Paul McCartney died in 1966 - replaced by Billy Shepherd

There are some very disturbing things lurking below the surface of PID that some people just don't want to see. I get it, but I've just never been one of those people to stick my head in the sand. I'd rather know than not know, even if it's upsetting.

Originally posted by pmexplorer

Photos from one end of the sixties to the other of varying sizes and quality where you seemingly fail to account
for a boy turning into a man, natural ageing, weight gain, hair growth,
constant change in fashion and personal grooming styles, edited photographs etc etc etc.
Sorry but you're not fooling anyone mate.

But his nose!
Surely you SEE that his nose shape changed...by hook or by crook!

I could call you an idiot too, but I'll leave that for you to do to yourself as you seem to like calling everyone who disagrees with you an idiot.

Good game, now I know the rules....

..but no, I won't be an idiot and sink to your level.

The nose, lad, look at the nose.

[edit on 7-7-2009 by aorAki]

Your nose continues ot grow your entire life (as I have said before multiple times). Some peoples change more than others, depending on lifestyle, genetics and god alone knows what else.


Wayne...

reply to post by the secret web


Yes, I've seen your posts, but it doesn't answer it for me.


My nose has stayed consistent in architecture over my life, my mother has a hooky beak and it is unchanged over sixty years, so no, I don't buy your idea

He had a nose that was slightly upturned and then it changed into a hook...dramatically, over a few months...explain that please...



[edit on 7-7-2009 by aorAki]

Originally posted by the secret web
Your nose continues ot grow your entire life (as I have said before multiple times). Some peoples change more than others, depending on lifestyle, genetics and god alone knows what else.

In 4 months?

[edit on 7-7-2009 by SednaSon]

So, we're supposed to believe that Paul went thru some bizarre metamorphosis between Aug & Dec 1966 that changed his eye color, eyebrows, eyelashes, length & shape of his nose, his ears, his hair part, his forehead, & he grew a couple of inches. Ok... lol.

The more logical explanation is that it's a different guy. That would explain the different facial features & the variance in height. The only obstacle to seeing it is that people so desperately don't want it to be true. Actually, another obstacle may be that people have been trained to see Faul as Paul.



[edit on 7-7-2009 by faulconandsnowjob]

No .. the surgeon could of done a better job..

Fact is, If your standing there scoureing for simularities. That is the problem ...

[edit on 7-7-2009 by Bldrvgr]

^ Great comp. The eyes, eyebrow, & neck are completely different.



Sometimes the individual features look quite similar, but the overall look is definitely not the same.

Don't be hood-winked.

[edit on 7-7-2009 by faulconandsnowjob]

reply to post by faulconandsnowjob


Whats the time frame between the 2 pictures you showed there? ^^^^

[edit on 7-7-2009 by Strictsum]

Whats the time frame between the 2 pictures you showed there?

"Help!" was 1965 & "Hey Jude" was 1968.

Here are the videos the pics are from:







[edit on 7-7-2009 by faulconandsnowjob]

It is certainly hard to deny the fact that it looks like 2 different people. I have been looking at a few sites about this and I saw a picture where he's sitting at a table with a red jacket and black gloves on. The table has 3 candles on it. You probably know what I'm talking about. That picture doesn't even resemble Paul McCartney, lol.


I can't figure out how to put it on here. haha
[edit on 7-7-2009 by Strictsum]

[edit on 7-7-2009 by Strictsum]

[edit on 7-7-2009 by Strictsum]

[edit on 7-7-2009 by Strictsum]

Originally posted by faulconandsnowjob

I think it has to be the same person just because of the hands.

Really? Even though so many other things are different, like the faces & the height? Ok... lol. But, the hands were different. Faul's palm was longer w/ shorter fingers compared to Paul's.

And even if the hands do look similar, I'm not buying it. Not unless it's the same fingerprint. But what are the chances of that.
[edit on 6-7-2009 by faulconandsnowjob]

Dam this was right under my nose... Forget about the purportion of the hands and focus on palm reading. You cannot fake that. The problem is, Getting Pauls palm shot. and this is the first i've found.

Fauls is everywhere. He likes holding his hands out. Just wish this was a bit clearer...

[edit on 7-7-2009 by Bldrvgr]

I saw a picture where he's sitting at a table with a red jacket and black gloves on. The table has 3 candles on it. You probably know what I'm talking about. That picture doesn't even resemble Paul McCartney

Not only does it not look like Paul, it shows his right-handed tendencies. lol

reply to post by Bldrvgr


The palm lines are very very similar. I won't say identical but very very similar. Somewhere on this thread there's a link to David Ickes site. That link takes you to a thread discussing this. There's a couple good pictures on there of his palm.

reply to post by faulconandsnowjob


lol, yeah, the more I look into this the more I'm starting to lean your way but I'm still not sure. There's just so much weird stuff going on here.

Originally posted by Strictsum
reply to post by faulconandsnowjob

 

lol, yeah, the more I look into this the more I'm starting to lean your way but I'm still not sure. There's just so much weird stuff going on here.

That could well have been written by me. Are you sure you're not FaorAki?

../.but seriously, whether or not you believe he was replaced, something is up, something doesn't fit quite right and most of all, this is damned interesting at the least!

It's Faul in "Penny Lane" w/ the red jacket.






[edit on 7-7-2009 by faulconandsnowjob]

reply to post by aorAki


Let me check,nope, still me. Yep this is interesting stuff.

Heres the picture I was talking about


digilander.libero.it...

[edit on 7-7-2009 by Strictsum]

No, it really doesn't look like Paul, does it?

Originally posted by Strictsum
reply to post by Bldrvgr

 

The palm lines are very very similar. I won't say identical but very very similar. Somewhere on this thread there's a link to David Ickes site. That link takes you to a thread discussing this. There's a couple good pictures on there of his palm.

Finally found page 138.. The plams are confusing me even more. They are not the same Though im looking at more then those pictures that i have scoured over the net. The hand with the bar on it though, I cannot seem to find the full picture on.

In anycase the plaque is interesting .. and its interesting that fauls Right hand contradicts it. Left hand: ppl are mistakeing the lack of detail to be determining they are the same.. Its true there is no real clear pic on any of them. But the lines on paul is shorter then faul.