It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
JERUSALEM, Feb. 14 — The United States and Israel are discussing ways to destabilize the Palestinian government so that newly elected Hamas officials will fail and elections will be called again, according to Israeli officials and Western diplomats.
The intention is to starve the Palestinian Authority of money and international connections to the point where, some months from now, its president, Mahmoud Abbas, is compelled to call a new election. The hope is that Palestinians will be so unhappy with life under Hamas that they will return to office a reformed and chastened Fatah movement.
The officials also argue that a close look at the election results shows that Hamas won a smaller mandate than previously understood.
The officials and diplomats, who said this approach was being discussed at the highest levels of the State Department and the Israeli government, spoke on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to speak publicly on the issue.
Originally posted by ArchAngel
I believe the Saudis have said they will cover any shortfall.
The article is all unsupported supposition, and outright offensive.
America and Israel should accept Hamas's truece offer, but thats not what Israel wants.
Without a partner for peace why should Hamas listen to America, or Israel?
What more can they do to achieve peace?
Everything Israel claims to want short or recognition is in an open offer on the Table.
But of course, as most everyone knows, Israel wants far more than they openly claim.
All of the land with all non-Jews kicked out is what they want.
Originally posted by Strangerous
Hmm those pesky 'Western Diplomats' again.
If Hamas are willing to tone it down don't see what justification there could be for ignoring the democratic will of the people.
Or is democracy only OK if it returns the result you wanted in the first place?
Originally posted by deltaboy
The intention is to starve the Palestinian Authority of money
Associated Press: A-Zahar rejects 'satanic' US aid
Hamas leader Mahmoud A-Zahar vowed Monday not to bow to American threats to cut aid.
"I wish America would cut off its aid. We do not need this satanic money," Zahar said in Cairo.
"Recognizing the state of the Israeli enemy is not on the table," he said.
"Our program is to liberate Palestine, all of Palestine....The Qassam Brigades will continue to increase in numbers, supplies, and weapons...until the liberation is completed."
"Anyone who thinks the calm means giving in is mistaken. The calm is in preparation for a new round of resistance and victory."
Originally posted by deltaboy
The officials also argue that a close look at the election results shows that Hamas won a smaller mandate than previously understood.
60% of Palestinians Voted Against Hamas
The results of the Palestinian election should be seen as a freak produced by a combination of peculiar electoral rules and political uncertainties.
Hamas ended up with 74 out of 132 seats in the Palestinian National Assembly but won only 40% of the popular vote -
which means that 60% voted against it.
Thus, Hamas does not represent the majority on the ground.
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
The Islamic Resistance Movement refuses to acknowledge Israel's right to exist, agrees to abide by earlier agreements only if they like the agreements and refuse to enter into a peace discussion with Israel. I really don't see how they have bent over backwards to do a thing except insure there is a continuing rift between the two sides.
[edit on 14-2-2006 by Thomas Crowne]
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
No matter what cute little Marine crap you can come up with, Hamas is as it is, and there is no logical reason to embrace them, unless you embrace their charter and their bombers. They have not changed their position. To treat them as they have would be insane. Really, it would be insane.
Or is it that some agree with the Hamas charter? I don't know.
Originally posted by Strangerous
I'd agree if you (and us) didn't invade countries on the justification of 'establishing democracy'
If Hamas agree to non-violent means but remain ideologically opposed to Israel then no issue - same, same with Sinn Fein/PIRA
Originally posted by Strangerous
Hmm those pesky 'Western Diplomats' again.
If Hamas are willing to tone it down don't see what justification there could be for ignoring the democratic will of the people.
Or is democracy only OK if it returns the result you wanted in the first place?
Originally posted by PsychoSteve85
I agree if its democracy its democracy why do we have to undermine other nations. I thought we were suppose to perserve democracy not destroy it.