posted on Nov, 19 2013 @ 03:56 PM
syrinx high priest
no matter the theory, you have to account for the breeding population factor. the smallest group I know of is about 35 mountain goat type animals in
the western US, they are independent, and still surviving.
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, and say there are 30 bigfeet out there.
Yeah, the problem I have the hardest time getting around is the breeding population requirement, coupled with the sheer reported
size of the
things. And of course, poop.
Every once in a while a new forest mammal species will be discovered, but it's usually some tiny little deer or something. They wander around eat
some of the underbrush, and you wouldn't be able to spot their poop from some other similar little deer species.
But Bigfoots are BIG. They take up a lot of space, and if you have enough of them clustered together to create a community or breeding population,
they're going to have an obvious impact on the environment.
It would be nice if somebody could find one or more tucked away in the woods, but I don't see that happening anytime soon. I'm a Bigfoot fan, but
it's hard for me to get past the practical problems.