sturgeon or eel or catfish could produce that kind of shape. There's a long slender extension and what possibly could be a fin flapping jutting right under the boat??? Argh, too blurry to be sure of anything.

Is it me - when looking at the enhanced "back and forth" it looks kind of like a "mouth" opening slightly and closing as it pulls away from the side of the boat?

Compelling video, regardless.

I can kind see that too. Champ looks kinda cute in fact.

Originally posted by Caetano
If there is such an animal in the lake since 19 century, so it must live in the lake much more than one individual. If there is a population with a considerable size, with enought animals to ensure the survival of the specie, it would be easy to catch one.
More...Does the lake have enought food to sustain such a population?A population of 30/40/50 individuals, each one weighing tons, would require tons of fish per week.

Lake Champlain is fed by a water way that leads up to Canada, and then is connected to the Atlantic, so maybe "Champ" swims in just to feed or mate once a year, and a much a larger population lives in the Atlantic.

When I use the term "Champ" I mean any and all of theses creatures.

-- Boat