It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by IComeWithASword
If no one else has any objection to living in MY WORLD, be so kind as to remove your collection of AS's from my presence.
There is a limit to my patience.
Originally posted by zer69
What kind of evidence will be good enough for you to believe officials?
Originally posted by zer69
Hey,
OK so we're eventually going to see the "new" video from pentagon (besides the 5FPS crap) as mentioned in this AgentSmith's thread
I am assuming that we will clearly see an airliner hitting the pentagon on this video so few questions come to my mind they're mainly for "inside job" believers, but I would love to read from others too:
- Will this be enough for you to believe that the 14-20 cave-dwellers did the job? If no, what actual evidence will be enough for ya? Like on-board video from one of the flight where you can see the Arab terrorists?
- Do you think that with current Audio-Video (AV) technology they're able to fake it so the AV pros aren't going to realize that it's faked? Hope that we have some AV insiders here.
- What other evidence will be a proof for you that there is no 9/11 conspiracy, so you can move on?
My opinion is that when I would see a clear video, which properly shows an airliner hitting the pentagon, it'll fairly move my mind in favor to 9/11 no conspiracy side. Also as far as I know they're not able to fake the video properly with current technology.
I believe that there is a lot of people who just blindly believe that the 9/11 was a conspiracy because it must've been. I see the same behaving from 9/11 conformists too, I understand it's more comfortable and simpler to think that the Arab terrorists did it and also "paid" for it (this is important) and we're kickin' their butts in Afghanistan and Iraq so the world will be a better place and US Gov is telling us the truth.
Thanks.
[edit on 2006-2-2 by zer69]