It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by seaofgreen
I think you implied it: Paul was assassinated in '66 for not being a team player; the implication is that the other three (having not been assassinated in '66) were team players. Of course, if this was not what you intended to imply, please clarify.
If all you're going to do is make up vague stories with no evidence to back them up
ev⋅i⋅dence [ev-i-duhns] Show IPA noun, verb, -denced, -denc⋅ing.
–noun
1. that which tends to prove or disprove something; ground for belief; proof.
2. something that makes plain or clear ...
3. Law. data presented to a court or jury in proof of the facts in issue and which may include the testimony of witnesses, records, documents, or objects.
dictionary.reference.com...
Rule 401. Definition of "Relevant Evidence"
"Relevant evidence" means evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.
www.law.cornell.edu...
Originally posted by switching yard
There are posters on this thread who seem to take it as a job to tear down this thread with ridicule.
But ridicule is precisely the tactic that disinfo agents and the controlled mass media use to try to control the masses. When a UFO case appears in the mainstream media they always make a light-hearted joke about it. To this day, they still use this ridicule technique.
When I see ridicule being used in relation to a mystery, I am always more attuned to the possibility that those being ridiculed are on to something real and the ones who hurl the ridicule are agents whose job it is to "put out the fires".
I am almost half way through reading every page on this thread and I see the usual ridicule and vehement denial that is the classic footprint of disinfo agents working for intel agencies and on the job trying to put down the theorists.
Why do these posters seem to work so hard to try to derail the discussion? What's in it for them if they are not on some covert payroll?
This thread has been very actively monitored by some posters who've been working hard every day to make ridicule of it and make it go away.
If the PID theory is a harmless hobby of some nerds and meaningless, why are posters, who seem to be agents, working so hard to disrespect the theory.
My impression of Heather Mills is that she got herself involved in a situation that was not what she was led to believe initially and was in over her head. They, whomever "they" are, used very heavy power and leverage to try to control her but she got wise and wouldn't play along. They spit her out of the inner circle with all kinds of character assassination. When all that was going on, I too bought into "hey, what a greedy wench she is, what a golddigger!"... which is precisely what "they" wanted you to think. Now, however, I have a totally revisionist view of Heather Mills. I think she was sucked into the deal and got wise to it and then was persecuted.
I'm now a supporter of Heather Mills.
Originally posted by seaofgreen
you're trying to convince people that there were 2 people going under the name PM
Originally posted by switching yard
Sounds crazy, but I tend to think the ritual sacrifice scenario makes the most sense...
I think this would have blown the minds of the inner circle because they all would have been doubting themselves. Like they would have thought to themselves "this can't be him, but it must be" and it was like the ultimate mind bender.
I believe Kubrick was murdered because he revealed too much.
Originally posted by switching yard
But ridicule is precisely the tactic that disinfo agents and the controlled mass media use to try to control the masses.
My impression of Heather Mills is that she got herself involved in a situation that was not what she was led to believe initially and was in over her head... They spit her out of the inner circle with all kinds of character assassination...
Originally posted by Uncle Benny
...you will also find the same debunkers on many different forums trying to brew up a storm. Thankfully the moderators are top notch on this site and don`t let anything go.
If the veil was lifted on McCartney (and the masses became aware of the doppelganger) then one would have to ask how many more people in high positions have been replaced with doubles - This is an extremely sensitive area for many.
... “Rumors of a dummy Kim began circulating after the summit. Some of us said we should have Kim’s voice prints analyzed. But if we did that and proved the prime minister had been conferring with a double, it could have destroyed the Koizumi administration. So we didn’t proceed.” ...
Korea's Kim died in 2003; replaced by lookalike, says Waseda professor
www.japantoday.com...
Originally posted by faulconandsnowjob
What we cannot provide is Paul's dead body or a confession from Faul.
Originally posted by seaofgreen
I'd have thought a confession should be an aim -- if the evidence grows to a high enough level, he'd have no choice.
Margaret Augusta Eliot ... was a professor of oboe at the Guildhall School of Music and Drama; her best known student was George Martin. She is a great granddaughter of Edward Granville Eliot, 3rd Earl of St Germans (1798-1877).
Margaret Eliot was born to Edward Granville Eliot, a younger brother of the 7th and 8th Earls of St Germans... On 27 July, 1943,[2] she was married to Dr Richard Asher (1912-1969); the couple had three children: Peter Asher (b. 1944), who was one half of the pop duo Peter & Gordon; Jane Asher (b. 1946), the film and TV actress, novelist and Clare Asher (b. 1948), the radio actress.
en.wikipedia.org...
...Paul McCartney moved into the spare bedroom in the attic of the Asher household at 57 Wimpole Street, London, in November 1963 and stayed until early 1966...
www.imdb.com...
On 25 December 1967[11] McCartney and Asher announced their engagement, and she accompanied McCartney to India in February and March 1968. Asher broke off the engagement in early 1968, after coming back from Bristol to find Paul in bed with another woman, Francie Schwartz.[2][12] ... Asher has consistently refused to publicly discuss McCartney or her time with him,[13] and has maintained her position on the matter to this day.[14]...
en.wikipedia.org...
... Marianne Faithfull remembered McCartney and Asher "never getting on very well"...
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by switching yard
Here's another juicy quote from The Walrus Was Paul by R. Gary Patterson, page 34 of the paperback edition... "According to Michael McCartney (Paul's brother), Paul had a crash on a motorbike that caused (quoting Mike McCartney now) 'severe facial injuries to one half of his baby face'" and the source for that according to Gary Patterson is page 158, Beatlesongs by William Dowlding, Simon & Schuster 1983.
Originally posted by switching yard
... Perhaps there was no crash at all, but insiders were told there was...
Anyway, the Hospital Switch idea is just one way I've imagined they could have put it over Paul's family and Brian Epstein in a slick way...
He was also gay and subject to blackmail